| Literature DB >> 23365585 |
Masayuki Komatsu1, Madhu Biyani, Sunita Ghimire Gautam, Koichi Nishigaki.
Abstract
Enzymes are regulated by their activation and inhibition. Enzyme activators can often be effective tools for scientific and medical purposes, although they are more difficult to obtain than inhibitors. Here, using the paired peptide method, we report on protease-cathepsin-E-activating peptides that are obtained at neutral pH. These selected peptides also underwent molecular evolution, after which their cathepsin E activation capability improved. Thus, the activators we obtained could enhance cathepsin-E-induced cancer cell apoptosis, which indicated their potential as cancer drug precursors.Entities:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23365585 PMCID: PMC3534310 DOI: 10.1155/2012/316432
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Pept ISSN: 1687-9767
Figure 1Systematic of the in vitro evolution strategy for obtaining enzyme activators. (a) Progressive library. Functional peptides were identified from the first random peptide library. The second library was generated by combining peptide blocks selected from the primary library and subjecting them to the next round of selection. The third library was constructed by pairing two peptides selected from the second library. (b) Schematic representation of cDNA display-based selection-by-function. SbF-worked r/d-IVV was an RNA/DNA-type in vitro virus construct augmented with the selection-by-function construct. SbF-worked dIVV could be cleaved by cathepsin E if its binding activated cathepsin E, as shown in the box.
Cathepsin-E-activating peptides and spacer peptides used for paired peptide library construction.
| Name1 | Size (a.a.) | Amino acid sequence (N→C) | Activity (%)2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | 13 | IEGRVGCDFMYVG |
|
| S2 | 8 | GSPCIGII |
|
| S3 | 8 | IVIHQQLL | — |
| S4 | 8 | PGIKIIIIG |
|
| S5 | 9 | IGPQFGMCG | — |
| S6 | 10 | PGFEERSSEG | — |
| S7 | 16 | SPIISHIVGCDPPSCG |
|
| S8 | 16 | IGCEERSFPNIIIIIG |
|
| S9 | 13 | SGIKVGCDPPSCG |
|
| S10 | 13 | PGIKPPPCIIIIG |
|
| s1 | 10 | GGGSGGGSGG | — |
| s2 | 10 | GGGPGGGPGG | — |
| s3 | 15 | GGGSGGGSGGGSGGG | — |
| s4 | 15 | GGGPGGGPGGGPGGG | — |
1Cathepsin E-activating peptides (S1–S10) obtained from primary library selection [9] and spacer peptides (s1–s4) are shown.
2Activities were determined using peptides produced by the in vitro translation system (in italics) or chemical synthesis (in bold). Note that the former is less reliable than the latter and sometimes exhibits a higher activity than the latter and sometimes adversely systematically [19]. Cathepsin E activity alone was considered as to be 100%.
Amino acid sequences of selected peptides.
| Name | Paired blocks1 | Amino acid sequence (N→C)2 | Size (a.a.) | Activity (%)3 | Frequency4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1 | S2-(s1)- |
| 45 | — | 6 |
| T2 | S2-(s1)- |
| 45 | — | 1 |
| T3 | S2-(s1)- |
| 34 | — | 6 |
| T4 | S2-(s1)- |
| 33 |
| 1 |
| T5 | S2-(s1)- |
| 32 | — | 1 |
| T6 | S10-(s1)- |
| 29 |
| 2 |
| T7 |
|
| 25 |
| 1 |
| T8 |
|
| 25 | — | 1 |
| T9 |
|
| 21 | — | 1 |
| T10 |
|
| 21 | — | 1 |
| T11 |
|
| 26 |
| 1 |
1See Table 1 for block names detail. Novel blocks were temporarily labeled as α, β, γ, δ, ε, and ζ.
2Bold regions were contained in the original blocks.
3Peptides for activity assay were obtained by in vitro translation (in italic) or chemical synthesis (in bold). In this study, the discrepancy is unexpectedly large and adverse to our previous experiences due to unknown reason [19].
4Copy numbers found in sequenced clones.
Figure 2Activities and affinities of selected peptides for cathepsin E activation. (a) Cathepsin E activity enhancement by chemically synthesized peptides selected from the secondary ASAC library (S1 and S2) and the third paired peptide library (T4 and T11). Cathepsin E and peptide concentrations were 20 nM. Error bars indicate the standard deviations of triplicate experiments. (b) Typical SPR sensorgram obtained from the interaction between paired peptide T4 and cathepsin E. To determine the dissociation constant (K ), four different peptide concentrations were injected. The range from 40 s to 150 s corresponded to association, while that from 150 s to 250 s corresponded to dissociation.
Figure 3Biological effects of a paired peptide on HeLa cells. (a) Induction of cancer cell death by cathepsin E and its enhancement by a peptide. Cell viability was determined using a cell counting kit after treating HeLa cells for 20 h with cathepsin E and peptide T11 at different molar ratios (cathepsin E: peptide = 1 : 0, 1 : 10, 1 : 100). (b) Effect of a cathepsin E-activating peptide on cancer cell apoptosis. Apoptotic cells were stained with Annexin V-Cy3 for 24 h after incubating HeLa cells in the presence of 77 nM cathepsin E and 7.7 μM peptide T11. (c) Assessment of caspase activity induced by cathepsin E-activating peptide. Caspase-3 and/or -7 was measured at 24 h after incubating HeLa cells in the presence of 77 nM cathepsin E and 7.7 μM peptide T11. Error bars indicate the standard deviations of three independent experiments. Statistical significance is denoted by the symbols (* < 0.05, **< 0.01) and was based on comparison by Student's t-test.