Literature DB >> 23334409

Sustainable bioenergy production from marginal lands in the US Midwest.

Ilya Gelfand1, Ritvik Sahajpal, Xuesong Zhang, R César Izaurralde, Katherine L Gross, G Philip Robertson.   

Abstract

Legislation on biofuels production in the USA and Europe is directing food crops towards the production of grain-based ethanol, which can have detrimental consequences for soil carbon sequestration, nitrous oxide emissions, nitrate pollution, biodiversity and human health. An alternative is to grow lignocellulosic (cellulosic) crops on 'marginal' lands. Cellulosic feedstocks can have positive environmental outcomes and could make up a substantial proportion of future energy portfolios. However, the availability of marginal lands for cellulosic feedstock production, and the resulting greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, remains uncertain. Here we evaluate the potential for marginal lands in ten Midwestern US states to produce sizeable amounts of biomass and concurrently mitigate GHG emissions. In a comparative assessment of six alternative cropping systems over 20 years, we found that successional herbaceous vegetation, once well established, has a direct GHG emissions mitigation capacity that rivals that of purpose-grown crops (-851 ± 46 grams of CO(2) equivalent emissions per square metre per year (gCO(2)e m(-2) yr(-1))). If fertilized, these communities have the capacity to produce about 63 ± 5 gigajoules of ethanol energy per hectare per year. By contrast, an adjacent, no-till corn-soybean-wheat rotation produces on average 41 ± 1 gigajoules of biofuel energy per hectare per year and has a net direct mitigation capacity of -397 ± 32 gCO(2)e m(-2) yr(-1); a continuous corn rotation would probably produce about 62 ± 7 gigajoules of biofuel energy per hectare per year, with 13% less mitigation. We also perform quantitative modelling of successional vegetation on marginal lands in the region at a resolution of 0.4 hectares, constrained by the requirement that each modelled location be within 80 kilometres of a potential biorefinery. Our results suggest that such vegetation could produce about 21 gigalitres of ethanol per year from around 11 million hectares, or approximately 25 per cent of the 2022 target for cellulosic biofuel mandated by the US Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007, with no initial carbon debt nor the indirect land-use costs associated with food-based biofuels. Other regional-scale aspects of biofuel sustainability, such as water quality and biodiversity, await future study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23334409     DOI: 10.1038/nature11811

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  20 in total

1.  Greenhouse gases in intensive agriculture: contributions of individual gases to the radiative forcing of the atmosphere

Authors: 
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-09-15       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Bird communities in future bioenergy landscapes of the Upper Midwest.

Authors:  Timothy D Meehan; Allen H Hurlbert; Claudio Gratton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Ethanol can contribute to energy and environmental goals.

Authors:  Alexander E Farrell; Richard J Plevin; Brian T Turner; Andrew D Jones; Michael O'Hare; Daniel M Kammen
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-01-27       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Energy. Driving on biomass.

Authors:  John Ohlrogge; Doug Allen; Bill Berguson; Dean Dellapenna; Yair Shachar-Hill; Sten Stymne
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-05-22       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Increasing corn for biofuel production reduces biocontrol services in agricultural landscapes.

Authors:  Douglas A Landis; Mary M Gardiner; Wopke van der Werf; Scott M Swinton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Climate change and health costs of air emissions from biofuels and gasoline.

Authors:  Jason Hill; Stephen Polasky; Erik Nelson; David Tilman; Hong Huo; Lindsay Ludwig; James Neumann; Haochi Zheng; Diego Bonta
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-02-02       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Climate change. Fixing a critical climate accounting error.

Authors:  Timothy D Searchinger; Steven P Hamburg; Jerry Melillo; William Chameides; Petr Havlik; Daniel M Kammen; Gene E Likens; Ruben N Lubowski; Michael Obersteiner; Michael Oppenheimer; G Philip Robertson; William H Schlesinger; G David Tilman
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-10-23       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Carbon-negative biofuels from low-input high-diversity grassland biomass.

Authors:  David Tilman; Jason Hill; Clarence Lehman
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-12-08       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 9.  Carbon emission from farm operations.

Authors:  R Lal
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 9.621

10.  Net energy of cellulosic ethanol from switchgrass.

Authors:  M R Schmer; K P Vogel; R B Mitchell; R K Perrin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-01-07       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  58 in total

1.  Plant community responses to long-term fertilization: changes in functional group abundance drive changes in species richness.

Authors:  Timothy L Dickson; Katherine L Gross
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Bioenergy and Biodiversity: Key Lessons from the Pan American Region.

Authors:  Keith L Kline; Fernanda Silva Martinelli; Audrey L Mayer; Rodrigo Medeiros; Camila Ortolan F Oliveira; Gerd Sparovek; Arnaldo Walter; Lisa A Venier
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  Bioenergy: Biofuel production on the margins.

Authors:  Klaus Butterbach-Bahl; Ralf Kiese
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Perennial grasslands enhance biodiversity and multiple ecosystem services in bioenergy landscapes.

Authors:  Ben P Werling; Timothy L Dickson; Rufus Isaacs; Hannah Gaines; Claudio Gratton; Katherine L Gross; Heidi Liere; Carolyn M Malmstrom; Timothy D Meehan; Leilei Ruan; Bruce A Robertson; G Philip Robertson; Thomas M Schmidt; Abbie C Schrotenboer; Tracy K Teal; Julianna K Wilson; Douglas A Landis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-01-13       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Ionic Liquids Impact the Bioenergy Feedstock-Degrading Microbiome and Transcription of Enzymes Relevant to Polysaccharide Hydrolysis.

Authors:  Yu-Wei Wu; Brendan Higgins; Chaowei Yu; Amitha P Reddy; Shannon Ceballos; Lawrence D Joh; Blake A Simmons; Steven W Singer; Jean S VanderGheynst
Journal:  mSystems       Date:  2016-12-13       Impact factor: 6.496

6.  Mapping LULC types in the Cerrado-Atlantic Forest ecotone region using a Landsat time series and object-based image approach: A case study of the Prata River Basin, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil.

Authors:  Elias Rodrigues da Cunha; Celso Augusto Guimarães Santos; Richarde Marques da Silva; Vitor Matheus Bacani; Paulo Eduardo Teodoro; Elói Panachuki; Naelmo de Souza Oliveira
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 2.513

7.  Carbon storage potential increases with increasing ratio of C4 to C3 grass cover and soil productivity in restored tallgrass prairies.

Authors:  Brian J Spiesman; Herika Kummel; Randall D Jackson
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  The copper active site of CBM33 polysaccharide oxygenases.

Authors:  Glyn R Hemsworth; Edward J Taylor; Robbert Q Kim; Rebecca C Gregory; Sally J Lewis; Johan P Turkenburg; Alison Parkin; Gideon J Davies; Paul H Walton
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 15.419

9.  Towards a carbon-negative sustainable bio-based economy.

Authors:  Bartel Vanholme; Tom Desmet; Frederik Ronsse; Korneel Rabaey; Frank Van Breusegem; Marjan De Mey; Wim Soetaert; Wout Boerjan
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2013-06-03       Impact factor: 5.753

10.  Hydrophobic amino acids as a new class of kinetic inhibitors for gas hydrate formation.

Authors:  Jeong-Hoon Sa; Gye-Hoon Kwak; Bo Ram Lee; Da-Hye Park; Kunwoo Han; Kun-Hong Lee
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.