Literature DB >> 23331871

The economic impact of anastomotic leakage after anterior resections in English NHS hospitals: are we adequately remunerating them?

S Q Ashraf1, E M Burns, A Jani, S Altman, J D Young, C Cunningham, O Faiz, N J Mortensen.   

Abstract

AIM: Our aim was to determine the frequency and economic impact of anastomotic leakage (AL) at local and national levels in England.
METHOD: All patients who underwent AR in Oxford between 2007 and 2009 were evaluated for AL. Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) data were used to determine reoperation rates after elective AR (n = 23 388) in England between 2000 and 2008. Hospital episode remuneration costs were calculated by the local commissioning department and compared with Department of Health (DH) reference index costs.
RESULTS: The frequency of AL following anterior resection was 10.9% (31 out of 285) in Oxford. Laparotomy for leakage was performed in 5.6% of cases. The 30-day hospital mortality rate for all ARs was 2.1%, compared with 3.2% after AL. The national relaparotomy rate (within 28 days) and 30-day hospital mortality in English National Health Service (NHS) trusts following AR were 5.9% and 2.9%, respectively. Institutional remunerated tariffs (£6233 (SD ± 965)) were similar to DH reference costs (£6319 (SD ± 1830)) after uncomplicated AR. However, there was a significant (P = 0.008) discrepancy between the remunerated tariff for AL (£9605 (SD ± 6908)) and the actual cost (£17 220 (SD ± 9642)). AL resulted in an additional annual cost of approximately £1.1 million to £3.5 million when extrapolated nationally.
CONCLUSION: The estimated economic burden of anastomotic leakage following AR is approximately double that of the remunerated tariff.
© 2013 The Authors. Colorectal Disease © 2013 The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23331871     DOI: 10.1111/codi.12125

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 1462-8910            Impact factor:   3.788


  33 in total

Review 1.  Staple line/anastomotic reinforcement and other adjuncts: do they make a difference?

Authors:  Richard Betzold; Jonathan A Laryea
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2014-12

Review 2.  Fluorescence imaging in colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Trevor M Yeung
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-05-08       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Assessment of intraoperative use of indocyanine green fluorescence imaging on the incidence of anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery: a PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  M Song; J Liu; D Xia; H Yao; G Tian; X Chen; Y Liu; Y Jiang; Z Li
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2020-09-03       Impact factor: 3.781

4.  Endoscopic vacuum-assisted surgical closure (EVASC) of anastomotic defects after low anterior resection for rectal cancer; lessons learned.

Authors:  Kevin Talboom; Nynke G Greijdanus; Cyriel Y Ponsioen; Pieter J Tanis; Wilhelmus A Bemelman; Roel Hompes
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Impact of tutorial assistance in laparoscopic sigmoidectomy for acute recurrent diverticulitis.

Authors:  Henry Hoffmann; Salome Dell-Kuster; Jörg Genstorfer; Oleg Heizmann; Christoph Kettelhack; Igor Langer; Daniel Oertli; Rachel Rosenthal
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 2.549

6.  Double-layered Nanofibrous Patch for Prevention of Anastomotic Leakage and Peritoneal Adhesions, Experimental Study.

Authors:  Jachym Rosendorf; Marketa Klicova; Lenka Cervenkova; Richard Palek; Jana Horakova; Andrea Klapstova; Petr Hosek; Vladimira Moulisova; Lukas Bednar; Vaclav Tegl; Ondrej Brzon; Zbynek Tonar; Vladislav Treska; David Lukas; Vaclav Liska
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2021 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.155

Review 7.  Multidisciplinary management of elderly patients with rectal cancer: recommendations from the SICG (Italian Society of Geriatric Surgery), SIFIPAC (Italian Society of Surgical Pathophysiology), SICE (Italian Society of Endoscopic Surgery and new technologies), and the WSES (World Society of Emergency Surgery) International Consensus Project.

Authors:  Mauro Podda; Patricia Sylla; Gianluca Baiocchi; Michel Adamina; Vanni Agnoletti; Ferdinando Agresta; Luca Ansaloni; Alberto Arezzo; Nicola Avenia; Walter Biffl; Antonio Biondi; Simona Bui; Fabio C Campanile; Paolo Carcoforo; Claudia Commisso; Antonio Crucitti; Nicola De'Angelis; Gian Luigi De'Angelis; Massimo De Filippo; Belinda De Simone; Salomone Di Saverio; Giorgio Ercolani; Gustavo P Fraga; Francesco Gabrielli; Federica Gaiani; Mario Guerrieri; Angelo Guttadauro; Yoram Kluger; Ari K Leppaniemi; Andrea Loffredo; Tiziana Meschi; Ernest E Moore; Monica Ortenzi; Francesco Pata; Dario Parini; Adolfo Pisanu; Gilberto Poggioli; Andrea Polistena; Alessandro Puzziello; Fabio Rondelli; Massimo Sartelli; Neil Smart; Michael E Sugrue; Patricia Tejedor; Marco Vacante; Federico Coccolini; Justin Davies; Fausto Catena
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 8.  Gut microbiome influences on anastomotic leak and recurrence rates following colorectal cancer surgery.

Authors:  S Gaines; C Shao; N Hyman; J C Alverdy
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  [Evidence of indocyanine green fluorescence in robotically assisted colorectal surgery : What is the status?]

Authors:  T O Vilz; J C Kalff; B Stoffels
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 10.  Predictive and Diagnostic Biomarkers of Anastomotic Leakage: A Precision Medicine Approach for Colorectal Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Mark Gray; Jamie R K Marland; Alan F Murray; David J Argyle; Mark A Potter
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2021-05-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.