Literature DB >> 23335338

A novel generalized ridge regression method for quantitative genetics.

Xia Shen1, Moudud Alam, Freddy Fikse, Lars Rönnegård.   

Abstract

As the molecular marker density grows, there is a strong need in both genome-wide association studies and genomic selection to fit models with a large number of parameters. Here we present a computationally efficient generalized ridge regression (RR) algorithm for situations in which the number of parameters largely exceeds the number of observations. The computationally demanding parts of the method depend mainly on the number of observations and not the number of parameters. The algorithm was implemented in the R package bigRR based on the previously developed package hglm. Using such an approach, a heteroscedastic effects model (HEM) was also developed, implemented, and tested. The efficiency for different data sizes were evaluated via simulation. The method was tested for a bacteria-hypersensitive trait in a publicly available Arabidopsis data set including 84 inbred lines and 216,130 SNPs. The computation of all the SNP effects required <10 sec using a single 2.7-GHz core. The advantage in run time makes permutation test feasible for such a whole-genome model, so that a genome-wide significance threshold can be obtained. HEM was found to be more robust than ordinary RR (a.k.a. SNP-best linear unbiased prediction) in terms of QTL mapping, because SNP-specific shrinkage was applied instead of a common shrinkage. The proposed algorithm was also assessed for genomic evaluation and was shown to give better predictions than ordinary RR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23335338      PMCID: PMC3606101          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.112.146720

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  28 in total

Review 1.  Commercial application of marker- and gene-assisted selection in livestock: strategies and lessons.

Authors:  J C M Dekkers
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Increasing the efficiency of variance component quantitative trait loci analysis by using reduced-rank identity-by-descent matrices.

Authors:  Lars Rönnegård; Kateryna Mischenko; Sverker Holmgren; Orjan Carlborg
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-05-04       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 3.  Genome-wide association studies: progress and potential for drug discovery and development.

Authors:  Stephen F Kingsmore; Ingrid E Lindquist; Joann Mudge; Damian D Gessler; William D Beavis
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 84.694

4.  Accommodating linkage disequilibrium in genetic-association analyses via ridge regression.

Authors:  Nathalie Malo; Ondrej Libiger; Nicholas J Schork
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions.

Authors:  P M VanRaden
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.034

6.  Common SNPs explain a large proportion of the heritability for human height.

Authors:  Jian Yang; Beben Benyamin; Brian P McEvoy; Scott Gordon; Anjali K Henders; Dale R Nyholt; Pamela A Madden; Andrew C Heath; Nicholas G Martin; Grant W Montgomery; Michael E Goddard; Peter M Visscher
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2010-06-20       Impact factor: 38.330

7.  Genome partitioning of genetic variation for complex traits using common SNPs.

Authors:  Jian Yang; Teri A Manolio; Louis R Pasquale; Eric Boerwinkle; Neil Caporaso; Julie M Cunningham; Mariza de Andrade; Bjarke Feenstra; Eleanor Feingold; M Geoffrey Hayes; William G Hill; Maria Teresa Landi; Alvaro Alonso; Guillaume Lettre; Peng Lin; Hua Ling; William Lowe; Rasika A Mathias; Mads Melbye; Elizabeth Pugh; Marilyn C Cornelis; Bruce S Weir; Michael E Goddard; Peter M Visscher
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2011-05-08       Impact factor: 38.330

8.  Genome-wide association study of 107 phenotypes in Arabidopsis thaliana inbred lines.

Authors:  Susanna Atwell; Yu S Huang; Bjarni J Vilhjálmsson; Glenda Willems; Matthew Horton; Yan Li; Dazhe Meng; Alexander Platt; Aaron M Tarone; Tina T Hu; Rong Jiang; N Wayan Muliyati; Xu Zhang; Muhammad Ali Amer; Ivan Baxter; Benjamin Brachi; Joanne Chory; Caroline Dean; Marilyne Debieu; Juliette de Meaux; Joseph R Ecker; Nathalie Faure; Joel M Kniskern; Jonathan D G Jones; Todd Michael; Adnane Nemri; Fabrice Roux; David E Salt; Chunlao Tang; Marco Todesco; M Brian Traw; Detlef Weigel; Paul Marjoram; Justin O Borevitz; Joy Bergelson; Magnus Nordborg
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Hierarchical likelihood opens a new way of estimating genetic values using genome-wide dense marker maps.

Authors:  Xia Shen; Lars Rönnegård; Orjan Carlborg
Journal:  BMC Proc       Date:  2011-05-27

10.  Simulated data for genomic selection and genome-wide association studies using a combination of coalescent and gene drop methods.

Authors:  John M Hickey; Gregor Gorjanc
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2012-04-01       Impact factor: 3.154

View more
  34 in total

1.  Exploiting Linkage Disequilibrium for Ultrahigh-Dimensional Genome-Wide Data with an Integrated Statistical Approach.

Authors:  Michelle Carlsen; Guifang Fu; Shaun Bushman; Christopher Corcoran
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-12-12       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Genome-Wide Association Mapping and Genomic Prediction Elucidate the Genetic Architecture of Morphological Traits in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Rik Kooke; Willem Kruijer; Ralph Bours; Frank Becker; André Kuhn; Henri van de Geest; Jaap Buntjer; Timo Doeswijk; José Guerra; Harro Bouwmeester; Dick Vreugdenhil; Joost J B Keurentjes
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 8.340

3.  A comparison of genomic selection models across time in interior spruce (Picea engelmannii × glauca) using unordered SNP imputation methods.

Authors:  B Ratcliffe; O G El-Dien; J Klápště; I Porth; C Chen; B Jaquish; Y A El-Kassaby
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 3.821

4.  An efficient method to handle the 'large p, small n' problem for genomewide association studies using Haseman-Elston regression.

Authors:  Bujun Mei; Zhihua Wang
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 1.166

5.  A linear mixed model framework for gene-based gene-environment interaction tests in twin studies.

Authors:  Brandon J Coombes; Saonli Basu; Matt McGue
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 2.135

6.  DAIRRy-BLUP: a high-performance computing approach to genomic prediction.

Authors:  Arne De Coninck; Jan Fostier; Steven Maenhout; Bernard De Baets
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Digital Imaging Combined with Genome-Wide Association Mapping Links Loci to Plant-Pathogen Interaction Traits.

Authors:  Rachel F Fordyce; Nicole E Soltis; Celine Caseys; Raoni Gwinner; Jason A Corwin; Susana Atwell; Daniel Copeland; Julie Feusier; Anushriya Subedy; Robert Eshbaugh; Daniel J Kliebenstein
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 8.340

8.  Network-Guided GWAS Improves Identification of Genes Affecting Free Amino Acids.

Authors:  Ruthie Angelovici; Albert Batushansky; Nicholas Deason; Sabrina Gonzalez-Jorge; Michael A Gore; Aaron Fait; Dean DellaPenna
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 8.340

9.  Genome-wide association studies using binned genotypes.

Authors:  Bingxing An; Xue Gao; Tianpeng Chang; Jiangwei Xia; Xiaoqiao Wang; Jian Miao; Lingyang Xu; Lupei Zhang; Yan Chen; Junya Li; Shizhong Xu; Huijiang Gao
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 3.821

10.  NeuralLasso: Neural Networks Meet Lasso in Genomic Prediction.

Authors:  Boby Mathew; Andreas Hauptmann; Jens Léon; Mikko J Sillanpää
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 6.627

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.