Literature DB >> 21244602

The impact of cavernosal nerve preservation on continence after robotic radical prostatectomy.

Donald L Pick1, Kathryn Osann, Douglas Skarecky, Navneet Narula, David S Finley, Thomas E Ahlering.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: • To evaluate associations between baseline characteristics, nerve-sparing (NS) status and return of continence, as a relationship may exist between return to continence and preservation of the neurovascular bundles for potency during radical prostatectomy (RP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: • The study included 592 consecutive robotic RPs completed between 2002 and 2007. • All data were entered prospectively into an electronic database. • Continence data (defined as zero pads) was collected using self-administered validated questionnaires. • Baseline characteristics (age, International Index of Erectile Function [IIEF-5] score, American Urological Association symptom score, body mass index [BMI], clinical T-stage, Gleason score, and prostate-specific antigen level), NS status and learning curve were retrospectively evaluated for association with overall continence at 1, 3 and 12 months after RP using univariate and multivariable methods. • Any patient taking preoperative phosphodiesterase inhibitors was excluded from the postoperative analysis.
RESULTS: • Complete data were available for 537 of 592 patients (91%). • Continence rates at 12 months after RP were 89.2%, 88.9% and 84.8% for bilateral NS, unilateral NS and non-NS respectively (P= 0.56). • In multivariable analysis age, IIEF-5 score and BMI were significant independent predictors of continence. • CavernosalNS status did not significantly affect continence after adjusting for other co-variables.
CONCLUSION: • After careful multivariable analysis of baseline characteristics age, IIEF-5 score and BMI affected continence in a statistically significant fashion. This suggests that baseline factors and not the physical preservation of the cavernosal nerves predict overall return to continence.
© 2010 THE AUTHORS. BJU INTERNATIONAL © 2010 BJU INTERNATIONAL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21244602      PMCID: PMC4230821          DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.10015.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  17 in total

1.  Re: Intraoperative nerve stimulation with measurement of urethral sphincter pressure changes during radical retropubic prostatectomy: a feasibility study. C. P. Nelson, J. E. Montie, E. J. McGuire, G. Wedemeyer and J.T. Wei. J Urol, 169: 2225-2228, 2003.

Authors:  U H G Michl; D Lange; M Graefen; H Huland
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Intraoperative nerve stimulation with measurement of urethral sphincter pressure changes during radical retropubic prostatectomy: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Caleb P Nelson; James E Montie; Edward J McGuire; Gary Wedemeyer; John T Wei
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 3.  Open versus laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Part II.

Authors:  Laurent Salomon; Philippe Sèbe; Alexandre De La Taille; Dimitri Vordos; Andras Hoznek; René Yiou; Dominique Chopin; Claude C Abbou
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.588

4.  Nerve sparing open radical retropubic prostatectomy--does it have an impact on urinary continence?

Authors:  Fiona C Burkhard; Thomas M Kessler; Achim Fleischmann; George N Thalmann; Martin Schumacher; Urs E Studer
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Feasibility study for robotic radical prostatectomy cautery-free neurovascular bundle preservation.

Authors:  Thomas E Ahlering; Louis Eichel; David Chou; Douglas W Skarecky
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  Urinary and sexual function after radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer: the Prostate Cancer Outcomes Study.

Authors:  J L Stanford; Z Feng; A S Hamilton; F D Gilliland; R A Stephenson; J W Eley; P C Albertsen; L C Harlan; A L Potosky
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-01-19       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Potency, continence and complications in 3,477 consecutive radical retropubic prostatectomies.

Authors:  Shilajit D Kundu; Kimberly A Roehl; Scott E Eggener; Jo Ann V Antenor; Misop Han; William J Catalona
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: oncologic and functional results of 184 cases.

Authors:  Alexander Mottrie; Peter Van Migem; Geert De Naeyer; Peter Schatteman; Paul Carpentier; Etienne Fonteyne
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2007-02-20       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  Anatomic bladder neck preservation during robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: description of technique and outcomes.

Authors:  Marcos P Freire; Aaron C Weinberg; Yin Lei; Jane R Soukup; Stuart R Lipsitz; Sandip M Prasad; Fernando Korkes; Tiffany Lin; Jim C Hu
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2009-09-12       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 10.  Update on robotic laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Garrett S Matsunaga; Thomas E Ahlering; Douglas W Skarecky
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2006-02-17
View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  Short-, Intermediate-, and Long-term Quality of Life Outcomes Following Radical Prostatectomy for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Vinay Prabhu; Ted Lee; Tyler R McClintock; Herbert Lepor
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2013

2.  Simple method to predict return of continence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Douglas Skarecky; Blanca Morales; Alexandra Chang; Thomas Ahlering
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 3.  Neural supply of the male urethral sphincter: comprehensive anatomical review and implications for continence recovery after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Thomas Bessede; Prasanna Sooriakumaran; Atsushi Takenaka; Ash Tewari
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 4.  Preserving continence during robotic prostatectomy.

Authors:  Thomas E Ahlering; Adam Gordon; Blanca Morales; Douglas W Skarecky
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.092

5.  Investigation of factors affecting hypothermic pelvic tissue cooling using bio-heat simulation based on MRI-segmented anatomic models.

Authors:  Yuting Lin; Wei-Ching Lin; Peter T Fwu; Tzu-Ching Shih; Lee-Ren Yeh; Min-Ying Su; Jeon-Hor Chen
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2015-07-13       Impact factor: 5.428

6.  Functional outcomes following robotic prostatectomy using athermal, traction free risk-stratified grades of nerve sparing.

Authors:  Ashutosh K Tewari; Adnan Ali; Sheela Metgud; Nithin Theckumparampil; Abhishek Srivastava; Francesca Khani; Brian D Robinson; Naveen Gumpeni; Maria M Shevchuk; Matthieu Durand; Prasanna Sooriakumaran; Jinyi Li; Robert Leung; Alexandra Peyser; Siobhan Gruschow; Vinita Asija; Niyati Harneja
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-01-26       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Quantification of Long-term Stability and Specific Relief of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS) After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy.

Authors:  Adam Gordon; Douglas Skarecky; Kathryn Osann; Louis Eichel; Harleen Dhaliwal; Blanca Morales; Thomas Ahlering
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  [Stress incontinence after prostatectomy in treatment reality: results from a rehabilitation clinic].

Authors:  V Lent; H M Schultheis; L Strauß; M K Laaser; S Buntrock
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 9.  Literature review of factors affecting continence after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Dalibor Pacik; Michal Fedorko
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.484

10.  Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy after the first decade: surgical evolution or new paradigm.

Authors:  Douglas W Skarecky
Journal:  ISRN Urol       Date:  2013-04-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.