Literature DB >> 23355142

Evaluation of ultrasound for identification of abdominal wall myofascial components by novice learners.

Joseph F Sucher1, Calvin Lyons, Nilson Salas, Vadim Sherman, Brian Dunkin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive components separation (MICS) is believed to decrease wound complications by reducing local tissue damage and eliminating the interruption of blood supply to the overlying skin and soft tissue. One drawback to the MICS technique is the difficulty with identifying the correct location for entry into the anterior abdominal wall. We believe that ultrasound can be used to visually assist identification of the correct surgical entry site (the avascular space between the external and internal abdominal oblique muscles, lateral to the linea semilunaris).
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess if novices can readily learn an ultrasound technique for identifying abdominal wall myofascial components via a video education tool.
METHODS: This research was an institutional review board-approved, prospective, observational study. Ten surgical residents were asked to watch a 1-min training video containing basic instructions on ultrasound technique for identifying the myofascial anatomy of the anterior abdominal wall. After watching the educational video, the subjects were asked to identify the linea semilunaris first by external anatomy, then by ultrasound. A grader, blinded to the identification of the subject, recorded if the subject correctly identified the location of the linea semilunaris by each method (external anatomy only versus ultrasound guided).
RESULTS: Ten subjects were evaluated. Nine of ten (90 %) subjects correctly identified the linea semilunaris with ultrasound. Only three of ten (30 %) subjects correctly identified the linea semilunaris by physical exam.
CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound technology can aid in identification of the abdominal wall musculofascial units in MICS and be easily taught via short video instruction to novices with excellent results. Further studies will be necessary to prove that ultrasound use can decrease complications associated with entry into the appropriate avascular space between the external and internal abdominal oblique muscles, lateral to the linea semilunaris.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23355142     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-012-2693-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  20 in total

1.  A modification of the "components separation" technique for closure of abdominal wall defects in the presence of an enterostomy.

Authors:  S M Maas; M van Engeland; N G Leeksma; R P Bleichrodt
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 6.113

2.  Endoscopically assisted "components separation technique" for the repair of complicated ventral hernias.

Authors:  Sylvester M Maas; ReilinghTammo S de Vries; Harry van Goor; Dick de Jong; Robert P Bleichrodt
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 6.113

3.  Endoscopic versus open component separation in complex abdominal wall reconstruction.

Authors:  Karem C Harth; Michael J Rosen
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  Minimally invasive components separation--an updated method for closure of abdominal wall defects.

Authors:  Michael W Parra; Edgar B Rodas
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 1.878

5.  "Components separation" method for closure of abdominal-wall defects: an anatomic and clinical study.

Authors:  O M Ramirez; E Ruas; A L Dellon
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 4.730

6.  Management of recurrent hernia after components separation: 10-year experience with abdominal wall reconstruction at an academic medical center.

Authors:  Charles S Hultman; Winnie M Y Tong; Benjamin J Kittinger; Bruce Cairns; D Wayne Overby; Preston B Rich
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.539

7.  Outcome of components separation for contaminated complex abdominal wall defects.

Authors:  S Yegiyants; M Tam; D J Lee; M A Abbas
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2011-07-24       Impact factor: 4.739

8.  Utilization of human cadaveric acellular dermis for abdominal hernia reconstruction.

Authors:  Antonio Espinosa-de-los-Monteros; Jorge I de la Torre; Ian Marrero; Patricio Andrades; Michael R Davis; Luis O Vásconez
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 1.539

9.  Recalcitrant abdominal wall hernias: long-term superiority of autologous tissue repair.

Authors:  John A Girotto; Michael Chiaramonte; Nathan G Menon; Navin Singh; Ron Silverman; Anthony P Tufaro; Maurice Nahabedian; Nelson H Goldberg; Paul N Manson
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.730

10.  Soft polypropylene mesh, but not cadaveric dermis, significantly improves outcomes in midline hernia repairs using the components separation technique.

Authors:  Jason H Ko; David M Salvay; Benjamin C Paul; Edward C Wang; Gregory A Dumanian
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 4.730

View more
  1 in total

1.  The feasibility and reliability of measuring forearm muscle thickness by ultrasound in a geriatric inpatient setting: a cross-sectional pilot study.

Authors:  Delky Meza-Valderrama; Dolores Sánchez-Rodríguez; Stany Perkisas; Xavi Duran; Sophie Bastijns; Vanesa Dávalos-Yerovi; Elizabeth Da Costa; Ester Marco
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 3.921

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.