Literature DB >> 23339555

Postoperative performance of the Quartet® left ventricular heart lead.

Gery Tomassoni1, James Baker, Raffaele Corbisiero, Charles Love, David Martin, Imran Niazi, Robert Sheppard, Seth Worley, Scott Beau, G Stephen Greer, Arash Aryana, Michael Cao, Nicole Harbert, Suhong Zhang.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The Quartet(®) left ventricular (LV) lead is the first with 4 pacing electrodes (tip and 3 rings) that enables pacing from 10 different pacing vectors. Postoperative performance of this lead was evaluated in a prospective, nonrandomized, multicenter IDE study.
METHODS: Patients with standard indications for CRT-D were enrolled. Electrical performance and presence of phrenic nerve stimulation (PNS) were assessed during pacing from each of 10 vectors at predischarge (within 7 days), 1 month, and 3 months postimplant.
RESULTS: The Quartet LV lead was implanted successfully in 170 patients (95.5% implant success rate, 68 ± 11 years, 68.5% male, LVEF: 25 ± 7%, NYHA class III: 98.3% and class IV: 1.7%). Mean follow-up was 4.7 ± 1.9 months. Capture threshold and impedance for each of the 10 LV lead pacing vectors remained stable during follow-up. LV lead dislodgement occurred in 6 (3.5%) patients and PNS was observed in 23 (13.5%) patients. PNS was resolved noninvasively in all 23 (100%) patients, either by reprogramming to pace from the additional LV lead pacing vectors alone (13 pts, 56.5%), reprogramming to pace from the additional LV lead pacing vectors and reprogramming pacing output (4 pts, 17.4%), or by reprogramming pacing output alone (6 pts, 26.1%).
CONCLUSIONS: The Quartet LV lead electrical performance was stable and was associated with a high implant success and low dislodgement rate during 3-month follow-up. In all patients with PNS, the 10 pacing vectors combined with reduced output programming enabled the elimination of PNS noninvasively.
© 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23339555     DOI: 10.1111/jce.12065

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1045-3873


  18 in total

Review 1.  Updates in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy for Chronic Heart Failure: Review of Multisite Pacing.

Authors:  Antonios P Antoniadis; Ben Sieniewicz; Justin Gould; Bradley Porter; Jessica Webb; Simon Claridge; Jonathan M Behar; Christopher Aldo Rinaldi
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2017-10

2.  Periprocedural management of cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  John Rickard; Niraj Varma
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2014-04

3.  Improved implant and postoperative lead performance in CRT-D patients implanted with a quadripolar left ventricular lead. A 6-month follow-up analysis from a multicenter prospective comparative study.

Authors:  Giovanni B Forleo; Luigi Di Biase; Germana Panattoni; Massimo Mantica; Quintino Parisi; Annamaria Martino; Augusto Pappalardo; Domenico Sergi; Manfredi Tesauro; Lida P Papavasileiou; Luca Santini; Leonardo Calò; Claudio Tondo; Andrea Natale; Francesco Romeo
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2014-12-13       Impact factor: 1.900

4.  Limitations of chronic delivery of multi-vein left ventricular stimulation for cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Jonathan M Behar; Julian Bostock; Matthew Ginks; Tom Jackson; Manav Sohal; Simon Claridge; Reza Razavi; Christopher Aldo Rinaldi
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 1.900

5.  A Meta-Analysis Of Quadripolar Versus Bipolar Left Ventricular Leads On Post-Procedural Outcomes.

Authors:  Mohit K Turagam; Muhammad R Afzal; Sandia Iskander; Luigi Di Biase; Andrea Natale; Dhanunjaya Lakkireddy
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2016-08-31

Review 6.  Phrenic nerve stimulation in cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Ghassan Moubarak; Abdeslam Bouzeman; Jacky Ollitrault; Frederic Anselme; Serge Cazeau
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 7.  Multisite Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Promise and Pitfalls.

Authors:  Antonios P Antoniadis; Jonathan M Behar; Simon Claridge; Tom Jackson; Manav Sohal; Christopher Aldo Rinaldi
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 8.  Optimizing CRT - Do We Need More Leads and Delivery Methods.

Authors:  Pieter Martens; Frederik Hendrik Verbrugge; Wilfried Mullens
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2015-04-30

9.  Phrenic nerve stimulation in CRT patients and benefits of electronic lead repositioning: the ERACE trial.

Authors:  Stephan Goetze; Pascal Defaye; Alexander Bauer; Matthias Merkel; Olivier Bizeau; Sven Treusch; Klaus Contzen; Claus Juenger; Joachim Winter
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2013-07-19       Impact factor: 1.900

10.  Acute changes in electromechanical parameters during different pacing configurations using a quadripolar left ventricular lead.

Authors:  Cinzia Valzania; Maria J Eriksson; Mauro Biffi; Giuseppe Boriani; Fredrik Gadler
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 1.900

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.