Literature DB >> 23336958

Fragmented QRS complexes are not hallmarks of myocardial injury as detected by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Min-Soo Ahn1, Jin-Bae Kim, Byung-Su Yoo, Jun-Won Lee, Ji Hyun Lee, Young Jin Youn, Sung Gyun Ahn, Jang-Young Kim, Seung-Hwan Lee, Junghan Yoon, Kyung-Hoon Choe.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Q waves on a 12-lead electrocardiography (ECG) are considered to be classic hallmarks of prior myocardial infarction. However, one study suggested that the fragmented QRS complex (fQRS) on ECG is a highly sensitive and specific marker of myocardial scarring on a nuclear stress test. The study aimed to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of fragmented QRS complexes compared with Q waves for myocardial injury detected by delayed contrast-enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (DE-CMRI) in subjects with acute myocardial infarction.
METHODS: Electrocardiograms of 190 subjects with myocardial infarction who underwent DE-CMR were analyzed. fQRS was defined by the presence of an additional R wave (R″), or notching of the S wave, or more than one R' in two contiguous leads.
RESULTS: Delayed enhancement was observed in 180 (94.7%) patients. Transmural enhancement was noted in 78 (43.3%) and subendocardial enhancement in 102 (56.7%) patients. The sensitivity and specificity of Q waved and fQRS for diagnosing delayed enhancement were 59.4% vs. 66.7% and 90.0% vs. 40.0%. The area under the receiver-operator characteristics curve of delayed enhancement was 0.75 for Q waves and 0.53 for fQRS (p=0.04). The areas under the ROC curves of the transmurality of delayed enhancement were 0.44 for fQRS and 0.58 for Q waves (p=0.73).
CONCLUSIONS: fQRS has poor accuracy for the detection of myocardial injury compared with Q waves. fQRS and Q waves are not valuable tools for the diagnosis transmural irreversible myocardial injury in acute myocardial infarction.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Electrocardiography; Magnetic resonance imaging; Myocardial infarction

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23336958     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.12.086

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiol        ISSN: 0167-5273            Impact factor:   4.164


  9 in total

Review 1.  Total Mortality, Major Adverse Cardiac Events, and Echocardiographic-Derived Cardiac Parameters with Fragmented QRS Complex.

Authors:  Bojun Gong; Zicheng Li
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2015-11-02       Impact factor: 1.468

Review 2.  The role of fQRS in coronary artery disease. A meta-analysis of observational studies.

Authors:  Y Xu; Z Qiu; Y Xu; H Bao; S Gao; X Cheng
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 1.443

3.  Fragmented QRS on surface electrocardiogram is not a reliable predictor of myocardial scar, angiographic coronary disease or long term adverse outcomes.

Authors:  Dee Dee Wang; Amit Tibrewala; Phuc Nguygen; Tanmay Swadia; Gordon Jacobsen; Arfaat Khan; Karthik Ananthasubramaniam
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2014-08

4.  Correlation of left ventricular ejection fraction drop and fragmented QRS with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Armin Bordbar; Khalil Mahmoodi; Haleh Anasori; Ramazan Fallah; Seyede Vanoushe Azimi-Pirsaraei
Journal:  ARYA Atheroscler       Date:  2021-09

5.  QRS Fragmentation Patterns Representing Myocardial Scar Need to Be Separated from Benign Normal Variants: Hypotheses and Proposal for Morphology based Classification.

Authors:  M Anette E Haukilahti; Antti Eranti; Tuomas Kenttä; Heikki V Huikuri
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2016-12-26       Impact factor: 4.566

6.  Fragmented QRS and abnormal creatine kinase-MB are predictors of coronary artery disease in patients with angina and normal electrocardiographys.

Authors:  Jung Joo Lee; Jae Hoon Lee; Jin Woo Jeong; Jun Young Chung
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  2017-04-17       Impact factor: 2.884

7.  The Difference on Features of Fragmented QRS Complex and Influences on Mortality in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Authors:  Di Liang; Jingyi Zhang; Li Lin; Wenxia Zong
Journal:  Acta Cardiol Sin       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 2.672

8.  QRS-T-angle in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) - a Comparison with Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  B Zadeh; J M Wambach; M Lambers; K Nassenstein; C J Jensen; O Bruder
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2020-08-25       Impact factor: 3.738

9.  Estimating Myocardial Infarction Size With a Simple Electrocardiographic Marker Score.

Authors:  Daniel C Lee; Christine M Albert; Dhiraj Narula; Alan H Kadish; Gopi Krishna Panicker; Edwin Wu; Andi Schaechter; Julie Pester; Neal A Chatterjee; Nancy R Cook; Jeffrey J Goldberger
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 5.501

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.