Arthur M Glenberg1,2. 1. Department of Psychology, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, 85287, USA. 2. Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, 53706, USA.
Abstract
A basic claim of the embodiment framework is that all psychological processes are influenced by body morphology, sensory systems, motor systems, and emotions. As such, the framework holds the promise of providing a unifying perspective for psychological research. This article begins with a sketch of several arguments, from evolution to philosophy, as to why the embodiment framework is a good bet. These arguments are followed by a review of approaches to embodiment, including those from cognitive linguistics, perceptual symbol theory, and action-based theories. Finally, examples are provided for how a unifying perspective might work for cognition (including language and memory), cognitive and social development, social psychology, neuroscience, clinical psychology, and psychology applied to education.
A basic claim of the embodiment framework is that all psychological processes are influenced by body morphology, sensory systems, motor systems, and emotions. As such, the framework holds the promise of providing a unifying perspective for psychological research. This article begins with a sketch of several arguments, from evolution to philosophy, as to why the embodiment framework is a good bet. These arguments are followed by a review of approaches to embodiment, including those from cognitive linguistics, perceptual symbol theory, and action-based theories. Finally, examples are provided for how a unifying perspective might work for cognition (including language and memory), cognitive and social development, social psychology, neuroscience, clinical psychology, and psychology applied to education.
Authors: Andrew James Anderson; Jeffrey R Binder; Leonardo Fernandino; Colin J Humphries; Lisa L Conant; Rajeev D S Raizada; Feng Lin; Edmund C Lalor Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2019-09-30 Impact factor: 6.167