Literature DB >> 23341674

Association of primary care physician sex with cervical cancer and mammography screening.

Daniel Ince-Cushman1, José A Correa, Jennifer Shuldiner, Judith Segouin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether the sex of primary care physicians is associated with differing rates of cervical cancer and mammography screening in a contemporary multicultural context.
DESIGN: Structured medical record review of a retrospectively defined cohort.
SETTING: Academic urban primary care clinic in Montreal, Que. PARTICIPANTS: Seven male physicians and 9 female physicians, and all female patients aged 14 to 69 years registered to one of the physicians (N = 1948). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Screening compliance rates as measured by the elapsed time between the last visit and cervical cancer screening for all women in the study. In addition, in women aged 50 to 69 years, elapsed time between the last visit and mammography screening.
RESULTS: Crude rates of Papanicolaou tests for patients of female primary care physicians were higher than for patients of male primary care physicians in all patient age groups. The lowest rates of Pap testing were among the youngest and oldest patients. After adjustment for patient age, first language, and region of birth, as well as physician age, the odds ratio of having a Pap test was 2.24 (95% CI 1.18 to 4.28) for the patients of female physicians, relative to those of male physicians. The adjusted odds ratio for mammography screening was 1.25 (95% CI 0.97 to 1.61) for patients of female physicians.
CONCLUSION: Male primary care physician sex is associated with lower rates of cervical cancer screening in an urban multicultural context. The study did not detect a physician sex effect in the mammography cohort.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23341674      PMCID: PMC3555673     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Fam Physician        ISSN: 0008-350X            Impact factor:   3.275


  20 in total

1.  The effect of physician characteristics on compliance with adult preventive care guidelines.

Authors:  J W Ely; C J Goerdt; G R Bergus; C P West; J D Dawson; B N Doebbeling
Journal:  Fam Med       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 1.756

2.  Do female primary care physicians practise preventive care differently from their male colleagues?

Authors:  C A Woodward; B G Hutchison; J Abelson; G Norman
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  Physician and patient gender concordance and the delivery of comprehensive clinical preventive services.

Authors:  Susan A Flocke; Valerie Gilchrist
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Physician gender and women's preventive services.

Authors:  S D Cassard; C S Weisman; S B Plichta; T L Johnson
Journal:  J Womens Health       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 2.681

5.  Prevention advice rates of women and men physicians.

Authors:  E Frank; L K Harvey
Journal:  Arch Fam Med       Date:  1996-04

6.  Effect of physician and patient gender concordance on patient satisfaction and preventive care practices.

Authors:  J Schmittdiel; K Grumbach; J V Selby; C P Quesenberry
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Physician self-report of comfort and skill in providing preventive care to patients of the opposite sex.

Authors:  N Lurie; K Margolis; P G McGovern; P Mink
Journal:  Arch Fam Med       Date:  1998 Mar-Apr

8.  Gender of physicians and patients and preventive care for community-based older adults.

Authors:  B A Majeroni; J Karuza; C Wade; M McCreadie; E Calkins
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Pract       Date:  1993 Jul-Aug

9.  Are patients of women physicians screened more aggressively? A prospective study of physician gender and screening.

Authors:  M W Kreuter; V J Strecher; R Harris; S C Kobrin; C S Skinner
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  The influence of gender on physician practice style.

Authors:  K D Bertakis; L J Helms; E J Callahan; R Azari; J A Robbins
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 2.983

View more
  9 in total

1.  Opting out of cervical cancer screening: physicians who do not perform pap tests.

Authors:  Crystale Purvis Cooper; Mona Saraiya
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 5.043

2.  How do clinicians use implementation tools to apply breast cancer screening guidelines to practice?

Authors:  Heather Armson; Stefanie Roder; Tom Elmslie; Sobia Khan; Sharon E Straus
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 7.327

3.  Qualitative assessment of attitudes toward cervical cancer (CC) screening and HPV self-sampling among African American (AA) and Sub Saharan African Immigrant (SAI) women.

Authors:  Adebola Adegboyega; Adeyimika T Desmennu; Mark Dignan
Journal:  Ethn Health       Date:  2021-09-19       Impact factor: 2.732

4.  Does Provider Gender Affect the Quality of Primary Care?

Authors:  Jeffrey L Jackson; Amy Farkas; Cecilia Scholcoff
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  The readiness of German GPs to recommend and conduct cancer screening is associated with patient-physician gender concordance. Results of a survey.

Authors:  Jennifer Engler; Anne Dahlhaus; Corina Güthlin
Journal:  Eur J Gen Pract       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 1.904

6.  Intimate patient examinations: The awareness, acceptance and practice preference of transvaginal ultrasound scan among women in a South-southern State of Nigeria.

Authors:  Akintunde O Akintomide; Uzoma O Obasi
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2019-01

7.  Physicians' preventive practices: more frequently performed for male patients and by female physicians.

Authors:  Raphaëlle Delpech; Géraldine Bloy; Henri Panjo; Hector Falcoff; Virginie Ringa; Laurent Rigal
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  High-performing physicians are more likely to participate in a research study: findings from a quality improvement study.

Authors:  Simone Dahrouge; Catherine Deri Armstrong; William Hogg; Jatinderpreet Singh; Clare Liddy
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 4.615

9.  The impact of general practitioners' gender on process indicators in Hungarian primary healthcare: a nation-wide cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Nóra Kovács; Orsolya Varga; Attila Nagy; Anita Pálinkás; Valéria Sipos; László Kőrösi; Róza Ádány; János Sándor
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 2.692

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.