Literature DB >> 28683351

Dissociating intuitive physics from intuitive psychology: Evidence from Williams syndrome.

Frederik S Kamps1, Joshua B Julian2, Peter Battaglia3, Barbara Landau4, Nancy Kanwisher3, Daniel D Dilks5.   

Abstract

Prior work suggests that our understanding of how things work ("intuitive physics") and how people work ("intuitive psychology") are distinct domains of human cognition. Here we directly test the dissociability of these two domains by investigating knowledge of intuitive physics and intuitive psychology in adults with Williams syndrome (WS) - a genetic developmental disorder characterized by severely impaired spatial cognition, but relatively spared social cognition. WS adults and mental-age matched (MA) controls completed an intuitive physics task and an intuitive psychology task. If intuitive physics is a distinct domain (from intuitive psychology), then we should observe differential impairment on the physics task for individuals with WS compared to MA controls. Indeed, adults with WS performed significantly worse on the intuitive physics than the intuitive psychology task, relative to controls. These results support the hypothesis that knowledge of the physical world can be disrupted independently from knowledge of the social world.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Naïve physics; Naïve psychology; Physical reasoning; Social perception; Williams-Beuren syndrome (WS)

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28683351      PMCID: PMC5572752          DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.06.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  34 in total

1.  Domain specificity in conceptual development: neuropsychological evidence from autism.

Authors:  A M Leslie; L Thaiss
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1992-06

2.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

3.  Inferring mass in complex scenes by mental simulation.

Authors:  Jessica B Hamrick; Peter W Battaglia; Thomas L Griffiths; Joshua B Tenenbaum
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2016-09-02

4.  Divided attention, selective attention and drawing: processing preferences in Williams syndrome are dependent on the task administered.

Authors:  Emily K Farran; Christopher Jarrold; Susan E Gathercole
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Young infants' reasoning about physical events involving inert and self-propelled objects.

Authors:  Yuyan Luo; Lisa Kaufman; Renée Baillargeon
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2009-02-20       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Visual and spatial working memory dissociation: evidence from Williams syndrome.

Authors:  Stefano Vicari; Samantha Bellucci; Giovanni Augusto Carlesimo
Journal:  Dev Med Child Neurol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 5.449

7.  Distinctive personality characteristics of 8-, 9-, and 10-year-olds with Williams syndrome.

Authors:  Bonita P Klein-Tasman; Carolyn B Mervis
Journal:  Dev Neuropsychol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.253

8.  Sources of uncertainty in intuitive physics.

Authors:  Kevin A Smith; Edward Vul
Journal:  Top Cogn Sci       Date:  2013-01

9.  Vision for perception and vision for action: normal and unusual development.

Authors:  Daniel D Dilks; James E Hoffman; Barbara Landau
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2008-07

10.  Simulation as an engine of physical scene understanding.

Authors:  Peter W Battaglia; Jessica B Hamrick; Joshua B Tenenbaum
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  1 in total

1.  When it all falls down: the relationship between intuitive physics and spatial cognition.

Authors:  Alex Mitko; Jason Fischer
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2020-05-19
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.