M E Wood1, B S Flynn, A Stockdale. 1. Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Family Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405, USA. Marie.Wood@uvm.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Risk stratification based on family history is a feature of screening guidelines for a number of cancers and referral guidelines for genetic counseling/testing for cancer risk. AIMS: Our aim was to describe primary care physician perceptions of their role in managing cancer risk based on family history. METHODS: Structured interviews were conducted by a medical anthropologist with primary care physicians in 3 settings in 2 north-eastern states. Transcripts were systematically analyzed by a research team to identify major themes expressed by participants. RESULTS: Forty interviews were conducted from May 2003 through May 2006. Physicians provided a diversity of views on roles in management of cancer risk based on family history, management practices and patient responses to risk information. They also provided a wide range of perspectives on criteria used for referral to specialists, types of specialists referred to and expected management roles for referred patients. CONCLUSION: Some primary care physicians appeared to make effective use of family history information for cancer risk management, but many in this sample did not. Increased focus on efficient assessment tools based on recognized guidelines, accessible guides to management options, and patient education and decision aids may be useful directions to facilitate broader use of family history information for cancer risk management.
BACKGROUND: Risk stratification based on family history is a feature of screening guidelines for a number of cancers and referral guidelines for genetic counseling/testing for cancer risk. AIMS: Our aim was to describe primary care physician perceptions of their role in managing cancer risk based on family history. METHODS: Structured interviews were conducted by a medical anthropologist with primary care physicians in 3 settings in 2 north-eastern states. Transcripts were systematically analyzed by a research team to identify major themes expressed by participants. RESULTS: Forty interviews were conducted from May 2003 through May 2006. Physicians provided a diversity of views on roles in management of cancer risk based on family history, management practices and patient responses to risk information. They also provided a wide range of perspectives on criteria used for referral to specialists, types of specialists referred to and expected management roles for referred patients. CONCLUSION: Some primary care physicians appeared to make effective use of family history information for cancer risk management, but many in this sample did not. Increased focus on efficient assessment tools based on recognized guidelines, accessible guides to management options, and patient education and decision aids may be useful directions to facilitate broader use of family history information for cancer risk management.
Authors: Eugene C Rich; Wylie Burke; Caryl J Heaton; Susanne Haga; Linda Pinsky; M Priscilla Short; Louise Acheson Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Argyrios Ziogas; Nora K Horick; Anita Y Kinney; Jan T Lowery; Susan M Domchek; Claudine Isaacs; Constance A Griffin; Patricia G Moorman; Karen L Edwards; Deirdre A Hill; Jonathan S Berg; Gail E Tomlinson; Hoda Anton-Culver; Louise C Strong; Carol H Kasten; Dianne M Finkelstein; Sharon E Plon Journal: JAMA Date: 2011-07-13 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Suzanne M O'Neill; Wendy S Rubinstein; Catharine Wang; Paula W Yoon; Louise S Acheson; Nan Rothrock; Erin J Starzyk; Jennifer L Beaumont; James M Galliher; Mack T Ruffin Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2009-06 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Paula W Yoon; Maren T Scheuner; Kris L Peterson-Oehlke; Marta Gwinn; Andrew Faucett; Muin J Khoury Journal: Genet Med Date: 2002 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 8.822
Authors: Lauren Puryear; Natalie Downs; Andrea Nevedal; Eleanor T Lewis; Kelly E Ormond; Maria Bregendahl; Carlos J Suarez; Sean P David; Steven Charlap; Isabella Chu; Steven M Asch; Neda Pakdaman; Sang-Ick Chang; Mark R Cullen; Latha Palaniappan Journal: J Community Genet Date: 2017-12-27
Authors: Jada G Hamilton; Ekland Abdiwahab; Heather M Edwards; Min-Lin Fang; Andrew Jdayani; Erica S Breslau Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2016-12-19 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Laura-Mae Baldwin; Katrina F Trivers; C Holly A Andrilla; Barbara Matthews; Jacqueline W Miller; Denise M Lishner; Barbara A Goff Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2014-02-12 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Marie E Wood; Pamela Kadlubek; Trang H Pham; Dana S Wollins; Karen H Lu; Jeffrey N Weitzel; Michael N Neuss; Kevin S Hughes Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2014-02-03 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Jessica E Ebrahimzadeh; Jessica M Long; Louise Wang; John T Nathanson; Shazia Mehmood Siddique; Anil K Rustgi; David S Goldberg; Bryson W Katona Journal: J Genet Couns Date: 2020-03-30 Impact factor: 2.537