Literature DB >> 24501574

Anthropometric comparison of world-class sprinters and normal populations.

Niels Uth1.   

Abstract

The present study compared the anthropometry of sprinters and people belonging to the normal population. The height and body mass (BM) distribution of sprinters (42 men and 44 women) were statistically compared to the distributions of American and Danish normal populations. The main results showed that there was significantly less BM and height variability (measured as standard deviation) among male sprinters than among the normal male population (US and Danish), while female sprinters showed less BM variability than the US and Danish normal female populations. On average the American normal population was shorter than the sprinters. There was no height difference between the sprinters and the Danish normal population. All female groups had similar height variability. Both male and female sprinters had lower body mass index (BMI) than the normal populations. It is likely that there is no single optimal height for sprinters, but instead there is an optimum range that differs for males and females. This range in height appears to exclude people who are very tall or very short in stature. Sprinters are generally lighter in BM than normal populations. Also, the BM variation among sprinters is less than the variation among normal populations. These anthropometric characteristics typical of sprinters might be explained, in part, by the influence the anthropometric characteristics have on relative muscle strength and step length. Key PointsThe male sprinters were less variable in height, body mass and body mass index than the normal populationsThe sprinters were lighter than the normal populations.The sprinters were taller than the American normal population.The female sprinters were less variable in body mass and body mass index than the normal population.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Sprint running; anthropometry; body mass; height

Year:  2005        PMID: 24501574      PMCID: PMC3899678     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci Med        ISSN: 1303-2968            Impact factor:   2.988


  22 in total

1.  Relationship between sprint performance and muscle fascicle length in female sprinters.

Authors:  T Abe; S Fukashiro; Y Harada; K Kawamoto
Journal:  J Physiol Anthropol Appl Human Sci       Date:  2001-03

Review 2.  Overview of the determinants of overweight and obesity: current evidence and research issues.

Authors:  J O Hill; E L Melanson
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 5.411

Review 3.  Biomechanics of sprint running. A review.

Authors:  A Mero; P V Komi; R J Gregor
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Differences in H-reflex between athletes trained for explosive contractions and non-trained subjects.

Authors:  A Casabona; M C Polizzi; V Perciavalle
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1990

5.  Sprint training effects on muscle myoglobin, enzymes, fiber types, and blood lactate.

Authors:  I Jacobs; M Esbjörnsson; C Sylvén; I Holm; E Jansson
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 5.411

6.  Gender- and height-related limits of muscle strength in world weightlifting champions.

Authors:  L E Ford; A J Detterline; K K Ho; W Cao
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2000-09

7.  Muscle hypertrophy in men and women.

Authors:  K J Cureton; M A Collins; D W Hill; F M McElhannon
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 5.411

8.  Gender differences in strength and muscle fiber characteristics.

Authors:  A E Miller; J D MacDougall; M A Tarnopolsky; D G Sale
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1993

9.  Endogenous anabolic hormonal and growth factor responses to heavy resistance exercise in males and females.

Authors:  W J Kraemer; S E Gordon; S J Fleck; L J Marchitelli; R Mello; J E Dziados; K Friedl; E Harman; C Maresh; A C Fry
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 3.118

10.  Predictability of skeletal muscle tension from architectural determinations in guinea pig hindlimbs.

Authors:  P L Powell; R R Roy; P Kanim; M A Bello; V R Edgerton
Journal:  J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol       Date:  1984-12
View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Sprint Start Regulation in Athletics: A Critical Review.

Authors:  Matthieu Milloz; Kevin Hayes; Andrew J Harrison
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  On the implications of a sex difference in the reaction times of sprinters at the Beijing Olympics.

Authors:  David B Lipps; Andrzej T Galecki; James A Ashton-Miller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Selected determinants of acceleration in the 100m sprint.

Authors:  Krzysztof Maćkała; Marek Fostiak; Kacper Kowalski
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 2.193

4.  On the apparent decrease in Olympic sprinter reaction times.

Authors:  Payam Mirshams Shahshahani; David B Lipps; Andrzej T Galecki; James A Ashton-Miller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  The Training and Development of Elite Sprint Performance: an Integration of Scientific and Best Practice Literature.

Authors:  Thomas Haugen; Stephen Seiler; Øyvind Sandbakk; Espen Tønnessen
Journal:  Sports Med Open       Date:  2019-11-21
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.