Literature DB >> 24793805

MRI for patients with cardiac implantable electrical devices.

Grant V Chow1, Saman Nazarian2.   

Abstract

MRI has become an invaluable tool in the evaluation of soft tissue and bony abnormalities. The presence of a cardiac implantable electrical device (CIED) may complicate matters, however, because these devices are considered a contraindication to MRI scanning. When MRI is performed in patients with a CIED, risks include reed switch activation in older devices, lead heating, system malfunction, and significant radiofrequency noise resulting in inappropriate inhibition of demand pacing, tachycardia therapies, or programming changes. This report reviews indications and risk-benefit evaluation of MRI in patients with CIED and provides a clinical algorithm for performing MRI in patients with implanted devices.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiac implantable electrical device; Defibrillator; MRI; Pacemaker

Mesh：

Year:  2014        PMID： 24793805      PMCID： PMC4010944          DOI： 10.1016/j.ccl.2013.12.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiol Clin        ISSN： 0733-8651            Impact factor:   2.213


  21 in total

1.  MR imaging and cardiac pacemakers: in-vitro evaluation and in-vivo studies in 51 patients at 0.5 T.

Authors:  T Sommer; C Vahlhaus; G Lauck; A von Smekal; M Reinke; U Hofer; W Block; F Träber; C Schneider; J Gieseke; W Jung; H Schild
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Modern pacemaker and implantable cardioverter/defibrillator systems can be magnetic resonance imaging safe: in vitro and in vivo assessment of safety and function at 1.5 T.

Authors:  Ariel Roguin; Menekhem M Zviman; Glenn R Meininger; E Rene Rodrigues; Timm M Dickfeld; David A Bluemke; Albert Lardo; Ronald D Berger; Hugh Calkins; Henry R Halperin
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2004-07-26       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Heating of pacemaker leads during magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Christian Vahlhaus
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2005-05-04       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 4.  Clinical applications of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Constantin B Marcu; Aernout M Beek; Albert C van Rossum
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2006-10-10       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Safe performance of magnetic resonance imaging on five patients with permanent cardiac pacemakers.

Authors:  J R Gimbel; D Johnson; P A Levine; B L Wilkoff
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 1.976

6.  Clinical utility and safety of a protocol for noncardiac and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging of patients with permanent pacemakers and implantable-cardioverter defibrillators at 1.5 tesla.

Authors:  Saman Nazarian; Ariel Roguin; Menekhem M Zviman; Albert C Lardo; Timm L Dickfeld; Hugh Calkins; Robert G Weiss; Ronald D Berger; David A Bluemke; Henry R Halperin
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-09-11       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Strategy for safe performance of extrathoracic magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 tesla in the presence of cardiac pacemakers in non-pacemaker-dependent patients: a prospective study with 115 examinations.

Authors:  Torsten Sommer; Claas P Naehle; Alexander Yang; Volkert Zeijlemaker; Matthias Hackenbroch; Alexandra Schmiedel; Carsten Meyer; Katharina Strach; Dirk Skowasch; Christian Vahlhaus; Harold Litt; Hans Schild
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-09-11       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 8.  Current clinical issues for MRI scanning of pacemaker and defibrillator patients.

Authors:  Ron Kalin; Marshall S Stanton
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 1.976

9.  Magnetic resonance imaging and cardiac pacemaker safety at 1.5-Tesla.

Authors:  Edward T Martin; James A Coman; Frank G Shellock; Christopher C Pulling; Robert Fair; Kim Jenkins
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2004-04-07       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  Safety of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiovascular devices: an American Heart Association scientific statement from the Committee on Diagnostic and Interventional Cardiac Catheterization, Council on Clinical Cardiology, and the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention: endorsed by the American College of Cardiology Foundation, the North American Society for Cardiac Imaging, and the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

Authors:  Glenn N Levine; Antoinette S Gomes; Andrew E Arai; David A Bluemke; Scott D Flamm; Emanuel Kanal; Warren J Manning; Edward T Martin; J Michael Smith; Norbert Wilke; Frank S Shellock
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2007-11-19       Impact factor: 29.690
View more
  6 in total

1.  Provision of MR imaging for patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs): a single-center experience and national survey.

Authors:  Aoife S Murray; Paddy J Gilligan; James M Bisset; Chris Nolan; Joseph M Galvin; John G Murray
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2018-10-27       Impact factor: 1.568

2.  Automated Classification of Severity in Cardiac Dyssynchrony Merging Clinical Data and Mechanical Descriptors.

Authors:  Alejandro Santos-Díaz; Raquel Valdés-Cristerna; Enrique Vallejo; Salvador Hernández; Luis Jiménez-Ángeles
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2017-02-19       Impact factor: 2.238

3.  Utilization of Iodinated SpaceOAR Vue™ During Robotic Prostate Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) to Identify the Rectal-Prostate Interface and Spare the Rectum: A Case Report.

Authors:  Dylan Conroy; Kelly Becht; Matthew Forsthoefel; Abigail N Pepin; Siyuan Lei; Abdul Rashid; Brian Timothy Collins; Jonathan W Lischalk; Simeng Suy; Nima Aghdam; Ryan Andrew Hankins; Sean P Collins
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 4.  New Insights into MR Safety for Implantable Medical Devices.

Authors:  Kagayaki Kuroda; Satoshi Yatsushiro
Journal:  Magn Reson Med Sci       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 2.760

5.  Urethrogram-Directed Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer in Patients with Contraindications to Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Ima Paydar; Brian S Kim; Robyn A Cyr; Harriss Rashid; Amna Anjum; Thomas M Yung; Siyuan Lei; Brian T Collins; Simeng Suy; Anatoly Dritschilo; John H Lynch; Sean P Collins
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 6.  Cardiovascular implantable electronic devices: a review of the dangers and difficulties in MR scanning and attempts to improve safety.

Authors:  Pei Ghim Poh; Charlene Liew; Colin Yeo; Le Roy Chong; Andrew Tan; Angeline Poh
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2017-06-17
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.