Literature DB >> 23335579

Sources of uncertainty in intuitive physics.

Kevin A Smith1, Edward Vul.   

Abstract

Recent work suggests that people predict how objects interact in a manner consistent with Newtonian physics, but with additional uncertainty. However, the sources of uncertainty have not been examined. In this study, we measure perceptual noise in initial conditions and stochasticity in the physical model used to make predictions. Participants predicted the trajectory of a moving object through occluded motion and bounces, and we compared their behavior to an ideal observer model. We found that human judgments cannot be captured by simple heuristics and must incorporate noisy dynamics. Moreover, these judgments are biased consistently with a prior expectation on object destinations, suggesting that people use simple expectations about outcomes to compensate for uncertainty about their physical models.
Copyright © 2013 Cognitive Science Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23335579     DOI: 10.1111/tops.12009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Top Cogn Sci        ISSN: 1756-8757


  14 in total

1.  Functional neuroanatomy of intuitive physical inference.

Authors:  Jason Fischer; John G Mikhael; Joshua B Tenenbaum; Nancy Kanwisher
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Rapid trial-and-error learning with simulation supports flexible tool use and physical reasoning.

Authors:  Kelsey R Allen; Kevin A Smith; Joshua B Tenenbaum
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Dissociating intuitive physics from intuitive psychology: Evidence from Williams syndrome.

Authors:  Frederik S Kamps; Joshua B Julian; Peter Battaglia; Barbara Landau; Nancy Kanwisher; Daniel D Dilks
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2017-07-03

4.  Humans use predictive kinematic models to calibrate visual cues to three-dimensional surface slant.

Authors:  Peter Scarfe; Andrew Glennerster
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Simulation as an engine of physical scene understanding.

Authors:  Peter W Battaglia; Jessica B Hamrick; Joshua B Tenenbaum
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  When it all falls down: the relationship between intuitive physics and spatial cognition.

Authors:  Alex Mitko; Jason Fischer
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2020-05-19

7.  Modeling human intuitions about liquid flow with particle-based simulation.

Authors:  Christopher J Bates; Ilker Yildirim; Joshua B Tenenbaum; Peter Battaglia
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2019-07-22       Impact factor: 4.475

8.  Children's exploratory play tracks the discriminability of hypotheses.

Authors:  Max H Siegel; Rachel W Magid; Madeline Pelz; Joshua B Tenenbaum; Laura E Schulz
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Testing Bayesian and heuristic predictions of mass judgments of colliding objects.

Authors:  Adam N Sanborn
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-08-26

10.  Late Bayesian inference in mental transformations.

Authors:  Evan D Remington; Tiffany V Parks; Mehrdad Jazayeri
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.