Literature DB >> 16951296

Cancer risk assessment: examining the family physician's role.

Carl V Tyler1, Clint W Snyder.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cancer risk assessment begins in the primary care clinician's office. Essential components of that process include: 1) documentation of personal and family cancer information; 2) identification of families at increased risk for cancer; 3) modification of cancer screening recommendations according to degree of risk; 4) referral of high-risk individuals to cancer genetics clinics. The purpose of this study was to examine these 4 components of primary care cancer risk assessment using data abstracted from patient records at an academic family medicine center.
METHODS: Ambulatory records of 734 patients were reviewed in their entirety for information relevant to cancer risk assessment. Detail of cancer information was categorized as comprehensive, adequate, or inadequate. Patient records were categorized as suggestive of average, moderate, or high genetic risk for cancer. For patients with a family history of colorectal cancer, modification of colon cancer screening to reflect degree of cancer risk was assessed. Finally, the frequency of cancer genetic referral in high-risk individuals was noted.
RESULTS: The presence or absence of a family history of cancer was documented in 97.8% of records. There was insufficient information to adequately assess risk in 69.5% of charts. Detail of family cancer documentation was associated with personal history of cancer (P = .001), patient age (P = .001), and physician training status (P = .042), but not with patient or physician gender, duration of care, or completion of a genogram. For persons with a family history of colorectal cancer, compliance with cancer screening individualized to degree of risk was achieved in 50% of patients. Ten patients met criteria for moderate or high genetic risk for cancer. None had been offered cancer genetics consultation.
CONCLUSIONS: Nearly all records documented the presence or absence of a family history of cancer. However, in those with a positive family history, the detail of information was insufficient to permit risk assessment in over two thirds of individuals; risk-stratified colon cancer screening was not achieved in half of the patients with a family history of colorectal cancer; individuals at moderate or high cancer risk were not identified as such; and those at high risk were not offered cancer genetics referral. In addition to collecting adequate family cancer information, family physicians need to adopt explicit risk assessment criteria to identify, and to optimally care for, those at increased genetic risk for cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16951296     DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.19.5.468

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med        ISSN: 1557-2625            Impact factor:   2.657


  25 in total

1.  Clinically relevant changes in family history of cancer over time.

Authors:  Argyrios Ziogas; Nora K Horick; Anita Y Kinney; Jan T Lowery; Susan M Domchek; Claudine Isaacs; Constance A Griffin; Patricia G Moorman; Karen L Edwards; Deirdre A Hill; Jonathan S Berg; Gail E Tomlinson; Hoda Anton-Culver; Louise C Strong; Carol H Kasten; Dianne M Finkelstein; Sharon E Plon
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  A randomized trial to increase colonoscopy screening in members of high-risk families in the colorectal cancer family registry and cancer genetics network.

Authors:  Jan T Lowery; Nora Horick; Anita Y Kinney; Dianne M Finkelstein; Kathleen Garrett; Robert W Haile; Noralane M Lindor; Polly A Newcomb; Robert S Sandler; Carol Burke; Deirdre A Hill; Dennis J Ahnen
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 3.  Review and Comparison of Electronic Patient-Facing Family Health History Tools.

Authors:  Brandon M Welch; Kevin Wiley; Lance Pflieger; Rosaline Achiangia; Karen Baker; Chanita Hughes-Halbert; Heath Morrison; Joshua Schiffman; Megan Doerr
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Automatic Genetic Risk Assessment Calculation Using Breast Cancer Family History Data from the EHR compared to Self-Report.

Authors:  Margaret Sin; Julia E McGuinness; Meghna S Trivedi; Alejandro Vanegas; Thomas B Silverman; Katherine D Crew; Rita Kukafka
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2018-12-05

Review 5.  The evolution of colorectal cancer genetics-Part 1: from discovery to practice.

Authors:  Andrew T Schlussel; Ronald A Gagliano; Susan Seto-Donlon; Faye Eggerding; Timothy Donlon; Jeffrey Berenberg; Henry T Lynch
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2014-10

6.  Primary care physician management, referral, and relations with specialists concerning patients at risk for cancer due to family history.

Authors:  M E Wood; B S Flynn; A Stockdale
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 2.000

7.  "Would you test your children without their consent?" and other sticky dilemmas in the field of cancer genetic testing.

Authors:  Karina L Brierley; Danielle C Bonadies; Anne Moyer; Ellen T Matloff
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.375

8.  Family Physicians' Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Toward Colorectal Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Mustafa Kürşat Şahin; Servet Aker
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 2.037

9.  Primary care physicians' use of family history for cancer risk assessment.

Authors:  Brian S Flynn; Marie E Wood; Takamaru Ashikaga; Alan Stockdale; Greg S Dana; Shelly Naud
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2010-06-03       Impact factor: 2.497

10.  Primary care providers' responses to patient-generated family history.

Authors:  Melissa Fuller; Melanie Myers; Thomas Webb; Meredith Tabangin; Cynthia Prows
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2009-10-24       Impact factor: 2.537

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.