Literature DB >> 23337218

Core domains for a person-focused outcome measurement system in cancer (PROMS-Cancer Core) for routine care: a scoping review and Canadian Delphi Consensus.

Doris Howell1, Margaret Fitch, Debra Bakker, Esther Green, Jonathan Sussman, Samantha Mayo, Shan Mohammed, Charlotte Lee, Diane Doran.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this scoping review study were 1) to identify core domains and dimensions for inclusion in a person-focused and self-reported outcome measurement system for cancer and 2) to reach consensus among key stakeholders including cancer survivors on the relevance, acceptability, and feasibility of a core outcome set for collection in routine clinical care.
METHODS: Following a scoping review of the literature, a Rand Delphi consensus method was used to engage key interdisciplinary decision makers, clinicians, and cancer survivors in reaching consensus on a core patient-reported outcome domain taxonomy and outcome measures.
RESULTS: Of the 21,900 citations identified in the scoping review, 1,503 citations were included in the full article review (380 conceptual articles, 461 psychometric evaluation articles, and 662 intervention studies) and subjected to data abstraction and mapping. Final consensus was reached on 20 domains, related subdimensions, and 45 self-report measures considered relevant and feasible for routine collection in cancer by the Delphi panel (PROMS-Cancer Core).
CONCLUSIONS: Standardization of patient-reported outcome data collection is key to assessing the impact of cancer and treatment on the person for population comparison and monitoring the quality of clinical care. The PROMS-Cancer Core taxonomy of domains and outcome measures can be used to guide the development of a patient-reported outcome information system for cancer.
Copyright © 2013 International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23337218     DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2012.10.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Value Health        ISSN: 1098-3015            Impact factor:   5.725


  18 in total

Review 1.  Cancer survivorship monitoring systems for the collection of patient-reported outcomes: a systematic narrative review of international approaches.

Authors:  N Corsini; J Fish; I Ramsey; G Sharplin; I Flight; R Damarell; B Wiggins; C Wilson; D Roder; M Eckert
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 4.442

Review 2.  The story behind the synthesis: writing an effective introduction to your scoping review.

Authors:  Lorelei Lingard; Heather Colquhoun
Journal:  Perspect Med Educ       Date:  2022-08-12

Review 3.  Toward the development of a comprehensive cancer experience measurement framework.

Authors:  Carmen G Loiselle; Doris Howell; Irene Nicoll; Margaret Fitch
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 4.  Recommended patient-reported core set of symptoms to measure in adult cancer treatment trials.

Authors:  Bryce B Reeve; Sandra A Mitchell; Amylou C Dueck; Ethan Basch; David Cella; Carolyn Miller Reilly; Lori M Minasian; Andrea M Denicoff; Ann M O'Mara; Michael J Fisch; Cynthia Chauhan; Neil K Aaronson; Corneel Coens; Deborah Watkins Bruner
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  PRO-ONKO-selection of patient-reported outcome assessments for the clinical use in cancer patients-a mixed-method multicenter cross-sectional exploratory study.

Authors:  Heike Schmidt; Daniela Merkel; Michael Koehler; Hans-Henning Flechtner; Jörg Sigle; Bernd Klinge; Karin Jordan; Dirk Vordermark; Margarete Landenberger; Patrick Jahn
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  Personal Accounts of Young-Onset Colorectal Cancer Organized as Patient-Reported Data: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study.

Authors:  Klay Lamprell; Diana Fajardo Pulido; Yvonne Tran; Bróna Nic Giolla Easpaig; Winston Liauw; Gaston Arnolda; Jeffrey Braithwaite
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2021-02-26

7.  Danish translation, cultural adaption and initial psychometric evaluation of the patient feedback form.

Authors:  Lærke K Tolstrup; Helle Pappot; Graziella Zangger; Lars Bastholt; Ann-Dorthe Zwisler; Karin B Dieperink
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2018-04-27       Impact factor: 3.186

8.  Patient-reporting improves estimates of postoperative complication rates: a prospective cohort study in gynaecological oncology.

Authors:  R Iyer; A Gentry-Maharaj; A Nordin; R Liston; M Burnell; N Das; R Desai; R Gornall; A Beardmore-Gray; K Hillaby; S Leeson; A Linder; A Lopes; D Meechan; T Mould; J Nevin; A Olaitan; B Rufford; A Ryan; S Shanbhag; A Thackeray; N Wood; K Reynolds; U Menon
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Determinants of patient-reported experience of cancer services responsiveness.

Authors:  Dominique Tremblay; Danièle Roberge; Djamal Berbiche
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Multidisciplinary teams and ICT: a qualitative study exploring the use of technology and its impact on multidisciplinary team meetings.

Authors:  Anna Janssen; Tracy Robinson; Melissa Brunner; Paul Harnett; Kylie E Museth; Tim Shaw
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.