Literature DB >> 23364015

Does diet-beverage intake affect dietary consumption patterns? Results from the Choose Healthy Options Consciously Everyday (CHOICE) randomized clinical trial.

Carmen Piernas1, Deborah F Tate, Xiaoshan Wang, Barry M Popkin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Little is understood about the effect of increased consumption of low-calorie sweeteners in diet beverages on dietary patterns and energy intake.
OBJECTIVE: We investigated whether energy intakes and dietary patterns were different in subjects who were randomly assigned to substitute caloric beverages with either water or diet beverages (DBs).
DESIGN: Participants from the Choose Healthy Options Consciously Everyday randomized clinical trial (a 6-mo, 3-arm study) were included in the analysis [water groups: n = 106 (94% women); DB group: n = 104 (82% women)]. For energy, macronutrient, and food and beverage intakes, we investigated the main effects of time, treatment, and the treatment-by-time interaction by using mixed models.
RESULTS: Overall, the macronutrient composition changed in both groups without significant differences between groups over time. Both groups reduced absolute intakes of total daily energy, carbohydrates, fat, protein, saturated fat, total sugar, added sugar, and other carbohydrates. The DB group decreased energy from all beverages more than the water group did only at month 3 (P-group-by-time < 0.05). Although the water group had a greater reduction in grain intake at month 3 and a greater increase in fruit and vegetable intake at month 6 (P-group-by-time < 0.05), the DB group had a greater reduction in dessert intake than the water group did at month 6 (P-group-by-time < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Participants in both intervention groups showed positive changes in energy intakes and dietary patterns. The DB group showed decreases in most caloric beverages and specifically reduced more desserts than the water group did. Our study does not provide evidence to suggest that a short-term consumption of DBs, compared with water, increases preferences for sweet foods and beverages. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01017783.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23364015      PMCID: PMC3578403          DOI: 10.3945/ajcn.112.048405

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr        ISSN: 0002-9165            Impact factor:   7.045


  39 in total

Review 1.  Analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Peter Peduzzi; William Henderson; Pamela Hartigan; Philip Lavori
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 6.222

2.  Dietary patterns matter: diet beverages and cardiometabolic risks in the longitudinal Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) Study.

Authors:  Kiyah J Duffey; Lyn M Steffen; Linda Van Horn; David R Jacobs; Barry M Popkin
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 7.045

3.  Do we eat less fat, or just report so?

Authors:  B L Heitmann; L Lissner; M Osler
Journal:  Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord       Date:  2000-04

4.  Caloric regulation in normal-weight men maintained on a palatable diet of conventional foods.

Authors:  K P Porikos; M F Hesser; T B van Itallie
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1982-08

5.  Screening for alcohol problems in the U.S. general population: comparison of the CAGE, RAPS4, and RAPS4-QF by gender, ethnicity, and service utilization. Rapid Alcohol Problems Screen.

Authors:  Cheryl J Cherpitel
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.455

Review 6.  Effect of sensory perception of foods on appetite and food intake: a review of studies on humans.

Authors:  L B Sørensen; P Møller; A Flint; M Martens; A Raben
Journal:  Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord       Date:  2003-10

7.  Dietary experience and sweet taste preference in human infants.

Authors:  G K Beauchamp; M Moran
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 3.868

8.  Psychosocial predictors of energy underreporting in a large doubly labeled water study.

Authors:  Janet A Tooze; Amy F Subar; Frances E Thompson; Richard Troiano; Arthur Schatzkin; Victor Kipnis
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 7.045

9.  A Pavlovian approach to the problem of obesity.

Authors:  T L Davidson; S E Swithers
Journal:  Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord       Date:  2004-07

10.  Sucrose compared with artificial sweeteners: different effects on ad libitum food intake and body weight after 10 wk of supplementation in overweight subjects.

Authors:  Anne Raben; Tatjana H Vasilaras; A Christina Møller; Arne Astrup
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 7.045

View more
  33 in total

1.  Not so Sweet Revenge: Unanticipated Consequences of High-Intensity Sweeteners.

Authors:  Susan E Swithers
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  2015-03-12

2.  Low/no calorie sweetened beverage consumption in the National Weight Control Registry.

Authors:  Victoria A Catenacci; Zhaoxing Pan; J Graham Thomas; Lorraine G Ogden; Susan A Roberts; Holly R Wyatt; Rena R Wing; James O Hill
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2014-07-10       Impact factor: 5.002

3.  Estimated Substitution of Tea or Coffee for Sugar-Sweetened Beverages Was Associated with Lower Type 2 Diabetes Incidence in Case-Cohort Analysis across 8 European Countries in the EPIC-InterAct Study.

Authors:  Fumiaki Imamura; Matthias B Schulze; Stephen J Sharp; Marcela Guevara; Dora Romaguera; Benedetta Bendinelli; Elena Salamanca-Fernández; Eva Ardanaz; Larraitz Arriola; Dagfinn Aune; Heiner Boeing; Courtney Dow; Guy Fagherazzi; Paul W Franks; Heinz Freisling; Paula Jakszyn; Rudolf Kaaks; Kay-Tee Khaw; Tilman Kühn; Francesca R Mancini; Giovanna Masala; Maria-Dolores Chirlaque; Peter M Nilsson; Kim Overvad; Valeria M Pala; Salvatore Panico; Aurora Perez-Cornago; Jose R Quirós; Fulvio Ricceri; Miguel Rodríguez-Barranco; Olov Rolandsson; Ivonne Sluijs; Magdalena Stepien; Annemieke M W Spijkerman; Anne Tjønneland; Tammy Y N Tong; Rosario Tumino; Linda E T Vissers; Heather A Ward; Claudia Langenberg; Elio Riboli; Nita G Forouhi; Nick J Wareham
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 4.798

4.  Dietary quality changes in response to a sugar-sweetened beverage-reduction intervention: results from the Talking Health randomized controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Valisa E Hedrick; Brenda M Davy; Wen You; Kathleen J Porter; Paul A Estabrooks; Jamie M Zoellner
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 7.045

Review 5.  Sweetening of the global diet, particularly beverages: patterns, trends, and policy responses.

Authors:  Barry M Popkin; Corinna Hawkes
Journal:  Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 32.069

6.  Trends in purchases and intake of foods and beverages containing caloric and low-calorie sweeteners over the last decade in the United States.

Authors:  C Piernas; S W Ng; B Popkin
Journal:  Pediatr Obes       Date:  2013-03-25       Impact factor: 4.000

7.  Not-so-healthy sugar substitutes?

Authors:  Susan E Swithers
Journal:  Curr Opin Behav Sci       Date:  2016-06

Review 8.  Low Calorie Sweetener (LCS) use and energy balance.

Authors:  John C Peters; Jimikaye Beck
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2016-04-07

Review 9.  Understanding the metabolic and health effects of low-calorie sweeteners: methodological considerations and implications for future research.

Authors:  Allison C Sylvetsky; Jenny E Blau; Kristina I Rother
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 6.514

Review 10.  The Association Between Artificial Sweeteners and Obesity.

Authors:  Michelle Pearlman; Jon Obert; Lisa Casey
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2017-11-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.