Literature DB >> 23344655

Women's perceptions of their involvement in treatment decision making for early stage breast cancer.

Mary Ann O'Brien1, Cathy Charles, Timothy J Whelan, Peter M Ellis, Amiram Gafni, Peter Lovrics.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study aimed to describe the perceptions of women with early stage breast cancer regarding their involvement in treatment decision making (TDM).
METHODS: Eligible women with early stage breast cancer were recruited immediately after their first consultation with a specialist. Semistructured personal interviews were held prior to treatment. Interviews were audiotaped, transcribed, and analyzed.
RESULTS: Nineteen women with early stage breast cancer considering surgery (n = 6) or adjuvant therapy (n = 13) participated. Women described being involved in various stages of TDM and interacting with informal networks and specialists. Women's descriptions suggest that (1) the concept of involvement in TDM may have a broader meaning for patients than strictly their decisional role and (2) inclusion of significant others in TDM contributes to the patient's sense of involvement.
CONCLUSIONS: Conceptualization and measurement of patient involvement in TDM have often been framed within the context of the medical encounter and the patient's perceived or actual role in this process. Our findings raise questions about what involvement means to patients with early stage breast cancer and suggest that the focus on patient involvement in TDM within the medical encounter may be too narrow to capture the meaning of involvement from the patient's perspective.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23344655     DOI: 10.1007/s00520-013-1718-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  37 in total

1.  Informed consent and risk communication in France.

Authors:  Nora Moumjid; Marie-France Callu
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-09-27

2.  Treatment decision aids: conceptual issues and future directions.

Authors:  Cathy Charles; Amiram Gafni; Tim Whelan; Mary Ann O'Brien
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 3.  Patient involvement in treatment decision-making: the case for a broader conceptual framework.

Authors:  Vikki A Entwistle; Ian S Watt
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2006-07-27

4.  Supreme Court reaffirms landmark informed-consent ruling in chickenpox case.

Authors:  K Capen
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1997-09-01       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 5.  Patient decision aids for cancer treatment: are there any alternatives?

Authors:  Gillian Spiegle; Eisar Al-Sukhni; Selina Schmocker; Anna R Gagliardi; J Charles Victor; Nancy N Baxter; Erin D Kennedy
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Physician-related facilitators and barriers to patient involvement in treatment decision making in early stage breast cancer: perspectives of physicians and patients.

Authors:  Mary Ann O'Brien; Peter M Ellis; Timothy J Whelan; Cathy Charles; Amiram Gafni; Peter Lovrics; Som D Mukherjee; Nicole Hodgson
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 7.  Patients' preference for involvement in medical decision making: a narrative review.

Authors:  Rebecca Say; Madeleine Murtagh; Richard Thomson
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2006-02

8.  Women's preferences for and views on decision-making for diagnostic tests.

Authors:  Heather M Davey; Jacqueline Lim; Phyllis N Butow; Alexandra L Barratt; Sally Redman
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 9.  Are cancer-related decision aids effective? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mary Ann O'Brien; Timothy J Whelan; Miguel Villasis-Keever; Amiram Gafni; Cathy Charles; Robin Roberts; Susan Schiff; Wenjie Cai
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-01-05       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Relationship between preferences for decisional control and illness information among women with breast cancer: a quantitative and qualitative analysis.

Authors:  T F Hack; L F Degner; D G Dyck
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 4.634

View more
  4 in total

1.  Evaluating a Decision Aid for Improving Decision Making in Patients with Early-stage Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Sarah T Hawley; Lisa Newman; Jennifer J Griggs; Mary Ann Kosir; Steven J Katz
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  What Is Important When Making Treatment Decisions in Metastatic Breast Cancer? A Qualitative Analysis of Decision-Making in Patients and Oncologists.

Authors:  Gabrielle B Rocque; Aysha Rasool; Beverly R Williams; Audrey S Wallace; Soumya J Niranjan; Karina I Halilova; Yasemin E Turkman; Stacey A Ingram; Courtney P Williams; Andres Forero-Torres; Tom Smith; Smita Bhatia; Sara J Knight
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2019-03-14

3.  A Decision Aid for Women Considering Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy for Operable Invasive Breast Cancer: Development and Protocol of a Phase II Evaluation Study (ANZ1301 DOMINO).

Authors:  Nicholas Zdenkowski; Phyllis Butow; Elizabeth Hutchings; Charles Douglas; Joseph R Coll; Frances M Boyle
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2016-05-20

Review 4.  Empowering patients in decision-making in radiation oncology - can we do better?

Authors:  Michelle Leech; Matthew S Katz; Joanna Kazmierska; Julie McCrossin; Sandra Turner
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2020-04-13       Impact factor: 6.603

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.