Literature DB >> 23333721

Randomized trial of pacemaker and lead system for safe scanning at 1.5 Tesla.

J Rod Gimbel1, David Bello, Matthias Schmitt, Béla Merkely, Juerg Schwitter, David L Hayes, Torsten Sommer, Edward J Schloss, Yanping Chang, Sarah Willey, Emanuel Kanal.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of pacemakers is a relative contraindication because of the risks to the patient from potentially hazardous interactions between the MRI and the pacemaker system. Chest scans (ie, cardiac magnetic resonance scans) are of particular importance and higher risk. The previously Food and Drug Administration-approved magnetic resonance conditional system includes positioning restrictions, limiting the powerful utility of MRI.
OBJECTIVE: To confirm the safety and effectiveness of a pacemaker system designed for safe whole body MRI without MRI scan positioning restrictions.
METHODS: Primary eligibility criteria included standard dual-chamber pacing indications. Patients (n = 263) were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to undergo 16 chest and head scans at 1.5 T between 9 and 12 weeks postimplant (n = 177) or to not undergo MRI (n = 86) post-implant. Evaluation of the pacemaker system occurred immediately before, during (monitoring), and after MRI, 1-week post-MRI, and 1-month post-MRI, and similarly for controls. Primary end points measured the MRI-related complication-free rate for safety and compared pacing capture threshold between MRI and control subjects for effectiveness.
RESULTS: There were no MRI-related complications during or after MRI in subjects undergoing MRI (n = 148). Differences in pacing capture threshold values from pre-MRI to 1-month post-MRI were minimal and similar between the MRI and control groups.
CONCLUSIONS: This randomized trial demonstrates that the Advisa MRI pulse generator and CapSureFix MRI 5086MRI lead system is safe and effective in the 1.5 T MRI environment without positioning restrictions for MRI scans or limitations of body parts scanned.
Copyright © 2013 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23333721     DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2013.01.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Rhythm        ISSN: 1547-5271            Impact factor:   6.343


  21 in total

1.  Clinical value of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients with MR-conditional pacemakers.

Authors:  Claire E Raphael; Vassilis Vassiliou; Francisco Alpendurada; Sanjay K Prasad; Dudley J Pennell; Raad H Mohiaddin
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-11-20       Impact factor: 6.875

2.  An eight-year prospective controlled study about the safety and diagnostic value of cardiac and non-cardiac 1.5-T MRI in patients with a conventional pacemaker or a conventional implantable cardioverter defibrillator.

Authors:  Pierpaolo Lupo; Riccardo Cappato; Giovanni Di Leo; Francesco Secchi; Giacomo D E Papini; Sara Foresti; Hussam Ali; Guido M G De Ambroggi; Antonio Sorgente; Gianluca Epicoco; Paola M Cannaò; Francesco Sardanelli
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Safety of implanted cardiac devices in an MRI environment.

Authors:  Esra Gucuk Ipek; Saman Nazarian
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 2.931

4.  Computed tomography continues to be the preferred tomographic imaging technology for patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices despite a potential risk of electrical interference by irradiation.

Authors:  Takumi Yamada
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 5.952

5.  Safety of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Cardiac Devices.

Authors:  Saman Nazarian; Rozann Hansford; Amir A Rahsepar; Valeria Weltin; Diana McVeigh; Esra Gucuk Ipek; Alan Kwan; Ronald D Berger; Hugh Calkins; Albert C Lardo; Michael A Kraut; Ihab R Kamel; Stefan L Zimmerman; Henry R Halperin
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 6.  MRI for patients with cardiac implantable electrical devices.

Authors:  Grant V Chow; Saman Nazarian
Journal:  Cardiol Clin       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 2.213

7.  [Pacemaker and MRI in clinical practice].

Authors:  A Fendt; M Strauß; K Kouraki; R Zahn; T Kleemann
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 1.443

Review 8.  Safety of MRIs in patients with pacemakers and defibrillators.

Authors:  Santhisri Kodali; Alex Baher; Dipan Shah
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2013 Jul-Sep

9.  Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with a subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator.

Authors:  Jirí Keller; Petr Neužil; Josef Vymazal; Marek Janotka; Jirí Brada; Radovan Žáček; Roman Vopálka; Jirí Weichet; Vivek Y Reddy
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2015-02-16       Impact factor: 5.214

10.  Feasibility and safety of adenosine cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients with MR conditional pacemaker systems at 1.5 Tesla.

Authors:  Oliver Klein-Wiele; Marietta Garmer; Rhyan Urbien; Martin Busch; Kaffer Kara; Serban Mateiescu; Dietrich Grönemeyer; Michael Schulte-Hermes; Marc Garbrecht; Birgit Hailer
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 5.364

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.