Literature DB >> 23360550

Age-related changes in frequency of mind-wandering and task-related interferences during memory encoding and their impact on retrieval.

David Maillet1, M Natasha Rajah.   

Abstract

During the performance of cognitive tasks such as memory encoding, attention can become decoupled from the external environment and instead focused on internal thoughts related to the appraisal of the current task (task-related interferences; TRI), or personal thoughts unrelated to the task at hand (mind-wandering; MW). However, the association between the frequency of these thoughts experienced at encoding and retrieval accuracy in young and older adults remains poorly understood. In this study young and older adults encoded lists of words using one of two encoding tasks: judging whether words are man-made/natural (objective task), or whether they are pleasant/neutral (subjective task). We measured the frequency of TRI and MW at encoding, and related them to retrieval accuracy in both age groups. We found that encoding task influenced the type of internal thoughts experienced by young, but not older, adults: young exhibited greater MW in the subjective vs the objective task, and greater TRI in the objective vs subjective encoding task. Second, across both tasks we found marked age-related decreases in both MW and TRI at encoding, and frequency of these thoughts negatively impacted memory retrieval in young adults only. We discuss these findings in relation to current theories of ageing, attention and memory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23360550     DOI: 10.1080/09658211.2012.761714

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Memory        ISSN: 0965-8211


  14 in total

Review 1.  How often are thoughts metacognitive? Findings from research on self-regulated learning, think-aloud protocols, and mind-wandering.

Authors:  Megan L Jordano; Dayna R Touron
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-08

2.  Cognitive aging and the distinction between intentional and unintentional mind wandering.

Authors:  Paul Seli; David Maillet; Daniel Smilek; Jonathan M Oakman; Daniel L Schacter
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2017-05-04

3.  Mind-wandering and task stimuli: Stimulus-dependent thoughts influence performance on memory tasks and are more often past- versus future-oriented.

Authors:  David Maillet; Paul Seli; Daniel L Schacter
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2017-05-02

Review 4.  Reconceptualizing mind wandering from a switching perspective.

Authors:  Yi-Sheng Wong; Adrian R Willoughby; Liana Machado
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2022-03-29

Review 5.  From mind wandering to involuntary retrieval: Age-related differences in spontaneous cognitive processes.

Authors:  David Maillet; Daniel L Schacter
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  When the mind wanders: Distinguishing stimulus-dependent from stimulus-independent thoughts during incidental encoding in young and older adults.

Authors:  David Maillet; Daniel L Schacter
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2016-06

7.  Unraveling inner experiences during resting state.

Authors:  Juergen Fell
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-29       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  On the asymmetric effects of mind-wandering on levels of processing at encoding and retrieval.

Authors:  David R Thomson; Daniel Smilek; Derek Besner
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-06

9.  Thought probes during prospective memory encoding: Evidence for perfunctory processes.

Authors:  Michael K Scullin; Mark A McDaniel; Michelle N Dasse; Ji Hae Lee; Courtney A Kurinec; Claudina Tami; Madison L Krueger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Can mind-wandering be timeless? Atemporal focus and aging in mind-wandering paradigms.

Authors:  Jonathan D Jackson; Yana Weinstein; David A Balota
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-10-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.