Literature DB >> 2335171

Gender differences in anaerobic power tests.

J L Mayhew1, P C Salm.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine if the differences in anaerobic power between males and females could be accounted for by differences in body composition, strength, and neuromuscular function. A total of 82 untrained men and 99 women took part in the study. Body composition, somatotype, isometric strength, neuromuscular function were measured, and four anaerobic power tests performed. The men were significantly different from the women on all strength, power, and neuromuscular measurements except reaction time and on all anthropometric and somatotype dimensions except ectomorphy. Strength and anthropometric dimensions were similarly related to anaerobic power values within each sex. Relative fat (%fat) exerted different degrees of influence on sprint and jump performances in each sex. Removing the influence of anthropometric, strength, and neuromuscular differences by analysis of covariance reduced, but did not remove, the significant differences between the sexes. Therefore, factors other than lean body mass, leg strength, and neuromuscular function may be operating in short-term, explosive power performances to account for the differences between the sexes. The task-specific nature of anaerobic power tests and the relatively large influence of anthropometric factors on power production were confirmed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2335171     DOI: 10.1007/bf00846033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol        ISSN: 0301-5548


  18 in total

1.  Estimation of body fat in young women.

Authors:  A W SLOGAN; J J BURT; C S BLYTH
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1962-11       Impact factor: 3.531

2.  A modified somatotype method.

Authors:  B H Heath; J E Carter
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  1967-07       Impact factor: 2.868

3.  Alterations in strength, body composition and anthropometric measurements consequent to a 10-week weight training program.

Authors:  J H Wilmore
Journal:  Med Sci Sports       Date:  1974

4.  A factorial investigation of power, speed, isometric strength, and anthropometric measures in the lower limb.

Authors:  K B Start; R K Gray; D J Glencross; A Walsh
Journal:  Res Q       Date:  1966-12

5.  Gender difference in the relationship of performance in the handgrip and standing long jump tests to lean limb volume in young adults.

Authors:  B N Davies; E J Greenwood; S R Jones
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1988

6.  Effect of running velocity on external mechanical power output.

Authors:  T Fukunaga; A Matsuo
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 2.778

7.  Generalized equations for predicting body density of women.

Authors:  A S Jackson; M L Pollock; A Ward
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 5.411

8.  Gender comparisons in anaerobic power and anaerobic capacity tests.

Authors:  P J Maud; B B Shultz
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 13.800

9.  Muscle hypertrophy in men and women.

Authors:  K J Cureton; M A Collins; D W Hill; F M McElhannon
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 5.411

10.  Sex difference in muscular strength in equally-trained men and women.

Authors:  P Bishop; K Cureton; M Collins
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 2.778

View more
  17 in total

1.  Relationship between side medicine-ball throw performance and physical ability for male and female athletes.

Authors:  Yusuke Ikeda; Kota Kijima; Koichi Kawabata; Takafumi Fuchimoto; Akira Ito
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2006-10-18       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 2.  Trends in Triathlon Performance: Effects of Sex and Age.

Authors:  Romuald Lepers; Beat Knechtle; Paul J Stapley
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 3.  Unique aspects of competitive weightlifting: performance, training and physiology.

Authors:  Adam Storey; Heather K Smith
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Anthropometric comparison of world-class sprinters and normal populations.

Authors:  Niels Uth
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 2.988

5.  Gender Differences and the Influence of Body Composition on Land and Pool-Based Assessments of Anaerobic Power and Capacity.

Authors:  Jacquelyn N Zera; Elizabeth F Nagle; Emma Connell; Erin Curtin; Wilmina Marget; Anna P Simonson; Takashi Nagai; John Abt; Scott Lephart
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 4.614

6.  Sex difference in force generation capacity during repeated maximal knee extensions.

Authors:  H Kanehisa; H Okuyama; S Ikegawa; T Fukunaga
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1996

7.  Force generation capacity of knee extensor muscles in speed skaters.

Authors:  H Kanehisa; I Nemoto; H Okuyama; S Ikegawa; T Fukunaga
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1996

Review 8.  Muscle fatigue in males and females during multiple-sprint exercise.

Authors:  François Billaut; David Bishop
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 11.136

9.  Correlation between the Q angle and the isokinetic knee strength and muscle activity.

Authors:  Ajlan Saç; Mehmet Yalçın Taşmektepligil
Journal:  Turk J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2018-08-13

10.  A sex difference in the predisposition for physical competition: males play sports much more than females even in the contemporary U.S.

Authors:  Robert O Deaner; David C Geary; David A Puts; Sandra A Ham; Judy Kruger; Elizabeth Fles; Bo Winegard; Terry Grandis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.