Literature DB >> 23362650

Lumbar spinal stenosis: treatment options for an aging population.

Roger P Jackson1, Anne C McManus, Jill Moore.   

Abstract

The fastest growing age group in the United States is the 45 and older population. Due to the nature of the aging lumbar spine, a significant majority of this population will experience low back pain (LBP) and symptoms associated with lumbar spinal stenosis. Accurate diagnosis and appropriate treatment is required if this particular aging group of our population is to maintain an active and productive life into their later years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23362650      PMCID: PMC6179593     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mo Med        ISSN: 0026-6620


  17 in total

1.  Genetic risk factors for lumbar disk disease.

Authors:  J C Marini
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-04-11       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 2.  Degenerative lumbar stenosis: diagnosis and management.

Authors:  A S Hilibrand; N Rand
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  1999 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.020

Review 3.  Degenerative spondylolisthesis: review of current trends and controversies.

Authors:  Dilip K Sengupta; Harry N Herkowitz
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-03-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 4.  Diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review of the accuracy of diagnostic tests.

Authors:  Irene de Graaf; Anneloes Prak; Sita Bierma-Zeinstra; Siep Thomas; Wilco Peul; Bart Koes
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-05-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Cost-effectiveness of the X-STOP® interspinous spacer for lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Grant Skidmore; Stacey J Ackerman; Christopher Bergin; Dan Ross; Jesse Butler; Manish Suthar; Joshua Rittenberg
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Long-term outcomes of surgical and nonsurgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis: 8 to 10 year results from the maine lumbar spine study.

Authors:  Steven J Atlas; Robert B Keller; Yen A Wu; Richard A Deyo; Daniel E Singer
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  A multicenter, prospective, randomized trial evaluating the X STOP interspinous process decompression system for the treatment of neurogenic intermittent claudication: two-year follow-up results.

Authors:  James F Zucherman; Ken Y Hsu; Charles A Hartjen; Thomas F Mehalic; Dante A Implicito; Michael J Martin; Donald R Johnson; Grant A Skidmore; Paul P Vessa; James W Dwyer; Stephen T Puccio; Joseph C Cauthen; Richard M Ozuna
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-06-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Mild procedure: single-site prospective IRB study.

Authors:  Sanghamitra Basu
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2012 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.442

Review 9.  The use of radiographic imaging studies in the evaluation of patients who have degenerative disorders of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  S D Boden
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 10.  Spinal stenosis: surgical versus nonsurgical treatment.

Authors:  Steven J Atlas; Anthony Delitto
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Biomechanics and Mechanism of Action of Indirect Lumbar Decompression and the Evolution of a Stand-alone Spinous Process Spacer.

Authors:  Steven M Falowski; Dawood Sayed; Timothy R Deer; Dane Brescacin; Kevin Liang
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 3.750

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.