Literature DB >> 19403236

Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy: technical modifications in 2009.

Mani Menon1, Alok Shrivastava, Mahendra Bhandari, Ramgopal Satyanarayana, Siddharth Siva, Piyush K Agarwal.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Since we last published our technique of robotic prostatectomy, we have introduced three technical refinements: superveil nerve sparing, bladder drainage with a percutaneous suprapubic tube (PST), and limited node dissection of the obturator and internal iliac nodes in preference to the external iliac nodes in selected patients.
OBJECTIVE: To describe selection criteria, to explain the three techniques, and to evaluate functional and oncologic results. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Single-institution study of 1151 radical prostatectomies performed from 2006 to 2008 by one surgeon. SURGICAL PROCEDURE: The superveil nerve-sparing technique spares nerves from the 11-o'clock position to the 1-o'clock position. The bladder is drained with a PST rather than a urethral catheter. For low- or intermediate-risk disease, limited lymphadenectomy concentrates on the internal iliac and obturator nodes, excluding the external iliac lymph nodes. MEASUREMENTS: Erectile function and patient comfort were evaluated using questionnaires administered by a third party. Lymph node yield was quantified by a qualified uropathologist. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: At 6-18 months after surgery, 94% of men who attempted sexual intercourse were successful with a median Sexual Health Inventory For Men (SHIM) score of 18 out of 25. PST bladder drainage resulted in less patient discomfort; visual analog scores were 2 at 2 days after prostatectomy and 0 at 6 days after prostatectomy. The modified lymphadenectomy harvested few overall nodes, but it increased the yield of positive nodes >13-fold in patients with low-risk stratification (6.7% compared with 0.5%).
CONCLUSION: In this single-institution, single-surgeon study, these modifications improved erectile function outcomes, decreased catheter-associated discomfort, and enhanced the detection of positive nodes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19403236     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.04.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  29 in total

1.  [Radical prostatectomy - pro robotic].

Authors:  R Gillitzer
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Effect of dorsal vascular complex size on the recovery of continence after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Chang Wook Jeong; Jong Jin Oh; Seong Jin Jeong; Sung Kyu Hong; Seok-Soo Byun; Sung Il Hwang; Hak Jong Lee; Sang Eun Lee
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-03-24       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Are We Improving Erectile Function Recovery After Radical Prostatectomy? Analysis of Patients Treated over the Last Decade.

Authors:  Paolo Capogrosso; Emily A Vertosick; Nicole E Benfante; James A Eastham; Peter J Scardino; Andrew J Vickers; John P Mulhall
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 4.  Current status of various neurovascular bundle-sparing techniques in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Anup Kumar; Sarvesh Tandon; Srinivas Samavedi; Vladimir Mouraviev; Anthony S Bates; Vipul R Patel
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2016-06-01

Review 5.  [Prostate cancer: an update].

Authors:  M Hohenfellner
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 0.639

6.  Functional outcomes of clinically high-risk prostate cancer patients treated with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a multi-institutional analysis.

Authors:  F Abdollah; D Dalela; A Sood; J Sammon; R Cho; L Nocera; M Diaz; W Jeong; J O Peabody; N Fossati; G Gandaglia; A Briganti; F Montorsi; M Menon
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 5.554

Review 7.  Robotic surgery in urologic oncology: gathering the evidence.

Authors:  Ted A Skolarus; Yun Zhang; Brent K Hollenbeck
Journal:  Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.217

8.  Specific learning curve for port placement and docking of da Vinci(®) Surgical System: one surgeon's experience in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  F Dal Moro; S Secco; C Valotto; W Artibani; F Zattoni
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2011-09-27

9.  Functional outcomes following robotic prostatectomy using athermal, traction free risk-stratified grades of nerve sparing.

Authors:  Ashutosh K Tewari; Adnan Ali; Sheela Metgud; Nithin Theckumparampil; Abhishek Srivastava; Francesca Khani; Brian D Robinson; Naveen Gumpeni; Maria M Shevchuk; Matthieu Durand; Prasanna Sooriakumaran; Jinyi Li; Robert Leung; Alexandra Peyser; Siobhan Gruschow; Vinita Asija; Niyati Harneja
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-01-26       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 10.  Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Maneuvers to Attenuate Erectile Dysfunction: Technical Description and Video Compilation.

Authors:  Spyridon P Basourakos; Keith Kowalczyk; Marcio Covas Moschovas; Vanessa Dudley; Andrew J Hung; Jonathan E Shoag; Vipul Patel; Jim C Hu
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2021-11       Impact factor: 2.942

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.