PURPOSE: To develop R2* mapping techniques corrected for confounding factors and optimized for noise performance. THEORY AND METHODS: Conventional R2* mapping is affected by two key confounding factors: noise-related bias and the presence of fat in tissue. Noise floor effects introduce bias in magnitude-based reconstructions, particularly at high R2* values. The presence of fat, if uncorrected, introduces severe protocol-dependent bias. In this work, the bias/noise properties of different R2* mapping reconstructions (magnitude- and complex-fitting, fat-uncorrected, and fat-corrected) are characterized using Cramer-Rao Bound analysis, simulations, and in vivo data. A framework for optimizing the choice of echo times is provided. Finally, the robustness of liver R2* mapping in the presence of fat is evaluated in 28 subjects. RESULTS: Fat-corrected R2* mapping removes fat-related bias without noise penalty over a wide range of R2* values. Complex nonlinear least-squares fitted and fat-corrected R2* reconstructions that account for the spectral complexity of fat provide robust R2* estimates with low bias and optimized noise performance over a wide range of echo times combinations and R2* values. CONCLUSION: The use of complex fitting and fat-correction improves the robustness, noise performance, and accuracy of R2* measurements, and are necessary to establish R2* as quantitative imaging biomarker in the liver.
PURPOSE: To develop R2* mapping techniques corrected for confounding factors and optimized for noise performance. THEORY AND METHODS: Conventional R2* mapping is affected by two key confounding factors: noise-related bias and the presence of fat in tissue. Noise floor effects introduce bias in magnitude-based reconstructions, particularly at high R2* values. The presence of fat, if uncorrected, introduces severe protocol-dependent bias. In this work, the bias/noise properties of different R2* mapping reconstructions (magnitude- and complex-fitting, fat-uncorrected, and fat-corrected) are characterized using Cramer-Rao Bound analysis, simulations, and in vivo data. A framework for optimizing the choice of echo times is provided. Finally, the robustness of liver R2* mapping in the presence of fat is evaluated in 28 subjects. RESULTS:Fat-corrected R2* mapping removes fat-related bias without noise penalty over a wide range of R2* values. Complex nonlinear least-squares fitted and fat-corrected R2* reconstructions that account for the spectral complexity of fat provide robust R2* estimates with low bias and optimized noise performance over a wide range of echo times combinations and R2* values. CONCLUSION: The use of complex fitting and fat-correction improves the robustness, noise performance, and accuracy of R2* measurements, and are necessary to establish R2* as quantitative imaging biomarker in the liver.
Authors: L J Anderson; S Holden; B Davis; E Prescott; C C Charrier; N H Bunce; D N Firmin; B Wonke; J Porter; J M Walker; D J Pennell Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2001-12 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Gavin Hamilton; Takeshi Yokoo; Mark Bydder; Irene Cruite; Michael E Schroeder; Claude B Sirlin; Michael S Middleton Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2010-12-12 Impact factor: 4.044
Authors: Rexford D Newbould; David R J Owen; Joseph Shalhoub; Andrew P Brown; Giulio Gambarota Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2011-07-18 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Catherine D G Hines; Rashmi Agni; Calista Roen; Ian Rowland; Diego Hernando; Eric Bultman; Debra Horng; Huanzhou Yu; Ann Shimakawa; Jean H Brittain; Scott B Reeder Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2011-11-29 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Bret H Goodpaster; V Andrew Stenger; Fernando Boada; Therese McKolanis; Denise Davis; Robert Ross; David E Kelley Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2004-05 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Gavin Hamilton; Michael S Middleton; Mark Bydder; Takeshi Yokoo; Jeffrey B Schwimmer; Yuko Kono; Heather M Patton; Joel E Lavine; Claude B Sirlin Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2009-07 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Kevin A Zand; Amol Shah; Elhamy Heba; Tanya Wolfson; Gavin Hamilton; Jessica Lam; Joshua Chen; Jonathan C Hooker; Anthony C Gamst; Michael S Middleton; Jeffrey B Schwimmer; Claude B Sirlin Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2015-04-03 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Camilo A Campo; Diego Hernando; Tilman Schubert; Candice A Bookwalter; Andrew J Van Pay; Scott B Reeder Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2017-07-13 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Huiwen Luo; Ante Zhu; Curtis N Wiens; Jitka Starekova; Ann Shimakawa; Scott B Reeder; Kevin M Johnson; Diego Hernando Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2020-08-01 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Aaryani Tipirneni-Sajja; Ralf B Loeffler; Axel J Krafft; Andrea N Sajewski; Robert J Ogg; Jane S Hankins; Claudia M Hillenbrand Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2018-10-25 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Ramin Jafari; Stefanie J Hectors; Anne K Koehne de González; Pascal Spincemaille; Martin R Prince; Gary M Brittenham; Yi Wang Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2020-09-22 Impact factor: 4.044