| Literature DB >> 23363783 |
Anapaula Cb Rizzo1, Tamara Bl Goldberg, Carla C Silva, Cilmery S Kurokawa, Helio Rc Nunes, José E Corrente.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Obesity in infancy and adolescence has acquired epidemic dimensions worldwide and is considered a risk factor for a number of disorders that can manifest at an early age, such as Metabolic Syndrome (MS). In this study, we evaluated overweight, obese, and extremely obese adolescents for the presence of MS, and studied the prevalence of single factors of the syndrome in this population.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23363783 PMCID: PMC3602008 DOI: 10.1186/1475-2891-12-19
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutr J ISSN: 1475-2891 Impact factor: 3.271
Nutritional assessment and laboratory variables for adolescents according to gender
| 13.28 | 2.26 | 12.66 | 2.05 | 12.45 | 1.61 | |
| 25.10 | 2.62 | 27.98 | 3.07 | 33.99 | 5.17 | |
| 82.84 | 8.34 | 87.39 | 8.85 | 95.84 | 10.68 | |
| 49.24 | 9.95 | 42.19 | 8.68 | 40.53 | 13.08 | |
| 92.11a | 35.74 | 107.41 | 68.11 | 121.33 | 46.38 | |
| 110.73 | 8.18 | 116.24 | 14.53 | 127.58 | 18.40 | |
| 68.66 | 6.89 | 71.47 | 12.63 | 81.93 | 12.12 | |
| 82.60a | 8.43 | 83.58a | 15.85 | 82.56a | 7.52 | |
| 13.78 | 4.79 | 17.58 | 10.22 | 20.38 | 9.50 | |
| 2.79 | 0.99 | 3.65 | 2.26 | 4.12 | 1.84 | |
| 0.33 | 0.02 | 0.32 | 0.02 | 0.32 | 0.02 | |
| 7.37 | 7.03 | 5.88 | 2.69 | 5.12 | 3.18 | |
| | ||||||
| 12.62 a | 1.76 | 12.89 | 1.68 | 12.65 a | 2.22 | |
| 24.07 | 2.12 | 27.12 | 2.69 | 32.13 | 4.11 | |
| 81.03 | 7.54 | 86.02 | 10.14 | 95.19 | 11.28 | |
| 43.10 | 8.31 | 44.22 | 11.37 | 44.31 | 8.97 | |
| 103.38 | 76.60 | 95.71 | 58.68 | 117.83 | 55.34 | |
| 111.17 | 15.01 | 115.16 | 14.10 | 125.98 | 13.06 | |
| 69.28 | 10.70 | 74.73 | 10.20 | 76.88 | 12.17 | |
| 83.59a | 7.22 | 83.77a | 7.90 | 86.51a | 5.79 | |
| 13.72 | 9.90 | 14.08 | 7.64 | 16.13a | 8.07 | |
| 2.84 | 2.03 | 2.89 | 1.62 | 3.45 | 1.71 | |
| 0.34a | 0.04 | 0.33 | 0.03 | 0.32 | 0.02 | |
| 10.86 | 10.43 | 7.84 | 5.99 | 6.32 | 2.38 | |
Note: (1) Multiple comparison using PROC GENMOD from SAS program.
(2) Multiple comparisons using ANOVA and Tukey test.
* p < 0.05 **p < 0.01 NS not significant.
The same letters show no statistically significant difference.
Total number of female adolescents = 174.
Total number of male adolescents = 147.
BMI Body Mass Index, AbdC Abdominal circumference, HDLc-HDL cholesterol, TGTriglycerides, SBP Systolic Blood Pressure, DBP Diastolic Blood Pressure, HOMA-IR Homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance Quicki Quantitative insulin sensitivity check index, FGI Fasting glucose to insulin ratio.
Prevalence of Metabolic Syndrome factors in all overweight, obese, and extremely obese adolescents according to BMI and by gender
| AbdC >90thP (1)** | 55.0% | 30.4% | 54.5% | 87.0% | |
| TG ≥150 mg/dL(1)* | 18.5% | 15.9% | 13.0% | 29.6% | |
| HDLc <40 mg/dL(1)NS | 35.5% | 29.0% | 37.7% | 40.7% | |
| SBP-DBP ≥130/85(1)** | 21.0% | 10.1% | 18.2% | 38.9% | |
| Glycemia ≥100 mg/dL(2)NS | 2.0% | 2.9% | 1.3% | 1.9% | |
| | | ||||
| AbdC >90thP (2)** | 67.0% | 41.9% | 65.0% | 96.6% | |
| TG ≥150 mg/dL(2)NS | 19.0% | 12.9% | 15.0% | 31.0% | |
| HDLc <40 mg/dL(1)* | 41.0% | 22.6% | 47.5% | 51.7% | |
| SBP-DBP ≥130/85(2)** | 21.0% | 9.7% | 15.0% | 41.4% | |
| Glycemia ≥100 mg/dL(2)NS | 3.0% | 3.2% | 2.5% | 3.4% | |
| | | ||||
| AbdC >90thP(1)** | 43.0% | 21.1% | 43.2% | 76.0% | |
| TG ≥150 mg/dL(2)NS | 18.0% | 18.4% | 10.8% | 28.0% | |
| HDLc <40 mg/dL(1)NS | 30.0% | 34.2% | 27.0% | 28.0% | |
| SBP-DBP ≥130/85(2)* | 21.0% | 10.5% | 21.6% | 36.0% | |
| Glycemia ≥100 mg/dL(2)NS | 1.0% | 2.6% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Note: (1) Chi-square test.
(2) Fisher’s exact test.
* p < 0.05 **p < 0.01 NS not significant.
The same letters show no statistically significant difference.
AbdC Abdominal circumference, HDLc-HDL cholesterol, TG Triglycerides, SBP Systolic Blood Pressure, DBP Diastolic Blood Pressure.
Percentage of insulin-resistant adolescents according to method
| Insulin ≥12μU/mL | 64.0% | 74.0% | 54.0% |
| HOMA >3.16 | 43.5% | 54.0% | 33.0% |
| Quicki <0.313 | 25.0% | 32.0% | 18.0% |
| FGI <7.0 | 65.0% | 75.0% | 55.0% |