Literature DB >> 23333947

Quantitative dynamics and increased variability of segmentation gene expression in the Drosophila Krüppel and knirps mutants.

Svetlana Surkova1, Elena Golubkova, Lena Panok, Lyudmila Mamon, John Reinitz, Maria Samsonova.   

Abstract

Here we characterize the response of the Drosophila segmentation system to mutations in two gap genes, Kr and kni, in the form of single or double homozygotes and single heterozygotes. Segmentation gene expression in these genotypes was quantitatively monitored with cellular resolution in space and 6.5 to 13min resolution in time. As is the case with wild type, we found that gene expression domains in the posterior portion of the embryo shift to the anterior over time. In certain cases, such as the gt posterior domain in Kr mutants, the shifts are significantly larger than is seen in wild type embryos. We also investigated the effects of Kr and kni on the variability of gene expression. Mutations often produce variable phenotypes, and it is well known that the cuticular phenotype of Kr mutants is variable. We sought to understand the molecular basis of this effect. We find that throughout cycle 14A the relative levels of eve and ftz expression in stripes 2 and 3 are variable among individual embryos. Moreover, in Kr and kni mutants, unlike wild type, the variability in positioning of the posterior Hb domain and eve stripe 7 is not decreased or filtered with time. The posterior Gt domain in Kr mutants is highly variable at early times, but this variability decreases when this domain shifts in the anterior direction to the position of the neighboring Kni domain. In contrast to these findings, positional variability throughout the embryo does not decrease over time in double Kr;kni mutants. In heterozygotes the early expression patterns of segmentation genes resemble patterns seen in homozygous mutants but by the onset of gastrulation they become similar to the wild type patterns. Finally, we note that gene expression levels are reduced in Kr and kni mutant embryos and have a tendency to decrease over time. This is a surprising result in view of the role that mutual repression is thought to play in the gap gene system.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23333947     DOI: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2013.01.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Biol        ISSN: 0012-1606            Impact factor:   3.582


  21 in total

1.  Quantitative analysis reveals genotype- and domain- specific differences between mRNA and protein expression of segmentation genes in Drosophila.

Authors:  Svetlana Surkova; Alena Sokolkova; Konstantin Kozlov; Sergey V Nuzhdin; Maria Samsonova
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 3.582

Review 2.  Pervasive robustness in biological systems.

Authors:  Marie-Anne Félix; Michalis Barkoulas
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 3.  Noise in biology.

Authors:  Lev S Tsimring
Journal:  Rep Prog Phys       Date:  2014-01-20

4.  Natural variation of the expression pattern of the segmentation gene even-skipped in melanogaster.

Authors:  Pengyao Jiang; Michael Z Ludwig; Martin Kreitman; John Reinitz
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2015-06-27       Impact factor: 3.582

5.  In silico evolution of the hunchback gene indicates redundancy in cis-regulatory organization and spatial gene expression.

Authors:  Elizaveta A Zagrijchuk; Marat A Sabirov; David M Holloway; Alexander V Spirov
Journal:  J Bioinform Comput Biol       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 1.122

Review 6.  The embryo as a laboratory: quantifying transcription in Drosophila.

Authors:  Thomas Gregor; Hernan G Garcia; Shawn C Little
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2014-07-06       Impact factor: 11.639

7.  Maternal co-ordinate gene regulation and axis polarity in the scuttle fly Megaselia abdita.

Authors:  Karl R Wotton; Eva Jiménez-Guri; Johannes Jaeger
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 5.917

8.  Mechanistic explanations for restricted evolutionary paths that emerge from gene regulatory networks.

Authors:  James Cotterell; James Sharpe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Uncovering a dynamic feature of the transcriptional regulatory network for anterior-posterior patterning in the Drosophila embryo.

Authors:  Junbo Liu; Jun Ma
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Lack of tailless leads to an increase in expression variability in Drosophila embryos.

Authors:  Hilde Janssens; Anton Crombach; Karl Richard Wotton; Damjan Cicin-Sain; Svetlana Surkova; Chea Lu Lim; Maria Samsonova; Michael Akam; Johannes Jaeger
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 3.582

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.