| Literature DB >> 23358805 |
Abstract
The theory of embodied music cognition states that the perception and cognition of music is firmly, although not exclusively, linked to action patterns associated with that music. In this regard, the focus lies mostly on how music promotes certain action tendencies (i.e., dance, entrainment, etc.). Only recently, studies have started to devote attention to the reciprocal effects that people's body movements may exert on how people perceive certain aspects of music and sound (e.g., pitch, meter, musical preference, etc.). The present study positions itself in this line of research. The central research question is whether expressive body movements, which are systematically paired with music, can modulate children's perception of musical expressiveness. We present a behavioral experiment in which different groups of children (7-8 years, N = 46) either repetitively performed a happy or a sad choreography in response to expressively ambiguous music or merely listened to that music. The results of our study show indeed that children's perception of musical expressiveness is modulated in accordance with the expressive character of the dance choreography performed to the music. This finding supports theories that claim a strong connection between action and perception, although further research is needed to uncover the details of this connection.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23358805 PMCID: PMC3554646 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054682
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Schematic representation of the experimental design.
Summary of the movement features extracted from the SAD and HAPPY choreography with the statistics of the differences between both (where possible).
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| SAD | HAPPY | |||||
| Velocity-chest (m/s) | 45×106 | −51.16 | <.01 | .33 | 0.33 | 0.53 |
| Velocity-hand (m/s) | 20×106 | −96.77 | <.01 | .62 | 0.51 | 1.80 |
| Acceleration-chest (m/s2) | 53×106 | −34.54 | <.01 | .22 | 0.55×10−2 | 0.89×10−2 |
| Acceleration-hand (m/s2) | 35×106 | −67.24 | <.01 | .43 | 0.94×10−2 | 0.03 |
| Height-chest (m) | 32×106 | −74.41 | <.01 | .48 | 1.21 | 1.24 |
| Height-hand (m) | 39×106 | −59.76 | <.01 | .39 | 0.81 | 0.98 |
| Rotational speed (deg/sec) | 30×107 | −66.10 | <.01 | .27 | 14 | 44 |
| Impulsiveness-hand | 116 | −6.58 | <.01 | .74 | 0.01 | 0.05 |
| Distance between hands (m) | 44×106 | −50.81 | <.01 | .32 | 0.70 | 0.78 |
| Covered horizontal distance-chest (m) | 21.01 (SAD) | 26.58 (HAPPY) | ||||
| Covered horizontal distance-hand (m) | 34.59 (SAD) | 95.52 (HAPPY) | ||||
| Covered vertical distance-chest (m) | 4.77 (SAD) | 18.95 (HAPPY) | ||||
| Covered vertical distance-hand (m) | 9.85 (SAD) | 54.6 (HAPPY) | ||||
Overview of the bipolar adjectives (translated from Dutch to English) used in the semantic differential scales.
| Bipolar adjectives | ||
| 1 | miserable | gay |
| 2 | calm | busy |
| 3 | stagnated | motile |
| 4 | unsafe | safe |
| 5 | slow | fast |
| 6 | sad | happy |
| 7 | brute | kind |
| 8 | bleak | snug |
| 9 | grey | abloom |
| 10 | lonely | cosy |
| 11 | touching | cheerful |
| 12 | discontent | content |
| 13 | lazy | energetic |
| 14 | gloomy | merry |
Figure 2Schematic representation of the data structures used in the analysis.
Figure 3Representation of the mean (with standard error bars) of the ratings related to each semantic differential scale for the HAPPY condition (N = 28) and SAD condition (N = 28).
Results of the statistical Mann-Whitney U tests indicating the differences in rating on each semantic differential scale (see Fig. 2) between the SAD condition (N = 28) and the HAPPY condition (N = 28) with scale 1 = miserable-gay, 2 = calm-busy, 3 = stagnated-motile, 4 = unsafe-safe, 5 = slow-fast, 6 = sad-happy, 7 = brute-kind, 8 = bleak-snug, 9 = grey-abloom, 10 = lonely-cosy, 11 = touching-cheerful, 12 = discontent-content, 13 = lazy energetic, and 14 = gloomy-merry.
| Scale | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 |
|
| 3.5 | 1 | 4 | 3.5 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 3.5 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
|
| 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
|
| 322 | 276 | 241 | 279 | 193 | 271 | 362 | 300 | 331 | 202 | 288 | 242 | 279 | 313 |
|
| −1.24 | −2.01 | −2.91 | −1.96 | −3.41 | −2.27 | −.53 | −1.63 | −1.12 | −3.35 | −1.85 | −2.75 | −1.98 | −1.43 |
|
| .225 | .046 | .003 | .049 | .001 | .023 | .611 | .104 | .264 | .001 | .065 | .006 | .047 | .155 |
|
| .17 | .27 | .39 | .26 | .46 | .30 | .07 | .22 | .15 | .45 | .25 | .37 | .26 | .19 |
Loadings related to the first two PCs obtained from the PCA of the 14 semantic differential scales.
| Loading PC1 | Adjective | Loading PC2 | Adjective |
| .4412 | abloom | .4985 | busy |
| .3693 | cheerful | .4708 | fast |
| .3478 | cosy | .3726 | energetic |
| .3320 | content | .3156 | motile |
| .3295 | secure | .2818 | merry |
| .2963 | snug | .2509 | gay |
| .2726 | kind | .2001 | grey |
| .2589 | gay | .1864 | brute |
| .2151 | happy | .1795 | happy |
| .2125 | merry | .1251 | touching |
| .0784 | energetic | .1013 | content |
| .0331 | slow | .0820 | anxious |
| .0252 | motile | .0680 | bleak |
| .0184 | calm | .0663 | cosy |
| −.0184 | busy | −.0663 | lonely |
| −.0252 | stagnated | −.0680 | snug |
| −.0331 | fast | −.0820 | secure |
| −.0784 | lazy | −.1013 | discontent |
| −.2125 | gloomy | −.1251 | cheerful |
| −.2151 | sad | −.1795 | sad |
| −.2589 | miserable | −0.1864 | kind |
| −.2726 | brute | −.2001 | abloom |
| −.2963 | bleak | −.2509 | miserable |
| −.3295 | anxious | −.2818 | gloomy |
| −.3320 | discontent | −.3156 | stagnated |
| −.3478 | lonely | −.3726 | lazy |
| −.3693 | touching | −.4708 | slow |
| −.4412 | grey | −.4985 | calm |
Figure 4Left: Representation of the component scores (diamonds and crosses) and (scaled) loadings obtained from the PCA. Right: boxplots indicating the distributions of the component scores on the first two PCs.
Figure 5Representation of the mean (with standard error bars) of the ratings related to all 14 semantic differential scales per condition, and per musical excerpt.