Literature DB >> 23337080

Forgetting at short term: when do event-based interference and temporal factors have an effect?

Pierre Barrouillet1, Gaën Plancher, Alessandro Guida, Valérie Camos.   

Abstract

Memory tasks combining storage and distracting tasks performed at either encoding or retrieval have provided divergent results pointing towards accounts of forgetting in terms of either temporal decay or event-based interference respectively. The aim of this study was to shed light on the possible sources of such a divergence that could rely on methodological aspects or deeper differences in the memory traces elicited by the different paradigms used. Methodological issues were explored in a first series of experiments by introducing at retrieval computer-paced distracting tasks that involved articulatory suppression, attentional demand, or both. A second series of experiments that used a similar design was intended to induce differences in the nature of memory traces by increasing the time allowed for encoding the to-be-remembered items. Although the introduction of computer-paced distracting tasks allowed for a strict control of temporal parameters, the first series of experiments replicated the effects usually attributed to event-based interference. However, deeper encoding abolished these effects while time-related effects remained unchanged. These findings suggest that the interplay between temporal factors and event-based interference in forgetting at short term is more complex than expected and could depend on the nature of memory traces.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23337080     DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.12.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)        ISSN: 0001-6918


  10 in total

1.  Do familiar memory items decay?

Authors:  Timothy J Ricker; Joshua Sandry; Evie Vergauwe; Nelson Cowan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Central and peripheral components of working memory storage.

Authors:  Nelson Cowan; J Scott Saults; Christopher L Blume
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2014-05-26

3.  On some of the main criticisms of the modal model: Reappraisal from a TBRS perspective.

Authors:  Gaën Plancher; Pierre Barrouillet
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2020-04

4.  What do people typically do between list items? The nature of attention-based mnemonic activities depends on task context.

Authors:  Evie Vergauwe; Timothy J Ricker; Naomi Langerock; Nelson Cowan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 5.  Attention in working memory: attention is needed but it yearns to be free.

Authors:  Stephen Rhodes; Nelson Cowan
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 5.691

6.  Shared cognitive resources between memory and attention during sound-sequence encoding.

Authors:  Aurélie Bidet-Caulet; Anne Caclin; Salomé Blain; Francesca Talamini; Lesly Fornoni
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Serial position markers in space: visuospatial priming of serial order working memory retrieval.

Authors:  Maya De Belder; Elger Abrahamse; Mauro Kerckhof; Wim Fias; Jean-Philippe van Dijck
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Does Controlling for Temporal Parameters Change the Levels-of-Processing Effect in Working Memory?

Authors:  Vanessa M Loaiza; Valérie Camos
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2016-03-31

9.  A Computational Model of Working Memory Integrating Time-Based Decay and Interference.

Authors:  Benoît Lemaire; Sophie Portrat
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-04-03

10.  Two systems of maintenance in verbal working memory: evidence from the word length effect.

Authors:  Gérôme Mora; Valérie Camos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.