Literature DB >> 23353684

Protease-activated alpha-2-macroglobulin can inhibit amyloid formation via two distinct mechanisms.

Amy R Wyatt1, Patrick Constantinescu, Heath Ecroyd, Christopher M Dobson, Mark R Wilson, Janet R Kumita, Justin J Yerbury.   

Abstract

α(2)-Macroglobulin (α(2)M) is an extracellular chaperone that inhibits amorphous and fibrillar protein aggregation. The reaction of α(2)M with proteases results in an 'activated' conformation, where the proteases become covalently-linked within the interior of a cage-like structure formed by α(2)M. This study investigates, the effect of activation on the ability of α(2)M to inhibit amyloid formation by Aβ(1-42) and I59T human lysozyme and shows that protease-activated α(2)M can act via two distinct mechanisms: (i) by trapping proteases that remain able to degrade polypeptide chains and (ii) by a chaperone action that prevents misfolded clients from continuing along the amyloid forming pathway.
Copyright © 2013 Federation of European Biochemical Societies. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23353684      PMCID: PMC3581772          DOI: 10.1016/j.febslet.2013.01.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  FEBS Lett        ISSN: 0014-5793            Impact factor:   4.124


Introduction

α2-Macroglobulin is a highly abundant glycoprotein present in blood plasma, cerebrospinal fluid and other extracellular fluids. α2M is best known for its ability to trap a broad range of proteases within a cage-like quaternary structure via covalent-linkage of the protease to intramolecular thioester bonds on α2M [1]. This reaction results in a conformationally altered form commonly known as “activated” or “fast” α2M, the latter term relating to enhanced mobility via native gel electrophoresis. Activation of α2M results in the exposure of a cryptic receptor recognition site for the low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein (LRP) [1]. In addition to proteases, small nucleophiles can activate α2M by interacting directly with its thioester bonds [2]. Along with protease trapping, many other biological functions have been proposed for α2M; including roles in immunomodulation, cancer progression and extracellular proteostasis [3-5]. α2M can bind to a range of endogenous disease-associated proteins including the amyloid β peptide (Aβ1–42) [6], prion proteins [7] and β2-microglobulin [8], which are the main components of deposits found in Alzheimer’s disease (AD), spongiform encephalopathies and dialysis-related amyloidosis, respectively [9]. Moreover, α2M is found to be co-localized in vivo with amyloid deposits in AD and the spongiform encephalopathies [7,10]. Recent work has shown that native α2M can act as an ATP-independent molecular chaperone by suppressing stress-induced amorphous protein aggregation [5]. The mechanism by which this occurs appears to involve the formation of stable, soluble complexes between α2M and the misfolded client proteins [5]. Native α2M has also been shown to suppress the fibril formation of a range of amyloidogenic proteins and peptides [11,12]. It has been proposed that α2M can protect against pathogenic misfolded proteins by promoting their removal from the extracellular space [6,13,14]. However, trypsin-activated α2M (trypsin-α2M) is reportedly unable to prevent the amorphous aggregation, in vitro, of some proteins [5]. Nevertheless, after binding to misfolded proteins, α2M retains the ability to become activated, and α2M-trypsin-misfolded protein complexes are recognized by LRP [5], representing a potential route for the targeted disposal of misfolded proteins in vivo. Activated α2M can protect cells from Aβ toxicity in vitro through specific binding and subsequent LRP mediated uptake and degradation of Aβ1−40 [6,10,15]. While it is clear that activated α2M can bind to Aβ peptide, its ability to prevent the fibrillar aggregation of amyloid forming peptides or proteins has not been tested. To address this issue, we investigate the effect of activated α2M on the fibril formation of the amyloidogenic Aβ1–42 peptide and of a non-natural variant of human lysozyme (I59T) that possesses many attributes associated with the natural amyloidogenic variants linked to systemic amyloidosis [16].

Materials and methods

Chemicals and reagents were purchased from Sigma–Aldrich Ltd. unless otherwise stated.

Proteins and peptides

α2M was purified from human plasma by zinc chelate affinity chromatography and size exclusion chromatography (SEC) as previously described [5]. Purified α2M was stored at 4 °C (for less than 2 months) and routinely examined prior to use by native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) to ensure that the preparation had not become partially degraded, activated or cross-linked, modifications that can occur with prolonged storage [4,17,18]. Aβ1–42 was purchased from Biopeptide Co. Inc. or Bachem AG. Solutions of Aβ1–42 peptide were prepared by a TFA/HFIP dissolution method [19]. The non-natural variant of human lysozyme, I59T, was expressed and purified as previously described [16].

Preparation of activated α2M

Trypsin-α2M was prepared by incubating α2M with a threefold molar excess of bovine trypsin in PBS (pH 7.4, 25 °C, 45 min). The degree of α2M activation was assessed by NuPAGE Novex 3–8% Tris–acetate gels with Tris–glycine native running buffer (Life Technologies Ltd.). The reaction was allowed to continue for up to an additional 45 min to ensure completion. Unreacted trypsin was removed by SEC and SDS–PAGE analysis using NuPAGE Novex 4–12% Bis–Tris gels with MES running buffer (Life Technologies Ltd.) confirmed that no cleavage outside the bait region had occurred. To produce enzymatically inactivated trypsin-α2M (i.e. (i)trypsin-α2M), trypsin-α2M was incubated (2 h, 25 °C) with excess Complete™ protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche Diagnostics Ltd.) and samples were desalted using Zeba™ desalting columns (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Ammonium chloride (NH4Cl) activation was performed by incubating α2M with 400 mM NH4Cl in PBS (14 h, 25 °C) and subsequently desalting as described.

Thioflavin-T assays

Aβ1–42 (5 μM, PBS (pH 7.4), 50 μM ThT) was incubated in a 384 well plate (37 °C, with shaking) using a FLUOstar OPTIMA fluorescence plate reader (BMG Labtech Ltd.) with excitation and emission wavelengths of 440 nm and 480 nm (slit-widths 10 nm). I59T lysozyme (6.8 μM, 0.1 M citrate buffer (pH 5.0), 25 μM ThT) was incubated with stirring at 60 °C in a Cary Eclipse spectrofluorimeter (Agilent Ltd.) and ThT fluorescence intensity was monitored with excitation and emission wavelengths of 440 nm and 480 nm (slit-widths 5 nm). All samples incubated with native α2M, trypsin-α2M, (i)trypsin-α2M, or NH4Cl-activated α2M contained a molar ratio of substrate-to-α2M of 10:1, based on the molecular weights of the α2M tetramer (720 kDa), the Aβ1–42 monomer (4.5 kDa) or the I59T monomer (14.7 kDa). All experiments were performed in triplicate.

SDS–PAGE analysis

At the endpoints of the aggregation assays, aliquots were removed and either centrifuged (10 min, 10 000×g) (I59T lysozyme and Aβ1–42) or filtered (0.22 μm filter) (I59T lysozyme). For I59T lysozyme, the pellet fractions were rinsed with dH2O, centrifuged again (10 min, 10 000×g) and then dissolved in 10 μl of 8 M urea solution. The supernatants and solubilised pellets were separated on 4–12% NuPAGE gels under reducing conditions. The gels were stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue or Sigma ProteoSilver stain kit for I59T and Aβ1–42, respectively. Additionally, Aβ1–42 labelled with Hilyte™ 488 (AnaSpec) was incubated with 10:1 substrate-to-trypsin-α2M (30 min, 25 °C) and centrifuged (10 min, 10 000×g). The supernatants were separated on 4–12% NuPAGE gels and visualized using a Typhoon Trio Imager (GE Healthcare Ltd).

Transmission electron microscopy (TEM)

Fibril solutions (5 μl) were applied to carbon-coated nickel grids, stained with 2% (w/v) uranyl acetate, and imaged on a FEI Tecnai G2 transmission electron microscope (Multi-Imaging Unit in the Department of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, UK). Images were analyzed using the SIS Megaview II Image Capture system (Olympus).

Results

Native α2M has previously been shown to inhibit the amorphous and fibrillar aggregation of a range of proteins by increasing their solubility [5,11,12,16]. To determine if activated α2M can also prevent amyloid formation, we compared the effect of native α2M and trypsin-α2M on the fibril formation of I59T lysozyme and the amyloidogenic peptide Aβ1–42. Previously reported conditions for generating trypsin-α2M vary greatly [2,5,20]; therefore, in this study we used an optimized method to obtain preparations of trypsin-α2M that were completely activated but not degraded (Supplementary Fig. 1). The aggregation behavior of I59T lysozyme is well established and this system has been used to study the effects on fibril formation of the extracellular chaperones clusterin, haptoglobin and native α2M [12,21]. In this study, the kinetics of aggregation show a lag phase of ca. 50 min, followed by a rapid growth phase that reaches a plateau after ca. 150 min (Fig. 1a, black line). α2M, present at a molar ratio of 10:1 (lysozyme-to-α2M), results in a dramatic decrease in thioflavin-T (ThT) fluorescence over the course of the assay (Fig. 1a; red line). When trypsin-α2M is incubated with I59T lysozyme the ThT fluorescence is again, significantly suppressed (Fig. 1a; blue line). At the endpoint of the fibril formation, the presence of both native α2M and trypsin-α2M results in over a 90% decrease in ThT signal relative to the I59T lysozyme sample alone (Fig. 1b).
Fig. 1

Effects of α2M variants on I59T lysozyme fibril formation. (a) In vitro fibril formation of I59T lysozyme incubated alone (black), with native α2M (red), with trypsin-α2M (blue) or with NH4Cl-activated α2M (green) using α2M-to-lysozyme molar ratios of 1:10. (b) Percent of maximum ThT signal at the endpoint of aggregation. Each bar represents an average of three individual experiments. (c) TEM analysis of the endpoint samples in the absence or presence of the different α2M variants, with scale bars representing 100 nm and numbers corresponding to the lanes in gel analysis. (d) SDS–PAGE of the endpoint supernatants shows no soluble protein in I59T lysozyme incubated alone (1), whereas soluble protein is present for samples containing native α2M (2), trypsin-α2M (3) and NH4Cl-activated α2M (4). Soluble I59T lysozyme is shown in lane S and lane M shows molecular mass markers. (e) SDS–PAGE of the solubilized endpoint pellets showing a significant quantity of protein present for I59T incubated alone (1p), and also trace quantities of protein present for samples containing native α2M (2p), trypsin-α2M (3p) and NH4Cl-activated α2M (4p).

TEM images of the ThT assay endpoint samples demonstrate that while I59T lysozyme alone forms fibrillar structures there is no evidence for such structures when I59T lysozyme is incubated under the same conditions with native α2M or trypsin-α2M (Fig. 1c). SDS–PAGE analysis of the endpoint supernatants reveals that no detectable I59T lysozyme remains in solution when incubated alone, whereas in the presence of native α2M, a large majority (>90%) of lysozyme remains soluble (Fig. 1d). The I59T lysozyme also remains in the soluble fraction when incubated with trypsin-α2M and shows no evidence of proteolytic degradation (Fig. 1d). Conversely, the pellet fractions (solubilized with 8 M urea), shows a large proportion of I59T lysozyme in the I59T alone sample (Fig. 1e, lane 1p) and only trace amounts (less than 10%) of lysozyme present in samples incubated with native α2M and trypsin-α2M (Fig. 1e, lane 2p and 3p). This finding is consistent with the fraction of the maximum ThT signal observed at the aggregation endpoints (Fig. 1b). In separate experiments, incubation of monomeric I59T lysozyme with trypsin or trypsin-α2M does not result in the appearance of any degraded protein in the soluble fractions after 120 min of incubation under the aggregation conditions used (Supplementary Fig. 2a), in addition, trypsin alone has no effect on I59T fibril formation (Supplementary Fig. 2b). However, it is noted that small quantities of protein fragments (less than 5% total protein) are apparent in the SDS–PAGE analysis of the pellet samples after 300 min incubation. These fragments may be the result of residual trypsin-α2M activity, but they appear to be aggregation prone as they are only apparent in small quantities in the insoluble pellet sample. Taken together these results reveal that, native α2M and trypsin-α2M are able to suppress I59T fibril formation predominantly via chaperone action. We next evaluated whether trypsin-α2M could also suppress Aβ1–42 fibril formation. Under the conditions used here, aggregation of Aβ1–42 shows a lag of ca. 70 min, followed by a rapid growth phase and a plateau at ca. 150 min (Fig. 2a, black line). Consistent with previous studies [12], the presence of native α2M at a 10:1 (Aβ1–42-to-α2M) molar ratio dramatically reduces the time-dependent increase in ThT fluorescence (Fig. 1a; red line). At the same molar ratio, the presence of trypsin-α2M also results in a suppression of ThT fluorescence (Fig. 2a, solid blue line). This suppression in ThT signal is over 80% for both the presence of native α2M and trypsin-α2M at the endpoint of the assay (Fig. 2b). In all samples containing Aβ1–42 there is a small ThT fluorescence signal at the start of the assay, likely to be due to some ThT positive aggregates being present in the stock peptide solutions. This level remains constant over the time course for the samples containing native α2M, but decreases slightly in the presence of trypsin-α2M. We suspect that this may be due to the ability of trypsin-α2M to degrade these ThT positive species.
Fig. 2

Effects of α2M variants on Aβ1–42 fibril formation. (a) In vitro fibril formation of Aβ1–42, incubated alone (black), with native α2M (red), with trypsin-α2M (blue), with (i)trypsin-α2M (blue circles) or with NH4Cl-activated α2M (green), using α2M-to-Aβ1–42 molar ratios of 1:10. (b) Percent of maximum ThT signal at the endpoint of aggregation. Each bar represents the average of three individual experiments. (c) TEM analysis of the endpoint samples in the absence or presence of the different α2M variants, with scale bars representing 100 nm and numbers corresponding to the lanes in gel analysis. (d) SDS–PAGE analysis of the endpoint supernatants shows no soluble protein for Aβ1–42 incubated alone (1), but soluble peptide present when incubated with native α2M (2). Incubation with trypsin-α2M (3) results in no full-length Aβ1–42 peptide, whereas the incubation with (i)trypsin-α2M (4) and NH4Cl-activated α2M (5) have full-length peptide present. Lane M shows molecular mass markers. (d) Fluorescence image of SDS–PAGE analysis of HiLyte-488 labelled Aβ1–42, alone (lane 1) and after incubation with trypsin-α2M (lane 2) or (i)trypsin-α2M (lane 3). The presence of trypsin-α2M results in an increase in Aβ1–42 fragments (red arrow).

TEM images of the ThT assay endpoint samples show that fibrillar aggregates are formed by Aβ1–42 incubated alone; however, in the presence of either native α2M or trypsin-α2M, the number of well-defined fibrils is reduced and most aggregates appear to be amorphous (Fig. 2c). Analysis of the endpoint supernatants by SDS–PAGE reveals that incubation of Aβ1–42 with trypsin-α2M results in proteolysis of the peptide (Fig. 2d, lane 3). This result is consistent with previous work showing that α2M-trapped proteases remain active against small substrates including Aβ1–42 [22]. Therefore, it appears that trypsin-α2M prevents Aβ1–42 fibril formation, under these conditions at least partly via degradation of the Aβ1–42 peptide to form smaller species that remain soluble. Interestingly, this mechanism for inhibiting fibril formation may not be restricted to just Aβ1–42. We have also observed that trypsin-α2M can suppress the fibril formation of reduced and carboxymethylated α-lactalbumin by a process which involves proteolysis of the full-length protein (Supplementary Fig. 3). Given that trypsin-α2M can degrade polypeptides which can enter the activated α2M cage, it is necessary to inactivate the bound trypsin to examine, in isolation, whether trypsin-α2M possesses chaperone activity similar to native α2M. Trypsin-α2M and trypsin-α2M after treatment with a small molecule protease inhibitor ((i)trypsin-α2M) migrate similarly when analyzed by native PAGE, suggesting that protease inactivation does not grossly affect the structure of the covalent complex (Supplementary Fig. 1). Incubation of fluorophore-labelled Aβ1–42 with trypsin-α2M shows that pre-treatment of the latter with protease inhibitors prevents detectable proteolysis of Aβ1–42 (Fig. 2e), however, the (i)trypsin-α2M retains the ability to inhibit Aβ1–42 aggregation (Fig. 2a, blue circles). Significantly, analysis of the endpoint supernatants reveals that soluble, full-length Aβ1–42 is present in the (i)trypsin-α2M sample and no degradation fragments are observed (Fig. 2d, lane 4). Analysis by TEM confirms that no fibrils are present in the Aβ1–42 sample containing (i)trypsin-α2M (Fig. 2c). To confirm that chaperone activity of activated α2M is not reliant on the presence of the bound protease, we tested the ability of NH4Cl activated-α2M to suppress fibril formation. Data from aggregation assays show that NH4Cl-activated α2M effectively suppresses the ThT fluorescence associated with fibril formation by Aβ1–42 peptide or I59T lysozyme (Fig. 1a and Fig. 2a, green lines). TEM images of the endpoint samples show that only traces of fibrillar species are present in either the Aβ1–42 or the I59T sample containing NH4Cl-activated α2M. Furthermore, SDS–PAGE analysis of the endpoint supernatants demonstrates that the presence of NH4Cl-activated α2M increases the proportion of both client proteins remaining in their soluble, full-length forms at the endpoint of the assays (Fig. 1d, lane 4 and Fig. 2d lane 5). These results confirm that activated α2M can influence the solubility of polypeptides regardless of whether or not it is complexed to a protease molecule.

Discussion

In the work presented here, we show that activated α2M, despite a large conformational change upon activation, retains the ability to suppress fibril formation. From earlier work, it is clear that α2M has distinct binding sites for proteases and misfolded proteins as the binding of a misfolded client protein does not prevent protease trapping [6]. In the current study, we demonstrate that the presence of a bound protease, regardless of whether or not the protease is pharmacologically inhibited, does not significantly reduce chaperone activity of α2M. Moreover, α2M remains an active chaperone after direct activation using small molecules. In vivo, activated α2M is rapidly cleared from circulation [2] and typically represents only 0.17–0.7% of the total α2M in blood plasma of adults [23]. The activated α2M plasma concentration is, however, increased in many disease states including pancreatitis, multiple sclerosis and sepsis [23-25]. Moreover, the onset of some diseases, such as periodontitis, diabetic retinopathy and inflammatory joint disease results in increased activated α2M levels in other extracellular fluids [26-28]. Although enhanced concentrations of activated α2M have been largely attributed to increased protease trapping, it has been reported that interaction with proteases only partially accounts for the total activated α2M present in synovial fluid [28]; higher levels of both protease-activated and amine-activated α2M may therefore be significant for facilitating clearance of aberrant clients via LRP. Interestingly, aggregates of Aβ1–40 and amylin have been shown to activate the plasmin protease system [29]. Thus it is possible that concentrations of plasmin-activated α2M may also be increased in response to the accumulation of misfolded proteins. In conclusion, we provide evidence that protease-activated α2M has two distinct mechanisms for inhibiting amyloid formation: (i) via protease–α2M-mediated degradation of amyloidogenic substrates and (ii) by a chaperone action that prevents misfolded clients from continuing along the amyloid forming pathway. In the absence of proteases, activated α2M is able to inhibit fibril formation via the latter function only. It is tempting to speculate that the chaperone activity of protease-activated α2M may target misfolded proteins to the trapped protease, thereby providing a specific mechanism for degradation of amyloidogenic proteins in extracellular fluids. Clearly, further studies are required to substantiate this proposition; however, a greater understanding of the mechanisms by which α2M is able to prevent protein aggregation and facilitate the disposal of misfolded peptide and protein molecules could, in future, provide potential therapeutic targets for amyloidosis.
  28 in total

1.  A non-natural variant of human lysozyme (I59T) mimics the in vitro behaviour of the I56T variant that is responsible for a form of familial amyloidosis.

Authors:  Christine L Hagan; Russell J K Johnson; Anne Dhulesia; Mireille Dumoulin; Janice Dumont; Erwin De Genst; John Christodoulou; Carol V Robinson; Christopher M Dobson; Janet R Kumita
Journal:  Protein Eng Des Sel       Date:  2010-04-09       Impact factor: 1.650

Review 2.  Potential roles of abundant extracellular chaperones in the control of amyloid formation and toxicity.

Authors:  Mark R Wilson; Justin J Yerbury; Stephen Poon
Journal:  Mol Biosyst       Date:  2007-11-19

3.  Tissue-type plasminogen activator is a multiligand cross-beta structure receptor.

Authors:  Onno Kranenburg; Barend Bouma; Loes M J Kroon-Batenburg; Arie Reijerkerk; Ya-Ping Wu; Emile E Voest; Martijn F B G Gebbink
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2002-10-29       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  Role of alpha2-macroglobulin in regulating amyloid beta-protein neurotoxicity: protective or detrimental factor?

Authors:  C Fabrizi; R Businaro; G M Lauro; L Fumagalli
Journal:  J Neurochem       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 5.372

5.  A protective role of the low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein against amyloid beta-protein toxicity.

Authors:  E Van Uden; Y Sagara; J Van Uden; R Orlando; M Mallory; E Rockenstein; E Masliah
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2000-09-29       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  alpha2-Macroglobulin and haptoglobin suppress amyloid formation by interacting with prefibrillar protein species.

Authors:  Justin J Yerbury; Janet R Kumita; Sarah Meehan; Christopher M Dobson; Mark R Wilson
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2008-12-11       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Effect of retinal laser photocoagulation on the activity of metalloproteinases and the alpha(2)-macroglobulin proteolytic state in the vitreous of eyes with proliferative diabetic retinopathy.

Authors:  María C Sánchez; Jose D Luna; Pablo F Barcelona; Ana L Gramajo; Patricio C Juarez; Clelia M Riera; Gustavo A Chiabrando
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2007-08-06       Impact factor: 3.467

8.  Alpha 2-macroglobulin-mediated degradation of amyloid beta 1--42: a mechanism to enhance amyloid beta catabolism.

Authors:  D Lauer; A Reichenbach; G Birkenmeier
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 5.330

9.  Circulating level of alpha2-macroglobulin-beta2-microglobulin complex in hemodialysis patients.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Motomiya; Yukio Ando; Katsuki Haraoka; Xuguo Sun; Hisahiko Iwamoto; Tomonori Uchimura; Ikuro Maruyama
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 10.612

10.  Protease activation of alpha2-macroglobulin modulates a chaperone-like action with broad specificity.

Authors:  Katie French; Justin J Yerbury; Mark R Wilson
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2008-01-03       Impact factor: 3.162

View more
  15 in total

1.  Association of cerebrospinal fluid Aβ42 with A2M gene in cognitively normal subjects.

Authors:  Steven P Millard; Franziska Lutz; Ge Li; Douglas R Galasko; Martin R Farlow; Joseph F Quinn; Jeffrey A Kaye; James B Leverenz; Debby Tsuang; Chang-En Yu; Elaine R Peskind; Lynn M Bekris
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 4.673

Review 2.  Cellular Trafficking of Amyloid Precursor Protein in Amyloidogenesis Physiological and Pathological Significance.

Authors:  Noralyn Basco Mañucat-Tan; Khalil Saadipour; Yan-Jiang Wang; Larisa Bobrovskaya; Xin-Fu Zhou
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 5.590

3.  Cerebrospinal Fluid Proteins as Regulators of Beta-amyloid Aggregation and Toxicity.

Authors:  Kayla M Pate; Regina M Murphy
Journal:  Isr J Chem       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 3.333

4.  α2-macroglobulin in Alzheimer's disease: new roles for an old chaperone.

Authors:  Sahba Seddighi; Vijay Varma; Madhav Thambisetty
Journal:  Biomark Med       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 2.851

5.  Hypochlorite-induced structural modifications enhance the chaperone activity of human α2-macroglobulin.

Authors:  Amy R Wyatt; Janet R Kumita; Richard W Mifsud; Cherrie A Gooden; Mark R Wilson; Christopher M Dobson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Inactivation of Alpha-2-Macroglobulin by Photo-Illuminated Gallic Acid.

Authors:  Tooba Siddiqui; Mohammad Khalid Zia; Syed Saqib Ali; Haseeb Ahsan; Fahim Halim Khan
Journal:  J Fluoresc       Date:  2019-07-20       Impact factor: 2.217

7.  Cryo-EM structures reveal the dynamic transformation of human alpha-2-macroglobulin working as a protease inhibitor.

Authors:  Xiaoxing Huang; Youwang Wang; Cong Yu; Hui Zhang; Qiang Ru; Xinxin Li; Kai Song; Min Zhou; Ping Zhu
Journal:  Sci China Life Sci       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 6.038

Review 8.  Clusterin, other extracellular chaperones, and eye disease.

Authors:  Mark R Wilson; Sandeep Satapathy; Shinwu Jeong; M Elizabeth Fini
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 19.704

9.  Alpha-2-Macroglobulin Is Acutely Sensitive to Freezing and Lyophilization: Implications for Structural and Functional Studies.

Authors:  Amy R Wyatt; Janet R Kumita; Natalie E Farrawell; Christopher M Dobson; Mark R Wilson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Molecular chaperones and proteostasis regulation during redox imbalance.

Authors:  Katerina Niforou; Christina Cheimonidou; Ioannis P Trougakos
Journal:  Redox Biol       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 11.799

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.