Literature DB >> 27294717

When the mind wanders: Distinguishing stimulus-dependent from stimulus-independent thoughts during incidental encoding in young and older adults.

David Maillet1, Daniel L Schacter1.   

Abstract

In recent years, several studies have indicated that healthy older adults exhibit a reduction in mind-wandering compared with young adults. However, relatively little research has examined the extent to which ongoing thoughts in young and older adults are dependent on environmental stimuli. In the current study, we assessed age-related differences in frequency of stimulus-dependent thoughts (SDTs) and stimulus-independent thoughts (SITs) during a slow-paced incidental encoding task. Based on previous research suggesting that older adults rely on external information to a greater extent than young adults, we hypothesized that ongoing thoughts in older adults may be more stimulus-dependent than in young adults. We found that although older adults reported overall fewer thoughts compared to young adults, they exhibited a reduction in proportion of SITs and an increase in proportion of SDTs. In both age groups, SDTs were more frequently about the past compared with SITs, while SITs were more frequently about the future. Finally, the extent to which both young and older adults reported SDTs, but not SITs, at encoding was positively correlated with how often they reported remembering thoughts at retrieval, and SDT frequency was positively correlated with overall performance on the memory task in older adults. Our results provide evidence that ongoing thoughts in older adults may be more dependent on environmental stimuli than young adults, and that these thoughts may impact performance in recognition tasks. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27294717      PMCID: PMC4910642          DOI: 10.1037/pag0000099

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Aging        ISSN: 0882-7974


  46 in total

1.  A behavioral analysis of degree of reinforcement and ease of shifting to new responses in a Weigl-type card-sorting problem.

Authors:  D A GRANT; E A BERG
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1948-08

2.  Task unrelated thought whilst encoding information.

Authors:  Jonathan M Smallwood; Simona F Baracaia; Michelle Lowe; Marc Obonsawin
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2003-09

3.  Back to the future: autobiographical planning and the functionality of mind-wandering.

Authors:  Benjamin Baird; Jonathan Smallwood; Jonathan W Schooler
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2011-09-13

4.  Experiences of remembering, knowing, and guessing.

Authors:  J M Gardiner; C Ramponi; A Richardson-Klavehn
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  1998-03

5.  Effects of Individual Differences and Situational Features on Age Differences in Mindless Reading.

Authors:  Matthew C Shake; Leah J Shulley; Angelica M Soto-Freita
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 4.077

6.  Task-unrelated-thought frequency as a function of age: a laboratory study.

Authors:  Leonard M Giambra
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  1989-06

7.  Concern-induced negative affect is associated with the occurrence and content of mind-wandering.

Authors:  David Stawarczyk; Steve Majerus; Arnaud D'Argembeau
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2013-03-06

Review 8.  Source monitoring.

Authors:  M K Johnson; S Hashtroudi; D S Lindsay
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 17.737

9.  Goal Commitments and the content of thoughts and dreams: basic principles.

Authors:  Eric Klinger
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-07-11

10.  Can mind-wandering be timeless? Atemporal focus and aging in mind-wandering paradigms.

Authors:  Jonathan D Jackson; Yana Weinstein; David A Balota
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-10-16
View more
  8 in total

1.  Mind-wandering and task stimuli: Stimulus-dependent thoughts influence performance on memory tasks and are more often past- versus future-oriented.

Authors:  David Maillet; Paul Seli; Daniel L Schacter
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2017-05-02

2.  Deficits in spontaneous and stimulus-dependent retrieval as an early sign of abnormal aging.

Authors:  Michał Wereszczyński; Agnieszka Niedźwieńska
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 3.  Mind-Wandering as a Natural Kind: A Family-Resemblances View.

Authors:  Paul Seli; Michael J Kane; Jonathan Smallwood; Daniel L Schacter; David Maillet; Jonathan W Schooler; Daniel Smilek
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 20.229

4.  Default Network and Aging: Beyond the Task-Negative Perspective.

Authors:  David Maillet; Daniel L Schacter
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 20.229

5.  In Medio Stat Virtus: intermediate levels of mind wandering improve episodic memory encoding in a virtual environment.

Authors:  Philippe Blondé; Dominique Makowski; Marco Sperduti; Pascale Piolino
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2020-05-23

6.  Aging and the wandering brain: Age-related differences in the neural correlates of stimulus-independent thoughts.

Authors:  David Maillet; Roger E Beaty; Areeba Adnan; Kieran C R Fox; Gary R Turner; R Nathan Spreng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  A closer look at the timecourse of mind wandering: Pupillary responses and behaviour.

Authors:  Claudia Pelagatti; Paola Binda; Manila Vannucci
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Conversational Time Travel: Evidence of a Retrospective Bias in Real Life Conversations.

Authors:  Burcu Demiray; Matthias R Mehl; Mike Martin
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-11-13
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.