Literature DB >> 23341276

Performance on tests of central auditory processing by individuals exposed to high-intensity blasts.

Frederick J Gallun1, Anna C Diedesch, Lina R Kubli, Therese C Walden, Robert L Folmer, M Samantha Lewis, Daniel J McDermott, Stephen A Fausti, Marjorie R Leek.   

Abstract

Thirty-six blast-exposed patients and twenty-nine non-blast-exposed control subjects were tested on a battery of behavioral and electrophysiological tests that have been shown to be sensitive to central auditory processing deficits. Abnormal performance among the blast-exposed patients was assessed with reference to normative values established as the mean performance on each test by the control subjects plus or minus two standard deviations. Blast-exposed patients performed abnormally at rates significantly above that which would occur by chance on three of the behavioral tests of central auditory processing: the Gaps-In-Noise, Masking Level Difference, and Staggered Spondaic Words tests. The proportion of blast-exposed patients performing abnormally on a speech-in-noise test (Quick Speech-In-Noise) was also significantly above that expected by chance. These results suggest that, for some patients, blast exposure may lead to difficulties with hearing in complex auditory environments, even when peripheral hearing sensitivity is near normal limits.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23341276     DOI: 10.1682/jrrd.2012.03.0038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev        ISSN: 0748-7711


  30 in total

Review 1.  Feasibility of using normobaric hypoxic stress in mTBI research.

Authors:  Patrick M Regan; Joseph Bleiberg; Paul St Onge; Leonard Temme
Journal:  Concussion       Date:  2017-08-22

2.  Brainstem Evoked Potential Indices of Subcortical Auditory Processing After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Kathy R Vander Werff; Brian Rieger
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Differences in postinjury auditory system pathophysiology after mild blast and nonblast acute acoustic trauma.

Authors:  Nicholas Race; Jesyin Lai; Riyi Shi; Edward L Bartlett
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-03-08       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 4.  The Application of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health to Functional Auditory Consequences of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  R Vander Werff Kathy
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2016-08

Review 5.  Cortical and Sensory Causes of Individual Differences in Selective Attention Ability Among Listeners With Normal Hearing Thresholds.

Authors:  Barbara Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Sensory coding and cognitive processing of sound in Veterans with blast exposure.

Authors:  Scott Bressler; Hannah Goldberg; Barbara Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 7.  A perspective on brain-behavior relationships and effects of age and hearing using speech-in-noise stimuli.

Authors:  Curtis J Billings; Brandon M Madsen
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-03-31       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Impaired auditory processing and neural representation of speech in noise among symptomatic post-concussion adults.

Authors:  Kathy R Vander Werff; Brian Rieger
Journal:  Brain Inj       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 2.311

Review 9.  Sensory Sensitivity in TBI: Implications for Chronic Disability.

Authors:  Megan L Callahan; Miranda M Lim
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2018-07-14       Impact factor: 5.081

10.  Analyzing the FFR: A tutorial for decoding the richness of auditory function.

Authors:  Jennifer Krizman; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.