Literature DB >> 23328662

Diagnosis of glaucoma and detection of glaucoma progression using spectral domain optical coherence tomography.

Dilraj S Grewal1, Angelo P Tanna.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: With the rapid adoption of spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SDOCT) in clinical practice and the recent advances in software technology, there is a need for a review of the literature on glaucoma detection and progression analysis algorithms designed for the commercially available instruments. RECENT
FINDINGS: Peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness and macular thickness, including segmental macular thickness calculation algorithms, have been demonstrated to be repeatable and reproducible, and have a high degree of diagnostic sensitivity and specificity in discriminating between healthy and glaucomatous eyes across the glaucoma continuum. Newer software capabilities such as glaucoma progression detection algorithms provide an objective analysis of longitudinally obtained structural data that enhances our ability to detect glaucomatous progression. RNFL measurements obtained with SDOCT appear more sensitive than time domain OCT (TDOCT) for glaucoma progression detection; however, agreement with the assessments of visual field progression is poor.
SUMMARY: Over the last few years, several studies have been performed to assess the diagnostic performance of SDOCT structural imaging and its validity in assessing glaucoma progression. Most evidence suggests that SDOCT performs similarly to TDOCT for glaucoma diagnosis; however, SDOCT may be superior for the detection of early stage disease. With respect to progression detection, SDOCT represents an important technological advance because of its improved resolution and repeatability. Advancements in RNFL thickness quantification, segmental macular thickness calculation and progression detection algorithms, when used correctly, may help to improve our ability to diagnose and manage glaucoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23328662     DOI: 10.1097/ICU.0b013e32835d9e27

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol        ISSN: 1040-8738            Impact factor:   3.761


  48 in total

1.  [Structural diagnostics of course observation for glaucoma].

Authors:  C Y Mardin
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  The Management of Glaucoma: Structure and Function.

Authors:  Kazuyuki Hirooka; Tomomi Higashide; Jin Wook Jeoung
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-04-22       Impact factor: 1.909

Review 3.  [Functional disorders in the chronological progression of glaucoma].

Authors:  Carl Erb
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.059

4.  Diagnostic capability of peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer parameters in time-domain versus spectral-domain optical coherence tomography for assessing glaucoma in high myopia.

Authors:  Mei-Ching Teng; Yi-Chieh Poon; Kuo-Chi Hung; Hsueh-Wen Chang; Ing-Chou Lai; Jen-Chia Tsai; Pei-Wen Lin; Chien-Yun Wu; Chueh-Tan Chen; Pei-Chang Wu
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 1.779

5.  Patterns of glaucoma progression in retinal nerve fiber and macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer in spectral-domain optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Hae Jin Kim; Jin Wook Jeoung; Byeong Wook Yoo; Hee Chan Kim; Ki Ho Park
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 2.447

6.  PANRETINAL PHOTOCOAGULATION VERSUS RANIBIZUMAB FOR PROLIFERATIVE DIABETIC RETINOPATHY: Comparison of Peripapillary Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness in a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Lee M Jampol; Isoken Odia; Adam R Glassman; Carl W Baker; Anjali M Bhorade; Dennis P Han; Glenn J Jaffe; Michele Melia; Neil M Bressler; Angelo P Tanna
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 4.256

7.  Improving glaucoma detection using spatially correspondent clusters of damage and by combining standard automated perimetry and optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Ali S Raza; Xian Zhang; Carlos G V De Moraes; Charles A Reisman; Jeffrey M Liebmann; Robert Ritch; Donald C Hood
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Epiretinal membrane as a source of errors during the measurement of peripapillary nerve fibre thickness using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT).

Authors:  Florian Rüfer; Julia Jasmin Bartsch; Carl Erb; Anneliese Riehl; Philipp Franko Zeitz
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-08-27       Impact factor: 3.117

9.  The ISNT Rule: How Often Does It Apply to Disc Photographs and Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Measurements in the Normal Population?

Authors:  Linda Yi-Chieh Poon; David Solá-Del Valle; Angela V Turalba; Iryna A Falkenstein; Michael Horsley; Julie H Kim; Brian J Song; Hana L Takusagawa; Kaidi Wang; Teresa C Chen
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-09-23       Impact factor: 5.258

10.  Determinants of peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness regarding ocular and systemic parameters - the MIPH Eye&Health Study.

Authors:  Alexander Karl-Georg Schuster; Joachim Ernst Fischer; Christine Vossmerbaeumer; Urs Vossmerbaeumer
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 3.117

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.