Literature DB >> 3730753

Gender comparisons in anaerobic power and anaerobic capacity tests.

P J Maud, B B Shultz.   

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to compare anaerobic power and anaerobic capacity test scores between young active men and women. Three performance measures of anaerobic power and two of anaerobic capacity were administered to a sample comprising 52 male and 50 female college students (means age = 21.4 yrs). Results indicated significant differences between men and women in body height, weight and per cent fat, in fat free mass (FFM), anaerobic power, and anaerobic capacity when recorded as gross work completed and relative to body weight. However, these differences are reduced when data is adjusted for body weight and further reduced when corrected for FFM. The study found no significant differences between men and women in either anaerobic power or anaerobic capacity when values were given relative to FFM.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3730753      PMCID: PMC1478312          DOI: 10.1136/bjsm.20.2.51

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Sports Med        ISSN: 0306-3674            Impact factor:   13.800


  11 in total

1.  Optimal test characteristics for maximal anaerobic work on the bicycle ergometer.

Authors:  V Katch; A Weltman; R Martin; L Gray
Journal:  Res Q       Date:  1977-05

2.  Alterations in strength, body composition and anthropometric measurements consequent to a 10-week weight training program.

Authors:  J H Wilmore
Journal:  Med Sci Sports       Date:  1974

Review 3.  Women and exercise: physiological aspects.

Authors:  B L Drinkwater
Journal:  Exerc Sport Sci Rev       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 6.230

4.  Physiological response of girls to aerobic and anaerobic endurance tests.

Authors:  P De Bruyn-Prevost; X Sturbois
Journal:  J Sports Med Phys Fitness       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 1.637

Review 5.  Steps toward the development of generalized equations for predicting body composition of adults.

Authors:  A S Jackson; M L Pollock
Journal:  Can J Appl Sport Sci       Date:  1982-09

6.  Generalized equations for predicting body density of men.

Authors:  A S Jackson; M L Pollock
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 3.718

7.  Generalized equations for predicting body density of women.

Authors:  A S Jackson; M L Pollock; A Ward
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 5.411

8.  Interrelationship between anaerobic power output, anaerobic capacity and aerobic power.

Authors:  V L Katch; A Weltman
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 2.778

9.  Comparison of circulatory responses to submaximal exercise in equally trained men and women.

Authors:  L D Zwiren; K J Cureton; P Hutchinson
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 3.118

10.  A meta-analysis of studies comparing maximal oxygen uptake in men and women.

Authors:  P B Sparling
Journal:  Res Q Exerc Sport       Date:  1980-10       Impact factor: 2.500

View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  The measurement of maximal (anaerobic) power output on a cycle ergometer: a critical review.

Authors:  Tarak Driss; Henry Vandewalle
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 2.  Strength and power assessment. Issues, controversies and challenges.

Authors:  P Abernethy; G Wilson; P Logan
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Gender differences in power production, energetic capacity and efficiency of elite cross‑country skiers during whole‑body, upper‑body, and arm poling.

Authors:  Ann Magdalen Hegge; Elias Bucher; Gertjan Ettema; Oliver Faude; Hans-Christer Holmberg; Øyvind Sandbakk
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 4.  Standard anaerobic exercise tests.

Authors:  H Vandewalle; G Pérès; H Monod
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1987 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 5.  Physiological employment standards IV: integration of women in combat units physiological and medical considerations.

Authors:  Yoram Epstein; Ran Yanovich; Daniel S Moran; Yuval Heled
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  Sex difference in force generation capacity during repeated maximal knee extensions.

Authors:  H Kanehisa; H Okuyama; S Ikegawa; T Fukunaga
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1996

7.  Gender differences in anaerobic power tests.

Authors:  J L Mayhew; P C Salm
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1990

Review 8.  Muscle fatigue in males and females during multiple-sprint exercise.

Authors:  François Billaut; David Bishop
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 11.136

9.  LBNP exercise protects aerobic capacity and sprint speed of female twins during 30 days of bed rest.

Authors:  Stuart M C Lee; Suzanne M Schneider; Wanda L Boda; Donald E Watenpaugh; Brandon R Macias; R Scott Meyer; Alan R Hargens
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2008-12-26

Review 10.  Maximal muscular power: lessons from sprint cycling.

Authors:  Jamie Douglas; Angus Ross; James C Martin
Journal:  Sports Med Open       Date:  2021-07-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.