Literature DB >> 35106682

Shared cognitive resources between memory and attention during sound-sequence encoding.

Aurélie Bidet-Caulet1,2, Anne Caclin1,2, Salomé Blain3,4, Francesca Talamini1,2,5, Lesly Fornoni1,2.   

Abstract

You are on the phone, walking down a street. This daily situation calls for selective attention, allowing you to ignore surrounding irrelevant sounds, while trying to encode in memory the relevant information from the phone. Attention and memory are indeed two cognitive functions that are interacting constantly. However, their interaction is not yet well characterized during sound-sequence encoding. We independently manipulated both selective attention and working memory in a delayed-matching-to-sample of two tone-series, played successively in one ear. During the first melody presentation (memory encoding), weakly or highly distracting melodies were played in the other ear. Detection of the difference between the two comparison melodies could be easy or difficult, requiring low- or high-precision encoding, i.e., low or high memory load. Sixteen non-musician and 16 musician participants performed this new task. As expected, both groups of participants were less accurate in the difficult memory task and in difficult-to-ignore distractor conditions. Importantly, an interaction between memory-task difficulty and distractor difficulty was found in both groups. Non-musicians presented less difference between easy and difficult-to-ignore distractors in the difficult than in the easy memory task. On the contrary, musicians, with better performance than non-musicians, showed a greater difference between easy and difficult-to-ignore distractors in the difficult than in the easy memory task. In a second experiment including trials without a distractor, we could show that these effects are in line with the cognitive load theory. Taken together, these results speak for shared cognitive resources between working memory and attention during sound-sequence encoding.
© 2022. The Psychonomic Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attentional filtering; Auditory; Memory encoding; Non-verbal; Selective attention; Working memory

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35106682     DOI: 10.3758/s13414-021-02390-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  41 in total

1.  Overlapping mechanisms of attention and spatial working memory.

Authors:  E Awh; J Jonides
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2001-03-01       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  The role of spatial selective attention in working memory for locations: evidence from event-related potentials.

Authors:  E Awh; L Anllo-Vento; S A Hillyard
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 3.  Working memory.

Authors:  A Baddeley
Journal:  Science       Date:  1992-01-31       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Enhancement of auditory-evoked potentials in musicians reflects an influence of expertise but not selective attention.

Authors:  Simon Baumann; Martin Meyer; Lutz Jäncke
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Rehearsal in spatial working memory.

Authors:  E Awh; J Jonides; P A Reuter-Lorenz
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 6.  Theories of Working Memory: Differences in Definition, Degree of Modularity, Role of Attention, and Purpose.

Authors:  Eryn J Adams; Anh T Nguyen; Nelson Cowan
Journal:  Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  Forgetting at short term: when do event-based interference and temporal factors have an effect?

Authors:  Pierre Barrouillet; Gaën Plancher; Alessandro Guida; Valérie Camos
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2013-01-19

8.  Impaired pitch perception and memory in congenital amusia: the deficit starts in the auditory cortex.

Authors:  Philippe Albouy; Jérémie Mattout; Romain Bouet; Emmanuel Maby; Gaëtan Sanchez; Pierre-Emmanuel Aguera; Sébastien Daligault; Claude Delpuech; Olivier Bertrand; Anne Caclin; Barbara Tillmann
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 13.501

9.  Specialized neural dynamics for verbal and tonal memory: fMRI evidence in congenital amusia.

Authors:  Philippe Albouy; Isabelle Peretz; Patrick Bermudez; Robert J Zatorre; Barbara Tillmann; Anne Caclin
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 5.038

10.  Impaired encoding of rapid pitch information underlies perception and memory deficits in congenital amusia.

Authors:  Philippe Albouy; Marion Cousineau; Anne Caclin; Barbara Tillmann; Isabelle Peretz
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.