Literature DB >> 17471129

Utilization of human cadaveric acellular dermis for abdominal hernia reconstruction.

Antonio Espinosa-de-los-Monteros1, Jorge I de la Torre, Ian Marrero, Patricio Andrades, Michael R Davis, Luis O Vásconez.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Incisional hernias with history of recurrence or infection remain a challenge, with high postoperative morbidity and recurrence rates. The purpose of this study is to evaluate outcomes of patients treated with human cadaveric acellular dermis as an adjunct to abdominal wall reconstruction.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 39 abdominal wall reconstructions with human cadaveric acellular dermis performed in 37 patients and compared them with 39 randomly selected cases.
RESULTS: There is a significant decrease in recurrence rates when human cadaveric acellular dermis is added as an overlay to primary closure plus rectus muscle advancement and imbrication in patients with medium-sized hernias. No differences were observed when adding human cadaveric acellular dermis as an overlay to patients with large-size hernias treated with underlay mesh. The use of human cadaveric acellular dermis did not increase postoperative morbidity rates.
CONCLUSIONS: Improved results with human cadaveric acellular dermis are obtained by achieving tension-free repairs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17471129     DOI: 10.1097/01.sap.0000254410.91132.a8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Plast Surg        ISSN: 0148-7043            Impact factor:   1.539


  25 in total

1.  Violation of the rectus complex is not a contraindication to component separation for abdominal wall reconstruction.

Authors:  Patrick B Garvey; Chad M Bailey; Donald P Baumann; Jun Liu; Charles E Butler
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2011-12-09       Impact factor: 6.113

2.  Human acellular dermal matrix for ventral hernia repair reduces morbidity in transplant patients.

Authors:  M B Brewer; E M Rada; M L Milburn; N H Goldberg; D P Singh; M Cooper; R P Silverman
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 3.  A novel tool to evaluate bias in literature on use of biologic mesh in abdominal wall hernia repair.

Authors:  J Con; L Zarain; S Gogna; D J Samson; K Prabhakaran; S Gashi; E Tilley; R Latifi
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 4.739

4.  Arcus-anchored acellular dermal graft compared to anterior colporrhaphy for stage II cystoceles and beyond.

Authors:  Sylvia M Botros; Peter K Sand; Jennifer L Beaumont; Yoram Abramov; Jay James Miller; Roger P Goldberg
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2009-06-17

Review 5.  A review of tissue-engineered skin bioconstructs available for skin reconstruction.

Authors:  Rostislav V Shevchenko; Stuart L James; S Elizabeth James
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 4.118

6.  Abdominal wall reconstruction in patients with digestive tract fistulas.

Authors:  Eric K Johnson; Pamela L Tushoski
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2010-09

7.  Evaluation of ultrasound for identification of abdominal wall myofascial components by novice learners.

Authors:  Joseph F Sucher; Calvin Lyons; Nilson Salas; Vadim Sherman; Brian Dunkin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-01-26       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  The use of indocyanine green angiography to prevent wound complications in ventral hernia repair with open components separation technique.

Authors:  H D Wang; D P Singh
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 4.739

9.  Prosthetic abdominal wall hernia repair in emergency surgery: from polypropylene to biological meshes.

Authors:  G Campanelli; F Catena; L Ansaloni
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2008-12-04       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  Abdominal wall reconstruction with mesh and components separation.

Authors:  Lior Heller; Chuma Chike-Obi; Amy Shengnan Xue
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.314

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.