Literature DB >> 8618604

Prediction of the need for intensive care in patients who come to emergency departments with acute chest pain.

L Goldman1, E F Cook, P A Johnson, D A Brand, G W Rouan, T H Lee.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients who come to the emergency department with chest pain are a heterogeneous group. Some have ischemic heart disease that may lead to serious complications, whereas others have minor disorders. We performed a study to identify clinical factors that predict which patients will have complications requiring intensive care.
METHODS: We first studied 10,682 patients with acute chest pain at seven hospitals between 1984 and 1986 (derivation set) to identify potential clinical predictors of the development of major complications. We then validated these predictors in a separate set of 4676 patients at one hospital between 1990 and 1994 (validation set).
RESULTS: In the derivation set of patients, we identified the following set of clinical features, which, if present in the emergency department, were associated with an increased risk of complications: ST-segment elevation or Q waves on the electrocardiogram thought to indicate acute myocardial infarction, other electrocardiographic changes indicating myocardial ischemia, low systolic blood pressure, pulmonary rales above the bases, or an exacerbation of known ischemic heart disease. On the basis of these criteria, the patients in the validation set were stratified into four groups, with the risk of major complications in the first 12 hours ranging from 0.15 to 8 percent. After 12 hours, the probability of a major complication could be updated on the basis of whether the patient had already had a complication of major severity, a complication of intermediate severity, or a myocardial infarction (independent relative risks, 18.9, 7.7 and 4.0, respectively, as compared with patients without prior complications or myocardial infarction).
CONCLUSIONS: The risk of major complications in patients with acute chest pain can be estimated on the basis of the clinical presentation and new clinical observations made during the hospital course. These estimates of risk help in making rational decisions about the appropriate level of medical care for patients with acute chest pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8618604     DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199606063342303

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  60 in total

1.  Myth: identifying classic coronary risk factors helps to predict the likelihood of acute ischemia.

Authors:  H Patel; M E Herbert
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  2000-12

2.  Heparin should be administered to every patient admitted to the hospital with possible unstable angina.

Authors:  G S Brewster; M E Herbert
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  2000-08

3.  Diagnostic accuracy of the TIMI risk score in patients with chest pain in the emergency department: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Erik P Hess; Dipti Agarwal; Subhash Chandra; Mohammed H Murad; Patricia J Erwin; Judd E Hollander; Victor M Montori; Ian G Stiell
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2010-06-07       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Development and validation of a disease-specific risk adjustment system using automated clinical data.

Authors:  Ying P Tabak; Xiaowu Sun; Karen G Derby; Stephen G Kurtz; Richard S Johannes
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Diagnostic classification in patients with suspected deep venous thrombosis: physicians' judgement or a decision rule?

Authors:  Geert-Jan Geersing; Kristel J Janssen; Ruud Oudega; Henk van Weert; Henri Stoffers; Arno Hoes; Karel Moons
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  Incidence of adverse cardiovascular events in adults following drug overdose.

Authors:  Alex F Manini; Lewis S Nelson; Barry Stimmel; David Vlahov; Robert S Hoffman
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 3.451

7.  Evaluation of guidelines for the use of telemetry in the non-intensive-care setting.

Authors:  C A Estrada; H S Rosman; N K Prasad; G Battilana; M Alexander; A C Held; M J Young
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Identification of patients with evolving coronary syndromes by using statistical models with data from the time of presentation.

Authors:  R L Kennedy; R F Harrison
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-06-06       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 9.  Coronary CT angiography in emergency department patients with acute chest pain: triple rule-out protocol versus dedicated coronary CT angiography.

Authors:  Hwa Yeon Lee; Seung Min Yoo; Charles S White
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2008-10-14       Impact factor: 2.357

10.  Comparison of traditional cardiovascular risk models and coronary atherosclerotic plaque as detected by computed tomography for prediction of acute coronary syndrome in patients with acute chest pain.

Authors:  Maros Ferencik; Christopher L Schlett; Fabian Bamberg; Quynh A Truong; John H Nichols; Antonio J Pena; Michael D Shapiro; Ian S Rogers; Sujith Seneviratne; Blair Alden Parry; Ricardo C Cury; Thomas J Brady; David F Brown; John T Nagurney; Udo Hoffmann
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 3.451

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.