| Literature DB >> 23353684 |
Amy R Wyatt1, Patrick Constantinescu, Heath Ecroyd, Christopher M Dobson, Mark R Wilson, Janet R Kumita, Justin J Yerbury.
Abstract
α(2)-Macroglobulin (α(2)M) is an extracellular chaperone that inhibits amorphous and fibrillar protein aggregation. The reaction of α(2)M with proteases results in an 'activated' conformation, where the proteases become covalently-linked within the interior of a cage-like structure formed by α(2)M. This study investigates, the effect of activation on the ability of α(2)M to inhibit amyloid formation by Aβ(1-42) and I59T human lysozyme and shows that protease-activated α(2)M can act via two distinct mechanisms: (i) by trapping proteases that remain able to degrade polypeptide chains and (ii) by a chaperone action that prevents misfolded clients from continuing along the amyloid forming pathway.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23353684 PMCID: PMC3581772 DOI: 10.1016/j.febslet.2013.01.020
Source DB: PubMed Journal: FEBS Lett ISSN: 0014-5793 Impact factor: 4.124
Fig. 1Effects of α2M variants on I59T lysozyme fibril formation. (a) In vitro fibril formation of I59T lysozyme incubated alone (black), with native α2M (red), with trypsin-α2M (blue) or with NH4Cl-activated α2M (green) using α2M-to-lysozyme molar ratios of 1:10. (b) Percent of maximum ThT signal at the endpoint of aggregation. Each bar represents an average of three individual experiments. (c) TEM analysis of the endpoint samples in the absence or presence of the different α2M variants, with scale bars representing 100 nm and numbers corresponding to the lanes in gel analysis. (d) SDS–PAGE of the endpoint supernatants shows no soluble protein in I59T lysozyme incubated alone (1), whereas soluble protein is present for samples containing native α2M (2), trypsin-α2M (3) and NH4Cl-activated α2M (4). Soluble I59T lysozyme is shown in lane S and lane M shows molecular mass markers. (e) SDS–PAGE of the solubilized endpoint pellets showing a significant quantity of protein present for I59T incubated alone (1p), and also trace quantities of protein present for samples containing native α2M (2p), trypsin-α2M (3p) and NH4Cl-activated α2M (4p).
Fig. 2Effects of α2M variants on Aβ1–42 fibril formation. (a) In vitro fibril formation of Aβ1–42, incubated alone (black), with native α2M (red), with trypsin-α2M (blue), with (i)trypsin-α2M (blue circles) or with NH4Cl-activated α2M (green), using α2M-to-Aβ1–42 molar ratios of 1:10. (b) Percent of maximum ThT signal at the endpoint of aggregation. Each bar represents the average of three individual experiments. (c) TEM analysis of the endpoint samples in the absence or presence of the different α2M variants, with scale bars representing 100 nm and numbers corresponding to the lanes in gel analysis. (d) SDS–PAGE analysis of the endpoint supernatants shows no soluble protein for Aβ1–42 incubated alone (1), but soluble peptide present when incubated with native α2M (2). Incubation with trypsin-α2M (3) results in no full-length Aβ1–42 peptide, whereas the incubation with (i)trypsin-α2M (4) and NH4Cl-activated α2M (5) have full-length peptide present. Lane M shows molecular mass markers. (d) Fluorescence image of SDS–PAGE analysis of HiLyte-488 labelled Aβ1–42, alone (lane 1) and after incubation with trypsin-α2M (lane 2) or (i)trypsin-α2M (lane 3). The presence of trypsin-α2M results in an increase in Aβ1–42 fragments (red arrow).