Literature DB >> 23335321

Source confusion is a major cause of crowding.

Hans Strasburger1, Maka Malania.   

Abstract

The loss of positional information for whole letters is one of the most important factors contributing to impaired letter and word recognition. Here we study the quantitative characteristics of flanker confusions in a crowding paradigm and test whether transient spatial attention relieves the crowding effect by reducing flanker confusions. We examined the crowding effect at three eccentricities for a range of flanker distances and attentional cue sizes. The effects of flanker distance confirm earlier findings that errors of both content and position are highest with flankers close by. However, the cue has no effect on flanker confusions and affects content information only, by enhancing target contrast sensitivity independent of cue size. Confusions with the inward, but not the outward, flanker increase linearly with eccentricity. Inward-flanker confusions dominate unlike reported asymmetries for masking. Our results are a psychophysical counterpart to separate neural coding of what and where in pattern recognition. The dependencies of cue effect and confusions on flanker distance scale with eccentricity and can be described by a generalized Bouma critical-separation rule. That rule shows a formal analogy to M scaling, from which the critical crowding distances on a cortical map can be derived as a logarithmic function. The perceptual results are visualized in a "doughnut" model.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23335321     DOI: 10.1167/13.1.24

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  29 in total

1.  Substitution and pooling in visual crowding induced by similar and dissimilar distractors.

Authors:  Edward F Ester; Emma Zilber; John T Serences
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Nonspecific competition underlies transient attention.

Authors:  Anna Wilschut; Jan Theeuwes; Christian N L Olivers
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-09-04

3.  Sensory factors limiting horizontal and vertical visual span for letter recognition.

Authors:  Deyue Yu; Gordon E Legge; Gunther Wagoner; Susana T L Chung
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Stimulus conflation and tuning selectivity in V4 neurons: a model of visual crowding.

Authors:  Brad C Motter
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  A Unifying Model of Orientation Crowding in Peripheral Vision.

Authors:  William J Harrison; Peter J Bex
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  Masking, crowding, and grouping: Connecting low and mid-level vision.

Authors:  Josephine Reuther; Ramakrishna Chakravarthi; Jasna Martinovic
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Visual crowding cannot be wholly explained by feature pooling.

Authors:  Edward F Ester; Daniel Klee; Edward Awh
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2013-12-23       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Reply to Pachai et al.

Authors:  William J Harrison; Peter J Bex
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 10.834

9.  Effects of crowding and attention on high-levels of motion processing and motion adaptation.

Authors:  Andrea Pavan; Mark W Greenlee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-01-23       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  A Comparison of Foveal and Peripheral Contour Interaction and Crowding.

Authors:  Stephanie M Marten-Ellis; Harold E Bedell
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 2.106

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.