Literature DB >> 27477630

Willing to wait: Elevated reward-processing EEG activity associated with a greater preference for larger-but-delayed rewards.

Narun Pornpattananangkul1, Robin Nusslock2.   

Abstract

While almost everyone discounts the value of future rewards over immediate rewards, people differ in their so-called delay-discounting. One of the several factors that may explain individual differences in delay-discounting is reward-processing. To study individual-differences in reward-processing, however, one needs to consider the heterogeneity of neural-activity at each reward-processing stage. Here using EEG, we separated reward-related neural activity into distinct reward-anticipation and reward-outcome stages using time-frequency characteristics. Thirty-seven individuals first completed a behavioral delay-discounting task. Then reward-processing EEG activity was assessed using a separate reward-learning task, called a reward time-estimation task. During this EEG task, participants were instructed to estimate time duration and were provided performance feedback on a trial-by-trial basis. Participants received monetary-reward for accurate-performance on Reward trials, but not on No-Reward trials. Reward trials, relative to No-Reward trials, enhanced EEG activity during both reward-anticipation (including, cued-locked delta power during cue-evaluation and pre-feedback alpha suppression during feedback-anticipation) and reward-outcome (including, feedback-locked delta, theta and beta power) stages. Moreover, all of these EEG indices correlated with behavioral performance in the time-estimation task, suggesting their essential roles in learning and adjusting performance to maximize winnings in a reward-learning situation. Importantly, enhanced EEG power during Reward trials, as reflected by stronger 1) pre-feedback alpha suppression, 2) feedback-locked theta and 3) feedback-locked beta, was associated with a greater preference for larger-but-delayed rewards in a separate, behavioral delay-discounting task. Results highlight the association between a stronger preference toward larger-but-delayed rewards and enhanced reward-processing. Moreover, our reward-processing EEG indices detail the specific stages of reward-processing where these associations occur.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Delay discounting; Feedback-locked beta; Frontal midline theta; Pre-stimulus alpha suppression; Reward-processing

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27477630      PMCID: PMC5110616          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.07.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  86 in total

1.  Effects of information and reward on stimulus-preceding negativity prior to feedback stimuli.

Authors:  Yasunori Kotani; Sachiko Kishida; Shiho Hiraku; Kazuhiro Suda; Motonobu Ishii; Yasutsugu Aihara
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.016

Review 2.  Delay of gratification in children.

Authors:  W Mischel; Y Shoda; M I Rodriguez
Journal:  Science       Date:  1989-05-26       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Learning-induced modulations of the stimulus-preceding negativity.

Authors:  Joaquín Morís; David Luque; Antoni Rodríguez-Fornells
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2013-06-30       Impact factor: 4.016

Review 4.  A framework for studying the neurobiology of value-based decision making.

Authors:  Antonio Rangel; Colin Camerer; P Read Montague
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2008-06-11       Impact factor: 34.870

5.  P300 from men with a family history of alcoholism under different incentive conditions.

Authors:  S E Ramsey; P R Finn
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol       Date:  1997-11

6.  Shaping functional architecture by oscillatory alpha activity: gating by inhibition.

Authors:  Ole Jensen; Ali Mazaheri
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Gene-gene interaction associated with neural reward sensitivity.

Authors:  Juliana Yacubian; Tobias Sommer; Katrin Schroeder; Jan Gläscher; Raffael Kalisch; Boris Leuenberger; Dieter F Braus; Christian Büchel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-05-02       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Fast oscillations in cortical-striatal networks switch frequency following rewarding events and stimulant drugs.

Authors:  J D Berke
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2009-07-31       Impact factor: 3.386

9.  High-learners present larger mid-frontal theta power and connectivity in response to incorrect performance feedback.

Authors:  Caroline Di Bernardi Luft; Guido Nolte; Joydeep Bhattacharya
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Age modulates the effect of COMT genotype on delay discounting behavior.

Authors:  Christopher T Smith; Charlotte A Boettiger
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2012-02-18       Impact factor: 4.530

View more
  11 in total

1.  Emotional content impacts how executive function ability relates to willingness to wait and to work for reward.

Authors:  Katherine S F Damme; Nicholas J Kelley; Meghan E Quinn; James E Glazer; Iris Ka-Yi Chat; Katherine S Young; Robin Nusslock; Richard Zinbarg; Susan Bookheimer; Michelle G Craske
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Reappraisal and suppression emotion-regulation tendencies differentially predict reward-responsivity and psychological well-being.

Authors:  Nicholas J Kelley; James E Glazer; Narun Pornpattananangkul; Robin Nusslock
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 3.251

3.  Laboratory-induced learned helplessness attenuates approach motivation as indexed by posterior versus frontal theta activity.

Authors:  Samantha J Reznik; Robin Nusslock; Narun Pornpattananangkul; Lyn Y Abramson; James A Coan; Eddie Harmon-Jones
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  Elevated outcome-anticipation and outcome-evaluation ERPs associated with a greater preference for larger-but-delayed rewards.

Authors:  Narun Pornpattananangkul; Ajay Nadig; Storm Heidinger; Keegan Walden; Robin Nusslock
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.282

5.  Measuring facets of reward sensitivity, inhibition, and impulse control in individuals with problematic Internet use.

Authors:  Teresa Vargas; Jacqueline Maloney; Tina Gupta; Katherine S F Damme; Nicholas J Kelley; Vijay A Mittal
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2019-03-19       Impact factor: 3.222

6.  To Know or Not to Know? Theta and Delta Reflect Complementary Information about an Advanced Cue before Feedback in Decision-Making.

Authors:  Jing Wang; Zhaofeng Chen; Xiaozhe Peng; Tiantian Yang; Peng Li; Fengyu Cong; Hong Li
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-10-06

7.  Oscillatory rhythm of reward: anticipation and processing of rewards in children with and without autism.

Authors:  Katherine Kuhl-Meltzoff Stavropoulos; Leslie J Carver
Journal:  Mol Autism       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 7.509

8.  Slow and Fast Responses: Two Mechanisms of Trial Outcome Processing Revealed by EEG Oscillations.

Authors:  Nikita A Novikov; Yulia M Nurislamova; Natalia A Zhozhikashvili; Evgenii E Kalenkovich; Anna A Lapina; Boris V Chernyshev
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-05-05       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Power of Feedback-Induced Beta Oscillations Reflect Omission of Rewards: Evidence From an EEG Gambling Study.

Authors:  Zachary Yaple; Mario Martinez-Saito; Nikita Novikov; Dmitrii Altukhov; Anna Shestakova; Vasily Klucharev
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  Monetary Incentives Modulate Feedback-related Brain Activity.

Authors:  Shuting Mei; Qi Li; Xun Liu; Ya Zheng
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.