Literature DB >> 23334252

Association of race and socioeconomic status and outcomes of patients with rectal cancer.

James R Nitzkorski1, Alliric I Willis, Donna Nick, Fang Zhu, Jeffrey M Farma, Elin R Sigurdson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Few studies have evaluated disparities of race and socioeconomic status (SES) with outcomes in patients with rectal cancer. We hypothesize that disparities exist in the treatment and outcomes among patients with rectal cancer.
METHODS: Medical records of all patients with rectal cancer treated from 2000 to 2009 at an NCI cancer center (Fox Chase Cancer Center) and an urban academic center (Temple University Hospital) were retrospectively reviewed from a prospectively maintained tumor registry database. SES was estimated using census data. Quartiles of income and education based on zip codes were calculated. Lowest vs other quartiles were compared. Clinicopathologic variables included: initial stage, chemotherapy refusal, sphincter preservation, and overall survival (OS).
RESULTS: A total of 748 patients were included in the analysis (581 white, 135 black, 6 other, 26 unknown). No difference in race, SES, or insurance status was seen with regard to stage at presentation. Chemotherapy and radiation refusal was rare. After excluding stage IV patients; sphincter preservation was more common among those with higher income. Median OS for all stages was worse for nonwhite patients (31 vs 50 months, p < .001), and those with low income and education. OS disparities were most pronounced among nonwhite patients with advanced disease. Insurance was not associated with a survival difference. Age, stage, and race were independent predictors of survival.
CONCLUSIONS: Disparity exists in outcomes of patients with rectal cancer. Nonwhite race is associated with worse OS, and lower SES is associated with lower OS and sphincter preservation among patients with rectal cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23334252     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-012-2837-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  9 in total

1.  Population-Level Differences in Rectal Cancer Survival in Uninsured Patients Are Partially Explained by Differences in Treatment.

Authors:  Dianne Pulte; Lina Jansen; Hermann Brenner
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2017-02-20

2.  Transanal excision with adjuvant therapy for pT1N0 rectal tumors with high-risk features offers equivalent survival to radical resection: A National Cancer Database analysis.

Authors:  Katherine A Hrebinko; Katherine M Reitz; Maryam K Mohammed; Ibrahim Nassour; Andrew R Watson; Kellie E Cunningham; David S Medich; James P Celebrezze; Jennifer M Holder-Murray
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-10-27       Impact factor: 3.454

3.  A statewide program providing colorectal cancer screening to the uninsured of South Carolina.

Authors:  Jan M Eberth; Annie Thibault; Renay Caldwell; Michele J Josey; Beidi Qiang; Edsel Peña; Delecia LaFrance; Franklin G Berger
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  The impacts of surgery of the primary cancer and radiotherapy on the survival of patients with metastatic rectal cancer.

Authors:  Duo Tong; Fei Liu; Wenhua Li; Wen Zhang
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-07-11

Review 5.  A narrative review of sociodemographic risk and disparities in screening, diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes of the most common extrathoracic malignancies in the United States.

Authors:  Sarah Singh; Praveen Sridhar
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  Differences in the Survival of Gastric Cancer Patients after Gastrectomy according to the Medical Insurance Status.

Authors:  Jae Seong Jang; Dong Gue Shin; Hye Min Cho; Yujin Kwon; Dong Hui Cho; Kyung Bok Lee; Sang Soo Park; Jin Yoon; Yong Seog Jang; Il Myung Kim
Journal:  J Gastric Cancer       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 3.720

7.  Pharmacogenomically actionable medications in a safety net health care system.

Authors:  Janet S Carpenter; Marc B Rosenman; Mitchell R Knisely; Brian S Decker; Kenneth D Levy; David A Flockhart
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2016-01-07

8.  Disadvantage of survival outcomes in widowed patients with colorectal neuroendocrine neoplasm: an analysis of surveillance, epidemiology and end results database.

Authors:  Jing Li; Ying Wang; Fang Han; Zhu Wang; Lichun Xu; Jiandong Tong
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-12-13

9.  [Influence of socio-economic factors and education level on colorectal cancer in the Moroccan population].

Authors:  Fatima Ezzahra Imad; Houda Drissi; Nezha Tawfiq; Karima Bendahhou; Nadia Tahiri Jouti; Abdellatif Benider; Driss Radallah
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2019-12-23
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.