Literature DB >> 33229515

Rapid trial-and-error learning with simulation supports flexible tool use and physical reasoning.

Kelsey R Allen1,2, Kevin A Smith3,2, Joshua B Tenenbaum3,2.   

Abstract

Many animals, and an increasing number of artificial agents, display sophisticated capabilities to perceive and manipulate objects. But human beings remain distinctive in their capacity for flexible, creative tool use-using objects in new ways to act on the world, achieve a goal, or solve a problem. To study this type of general physical problem solving, we introduce the Virtual Tools game. In this game, people solve a large range of challenging physical puzzles in just a handful of attempts. We propose that the flexibility of human physical problem solving rests on an ability to imagine the effects of hypothesized actions, while the efficiency of human search arises from rich action priors which are updated via observations of the world. We instantiate these components in the "sample, simulate, update" (SSUP) model and show that it captures human performance across 30 levels of the Virtual Tools game. More broadly, this model provides a mechanism for explaining how people condense general physical knowledge into actionable, task-specific plans to achieve flexible and efficient physical problem solving.

Entities:  

Keywords:  intuitive physics; physical problem solving; tool use

Year:  2020        PMID: 33229515      PMCID: PMC7703630          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1912341117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  14 in total

1.  Imaginative Reinforcement Learning: Computational Principles and Neural Mechanisms.

Authors:  Samuel J Gershman; Jimmy Zhou; Cody Kommers
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 2.  Where Does Value Come From?

Authors:  Keno Juechems; Christopher Summerfield
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  Retrospective revaluation in sequential decision making: a tale of two systems.

Authors:  Samuel J Gershman; Arthur B Markman; A Ross Otto
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2012-12-10

4.  The cognitive bases of human tool use.

Authors:  Krist Vaesen
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 12.579

5.  Reconciling intuitive physics and Newtonian mechanics for colliding objects.

Authors:  Adam N Sanborn; Vikash K Mansinghka; Thomas L Griffiths
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2013-03-04       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  The neural basis of tool use.

Authors:  G Goldenberg; J Spatt
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 13.501

7.  Tool use and affordance: Manipulation-based versus reasoning-based approaches.

Authors:  François Osiurak; Arnaud Badets
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Simulation as an engine of physical scene understanding.

Authors:  Peter W Battaglia; Jessica B Hamrick; Joshua B Tenenbaum
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Using the Aesop's fable paradigm to investigate causal understanding of water displacement by New Caledonian crows.

Authors:  Sarah A Jelbert; Alex H Taylor; Lucy G Cheke; Nicola S Clayton; Russell D Gray
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The neural basis of human tool use.

Authors:  Guy A Orban; Fausto Caruana
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-04-09
View more
  3 in total

1.  The brain produces mind by modeling.

Authors:  Richard M Shiffrin; Danielle S Bassett; Nikolaus Kriegeskorte; Joshua B Tenenbaum
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Invariant representation of physical stability in the human brain.

Authors:  R T Pramod; Michael A Cohen; Joshua B Tenenbaum; Nancy Kanwisher
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 8.713

3.  Characterising factors underlying praxis deficits in chronic left hemisphere stroke patients.

Authors:  Elisabeth Rounis; Ajay Halai; Gloria Pizzamiglio; Matthew A Lambon Ralph
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2021-05-29       Impact factor: 4.644

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.