| Literature DB >> 23352214 |
Abdolreza Ghamarian1, Mohammad Abdollahi, Xiaogang Su, Azita Amiri, Ali Ahadi, Azin Nowrouzi.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: The goal was to evaluate and compare the effects of aqueous extract of the seeds of chicory, Cichorium intybus L., on glucose tolerance test (GTT) and blood biochemical indices of experimentally-induced hyperglycemic rats.Entities:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23352214 PMCID: PMC3556018 DOI: 10.1186/2008-2231-20-56
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Daru ISSN: 1560-8115 Impact factor: 3.117
A summary of the method: group divisions of rats, initial conditions and injections
| Control (10) | 110.64 ± 5.62 | 200.36 ± 17.86 | 86.5 ± 7.17 | - |
| Chicory-control (10) | 104.14 ± 10.99 | 219.28 ± 15.42 | 87.64 ± 9.41 | + |
| NIA/STZ (9) | 111.35 ± 7.56 | 228.00 ± 13.94 | 137.78 ± 15.62 | - |
| Chicory-NIA/STZ (10) | 111.28 ± 6.82 | 231.71 ± 14.87 | 137.00 ± 29.39 | + |
| STZ (7) | 107.93 ± 11.29 | 213.71 ± 21.24 | 308.50 ± 117.7 | - |
| Chicory-STZ (10) | 110.92 ± 2.59 | 230.28 ± 16.24 | 330.14 ± 109.54 | + |
BS, blood sugar; FBS, fasting blood sugar; STZ, Streptozotocin, 65 mg/kg body weight; NIA, Niacinamide, 200 mg/kg body weight,15 min later; IP, intraperitoneal;. a refers to the number of animals on day 28 after treatment.
Summary statistics of blood variables values after 28 days of i.p. chicory extract injection
| Weight | 227.3 ± 15.2 | 247.6 ± 28.8 | 218.1 ± 21.2 | 242.6 ± 14.1 | 186.8 ± 13.7 | 229.9 ± 25.7 |
| *AST | 119.1 ± 20.1 | 128.6 ± 20.1 | 124.6 ± 28.6 | 126.0 ± 47.6 | 151.7 ± 64.9 | 103.7 ± 20.4 |
| *ALTa†,b†,c‡,f† | 43.7 ± 9.9 | 47.4 ± 11.9 | 46.2 ± 7.5 | 40.6 ± 9.0 | 87.8 ± 43.0 | 51.2 ± 15.7 |
| TGa‡,b† | 78.5 ± 31.7 | 83.3 ± 27.1 | 111.2 ± 38.1 | 82.8 ± 44.7 | 121.6 ± 26.9 | 97.3 ± 33.5 |
| TCa†,b†d# | 40.6 ± 9.9 | 43.0 ± 6.9 | 48.3 ± 7.7 | 51.3 ± 11.0 | 56.2 ± 9.6 | 49.6 ± 7.9 |
| Total protein | 6.10 ± 0.5 | 5.9 ± 0.2 | 6.0 ± 0.2 | 6.4 ± 0.6 | 5.8 ± 0.5 | 5.7 ± 0.5 |
| HbA1caŦ,bŦ, d†,e†,fŦ | 3.9 ± 0.2 | 3.9 ± 0.2 | 4.0 ± 0.4 | 4.0 ± 0.1 | 8.0 ± 2.3 | 6.5 ± 1.9 |
| NOa‡, b#,c‡ | 37.0 ± 4.6 | 37.0 ± 5.0 | 34.46.0 | 36.8 ± 4.0 | 31.2 ± 5.1 | 38.3 ± 6.4 |
| FBS | 77.7 ± 6.6 | 77.1 ± 3.0 | 159.2 ± 7.6 | 110.4 ± 8.5 | 416.5 ± 33.0 | 361 ± 86.1 |
| Insulin | 2.5 ± 0.4 | 2.5 ± 0.8 | 0.08 ± 0.3 | 0.8 ± 0.3 | NA | NA |
Weight (gram), AST and ALT, specific activities of aspartate amino transferase and alanine amino transferase, (Units per grams protein); TG, triacylglycerol (mg/dl); TC, total cholesterol (mg/dl); Total protein (g/dl); HbA1c, glycosylated hemoglobin (%); and NO, nitric oxide (μmol/dl), FBS, fasting blood sugar (mg/dl); Insulin (μg/l). Data are presented as mean ± SD. NA Insulin concentrations were considered undetectable, as the values were negative −0.76 ± 0.3 and −0.66 ± 0.4 for CS and TCS, respectively. i.p, intraperitoneal;* AST and ALT were adjusted by a division of Total protein values. acontrol vs. STZ; bchicory-control vs. STZ; cSTZ vs. chicory-STZ; dcontrol vs. chicory-STZ; echicory-control vs. chicory-STZ, fSTZ vs. NIA/STZ; †p < 0.01; ‡p < 0.05; Ŧp < 0.001; #p ≤ 0.05.
Figure 1Mean weight by day for each group.
Figure 2Mean FBS by day for each group.
Figure 3IPGTT. Mean plots for blood glucose (A) and insulin (B) by time. (A) Blood glucose follow-up for 120 minutes. Blood sugar levels in NIA/STZ were statistically and significantly higher than control at all points in time during GTT (p < 0.0001). Chicory lowered blood sugar values closer to control. (Control vs. chicory-NIA/STZ: initial, p <0.0001; 30 min, p > 0.05; 60 min, p = 0.01; 90 min, p = 0.05; 120 min, p < 0.001. NIA/STZ vs. chicory-NIA/STZ: initial, p < 0.001; 30 min, p < 0.01; 60 min, p < 0.001; 90 min, p < 0.01; 120 min, p < 0.0001). (B) Blood insulin follow-up for 120 min. The timing of maximum insulin was 30 min, 60 min and 90 min for control, chicory-NIA/STZ, and NIA/STZ, respectively.
Area under curve (AUC) for glucose and insulin in Figure3
| Glucose | 156524 ± 4099 | 178229 ± 6595 | 172765 ± 3354 | 195472 ± 2408 | 190161 ± 3828 |
| Insulin | 128189 ±10450 | 143380 ± 7985 | 123864 ± 7024 | NA | NA |
AUC for glucose in control was significantly different than AUC for NIA/STZ (P<0.001). AUCs for insulin were not significantly different among the three groups, p > 0.05). NA, non applicable.