Literature DB >> 34705273

Transanal excision with adjuvant therapy for pT1N0 rectal tumors with high-risk features offers equivalent survival to radical resection: A National Cancer Database analysis.

Katherine A Hrebinko1, Katherine M Reitz1, Maryam K Mohammed1, Ibrahim Nassour2, Andrew R Watson3, Kellie E Cunningham3, David S Medich3, James P Celebrezze3, Jennifer M Holder-Murray3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines favor transabdominal radical resection (RR) over transanal local excision (TAX) followed by adjuvant therapy (TAXa) for pT1N0 rectal tumors with high-risk features. Comparison of oncologic outcomes between these approaches is limited, although the former is associated with increased postoperative morbidity. We hypothesize that such treatment strategies result in equivalent long-term survival.
METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the National Cancer Database (2010-2016) to identify patients with pT1N0 rectal adenocarcinoma with high-risk features who underwent TAX or RR for curative intent. The primary outcome was 5-year overall survival (OS), evaluated with log-rank and Cox-proportional hazards testing.
RESULTS: A total of 1159 patients (age 67.4 ± 12.9 years; 56.6% male; 83.3% White) met study criteria, of which 1009 (87.1%) underwent RR and 150 (12.9%) underwent TAXa. Patients undergoing TAXa had shorter lengths of stay (RR = 6.5 days, TAXa = 2.7 days, p < 0.001). The 5-year OS was equivalent between groups. TAX without adjuvant therapy was associated with an increased risk of mortality (hazard ratio 1.81, 95% confidence interval 1.17-2.78, p = 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest study to demonstrate equivalent 5-year OS between TAXa and RR for T1N0 rectal cancer with high-risk features. These findings may guide the development of prospective, randomized trials and influence changes in practice recommendations for early-stage rectal cancer.
© 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adenocarcinoma; digestive system surgical procedures; morbidity; rectal neoplasms

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34705273      PMCID: PMC8961452          DOI: 10.1002/jso.26734

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0022-4790            Impact factor:   3.454


  31 in total

1.  Prognostic significance of the circumferential resection margin following total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.

Authors:  A Wibe; P R Rendedal; E Svensson; J Norstein; T J Eide; H E Myrvold; O Søreide
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Radiotherapy does not compensate for positive resection margins in rectal cancer patients: report of a multicenter randomized trial.

Authors:  C A M Marijnen; I D Nagtegaal; E Kapiteijn; E Klein Kranenbarg; E M Noordijk; J H J M van Krieken; C J H van de Velde; J W H Leer
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2003-04-01       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  The results of local excision with or without postoperative adjuvant chemoradiotherapy for early rectal cancer among patients choosing to avoid radical surgery.

Authors:  S Balyasnikova; J Read; D Tait; A Wotherspoon; I Swift; D Cunningham; P Tekkis; G Brown
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 3.788

Review 4.  Meta-analysis of oncological outcomes after local excision of pT1-2 rectal cancer requiring adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy or completion surgery.

Authors:  W A A Borstlap; T J Coeymans; P J Tanis; C A M Marijnen; C Cunningham; W A Bemelman; J B Tuynman
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation.

Authors:  M E Charlson; P Pompei; K L Ales; C R MacKenzie
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

6.  Effects of positive resection margin and tumor distance from anus on rectal cancer treatment outcomes.

Authors:  P Terry Phang; John K MacFarlane; Robert H Taylor; Rona E Cheifetz; Noelle Davis; John H Hay; Greg McGregor; Caroline Speers; Barry J Sullivan; Janet Pitts; Andrew J Coldman
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  Pushing the envelope beyond a centimeter in rectal cancer: oncologic implications of close, but negative margins.

Authors:  Timothy L Fitzgerald; Jason Brinkley; Emmanuel E Zervos
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 6.113

8.  Long-term survival after transanal excision of T1 rectal cancer.

Authors:  Garrett M Nash; Martin R Weiser; José G Guillem; Larissa K Temple; Jinru Shia; Mithat Gonen; W Douglas Wong; Philip B Paty
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 4.585

9.  A predictive model for local recurrence after transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal cancer.

Authors:  S P Bach; J Hill; J R T Monson; J N L Simson; L Lane; A Merrie; B Warren; N J McC Mortensen
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Risk factors for occult lymph node metastasis of colorectal cancer invading the submucosa and indications for endoscopic mucosal resection.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Yasuda; Masafumi Inomata; Akio Shiromizu; Norio Shiraishi; Hidefumi Higashi; Seigo Kitano
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 4.585

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.