BACKGROUND: Visceral adipose tissue (VAT) has been identified as a harmful fat depot, and sex and race differences in VAT have been reported in white and African Americans. OBJECTIVES: We determined the clinical utility of VAT in the identification of individuals at elevated cardiometabolic risk in white and African American adults and compared the clinical utility with measures obtained by using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and anthropometric measures. DESIGN: The sample included 429 white women, 311 African American women, 406 white men, and 100 African American men who were 18-74 y of age. VAT was measured by using computed tomography, fat mass (FM) and percentage of body fat were measured by using DXA, and waist circumference (WC) and BMI were assessed. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to compare the utility of measures in the identification of participants in the upper quintile of a continuous score derived from principal components analysis of fasting glucose, HDL cholesterol, triglycerides, and blood pressure. RESULTS: The clinical utility of measures varied across sex-by-race groups. In the overall sample, the areas under the curve were significantly higher for VAT and WC in comparison with the other indicators. Identified VAT thresholds were higher in white men (140 cm(2)) and women (141 cm(2)) than in African American men (82 cm(2)) and women (97 cm(2)). CONCLUSIONS: VAT and WC showed greater clinical utility than did other obesity measures. Because of the complexity of measuring VAT, the use of WC is recommended for the identification of adults with elevated cardiometabolic risk factors. The Pennington Center Longitudinal Study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00959270.
BACKGROUND: Visceral adipose tissue (VAT) has been identified as a harmful fat depot, and sex and race differences in VAT have been reported in white and African Americans. OBJECTIVES: We determined the clinical utility of VAT in the identification of individuals at elevated cardiometabolic risk in white and African American adults and compared the clinical utility with measures obtained by using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and anthropometric measures. DESIGN: The sample included 429 white women, 311 African American women, 406 white men, and 100 African American men who were 18-74 y of age. VAT was measured by using computed tomography, fat mass (FM) and percentage of body fat were measured by using DXA, and waist circumference (WC) and BMI were assessed. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to compare the utility of measures in the identification of participants in the upper quintile of a continuous score derived from principal components analysis of fasting glucose, HDL cholesterol, triglycerides, and blood pressure. RESULTS: The clinical utility of measures varied across sex-by-race groups. In the overall sample, the areas under the curve were significantly higher for VAT and WC in comparison with the other indicators. Identified VAT thresholds were higher in white men (140 cm(2)) and women (141 cm(2)) than in African American men (82 cm(2)) and women (97 cm(2)). CONCLUSIONS: VAT and WC showed greater clinical utility than did other obesity measures. Because of the complexity of measuring VAT, the use of WC is recommended for the identification of adults with elevated cardiometabolic risk factors. The Pennington Center Longitudinal Study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00959270.
Authors: J P Després; C Couillard; J Gagnon; J Bergeron; A S Leon; D C Rao; J S Skinner; J H Wilmore; C Bouchard Journal: Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol Date: 2000-08 Impact factor: 8.311
Authors: Jennifer L Kuk; Peter T Katzmarzyk; Milton Z Nichaman; Timothy S Church; Steven N Blair; Robert Ross Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2006-02 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: May A Beydoun; Marie T Fanelli Kuczmarski; Youfa Wang; Marc A Mason; Michele K Evans; Alan B Zonderman Journal: Public Health Nutr Date: 2010-09-21 Impact factor: 4.022
Authors: Anne E Sumner; Sabyasachi Sen; Madia Ricks; Barbara A Frempong; Nancy G Sebring; Harvey Kushner Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2008-02-21 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Sanjiv Kaul; Megan P Rothney; Dawn M Peters; Wynn K Wacker; Cynthia E Davis; Michael D Shapiro; David L Ergun Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2012-01-26 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Mingxia Yuan; Fang-Chi Hsu; Donald W Bowden; Jianzhao Xu; S Carrie Smith; Lynne E Wagenknecht; Mary E Comeau; Jasmin Divers; Thomas C Register; J Jeffrey Carr; Carl D Langefeld; Barry I Freedman Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2016-06-29 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: L G Machado; D S Domiciano; C P Figueiredo; V F Caparbo; L Takayama; R M Oliveira; J B Lopes; P R Menezes; R M R Pereira Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2016-06-28 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Ruban Dhaliwal; John A Shepherd; Laure El Ghormli; Kenneth C Copeland; Mitchell E Geffner; Janine Higgins; Lynne L Levitsky; Kristen J Nadeau; Ruth S Weinstock; Neil H White Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2019-06-05 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Michelle Y O'Connor; Caroline K Thoreson; Madia Ricks; Amber B Courville; Francine Thomas; Jianhua Yao; Peter T Katzmarzyk; Anne E Sumner Journal: Metab Syndr Relat Disord Date: 2014-05-09 Impact factor: 1.894
Authors: Jacquelyn A Hatch-Stein; Andrea Kelly; Samuel S Gidding; Babette S Zemel; Sheela N Magge Journal: J Clin Lipidol Date: 2016-02-16 Impact factor: 4.766