Literature DB >> 23365026

Cementless fixation in Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement: a multicentre study of 1000 knees.

A D Liddle1, H Pandit, S O'Brien, E Doran, I D Penny, G J Hooper, P J Burn, C A F Dodd, D E Beverland, A R Maxwell, D W Murray.   

Abstract

The Cementless Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Replacement (OUKR) was developed to address problems related to cementation, and has been demonstrated in a randomised study to have similar clinical outcomes with fewer radiolucencies than observed with the cemented device. However, before its widespread use it is necessary to clarify contraindications and assess the complications. This requires a larger study than any previously published. We present a prospective multicentre series of 1000 cementless OUKRs in 881 patients at a minimum follow-up of one year. All patients had radiological assessment aligned to the bone-implant interfaces and clinical scores. Analysis was performed at a mean of 38.2 months (19 to 88) following surgery. A total of 17 patients died (comprising 19 knees (1.9%)), none as a result of surgery; there were no tibial or femoral loosenings. A total of 19 knees (1.9%) had significant implant-related complications or required revision. Implant survival at six years was 97.2%, and there was a partial radiolucency at the bone-implant interface in 72 knees (8.9%), with no complete radiolucencies. There was no significant increase in complication rate compared with cemented fixation (p = 0.87), and no specific contraindications to cementless fixation were identified. Cementless OUKR appears to be safe and reproducible in patients with end-stage anteromedial osteoarthritis of the knee, with radiological evidence of improved fixation compared with previous reports using cemented fixation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23365026     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.95B2.30411

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Joint J        ISSN: 2049-4394            Impact factor:   5.082


  27 in total

Review 1.  Larger range of motion and increased return to activity, but higher revision rates following unicompartmental versus total knee arthroplasty in patients under 65: a systematic review.

Authors:  Laura J Kleeblad; Jelle P van der List; Hendrik A Zuiderbaan; Andrew D Pearle
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  Outcomes of cementless fixation in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: review of recent literature.

Authors:  M Basso; E Arnaldi; A A M Bruno; M Formica
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2020-06-26

3.  A semi-automated measurement technique for the assessment of radiolucency.

Authors:  E C Pegg; B J L Kendrick; H G Pandit; H S Gill; D W Murray
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 4.  Cementless fixation in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Authors:  S Campi; H G Pandit; C A F Dodd; D W Murray
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Cementless versus cemented Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: early results of a non-designer user group.

Authors:  B Kerens; M G M Schotanus; B Boonen; P Boog; P J Emans; H Lacroix; N P Kort
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Five-year experience of cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement.

Authors:  H G Pandit; S Campi; T W Hamilton; O D Dada; S Pollalis; C Jenkins; C A F Dodd; D W Murray
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Meniscal allograft with or without osteotomy: a 15-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Hussain A Kazi; Wael Abdel-Rahman; Philip A Brady; John C Cameron
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-09-14       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Promising short-term clinical results of the cementless Oxford phase III medial unicondylar knee prosthesis.

Authors:  Karin B van Dorp; Stefan Jm Breugem; Daniël J Bruijn; Marcel Jm Driessen
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2016-04-18

9.  A high rate of tibial plateau fractures after early experience with patient-specific instrumentation for unicompartmental knee arthroplasties.

Authors:  A M Leenders; M G M Schotanus; R J P Wind; R A P Borghans; N P Kort
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Medium-term outcome of cementless, mobile-bearing, unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Radosław Stempin; Kacper Stempin; Wiesław Kaczmarek
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.