Literature DB >> 23325525

Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure for stroke prophylaxis in patients with atrial fibrillation: 2.3-Year Follow-up of the PROTECT AF (Watchman Left Atrial Appendage System for Embolic Protection in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation) Trial.

Vivek Y Reddy1, Shephal K Doshi, Horst Sievert, Maurice Buchbinder, Petr Neuzil, Kenneth Huber, Jonathan L Halperin, David Holmes.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The multicenter PROTECT AF study (Watchman Left Atrial Appendage System for Embolic Protection in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation) was conducted to determine whether percutaneous left atrial appendage closure with a filter device (Watchman) was noninferior to warfarin for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Patients (n=707) with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and at least 1 risk factor (age >75 years, hypertension, heart failure, diabetes, or prior stroke/transient ischemic attack) were randomized to either the Watchman device (n=463) or continued warfarin (n=244) in a 2:1 ratio. After device implantation, warfarin was continued for ≈45 days, followed by clopidogrel for 4.5 months and lifelong aspirin. Study discontinuation rates were 15.3% (71/463) and 22.5% (55/244) for the Watchman and warfarin groups, respectively. The time in therapeutic range for the warfarin group was 66%. The composite primary efficacy end point included stroke, systemic embolism, and cardiovascular death, and the primary analysis was by intention to treat. After 1588 patient-years of follow-up (mean 2.3±1.1 years), the primary efficacy event rates were 3.0% and 4.3% (percent per 100 patient-years) in the Watchman and warfarin groups, respectively (relative risk, 0.71; 95% confidence interval, 0.44%-1.30% per year), which met the criteria for noninferiority (probability of noninferiority >0.999). There were more primary safety events in the Watchman group (5.5% per year; 95% confidence interval, 4.2%-7.1% per year) than in the control group (3.6% per year; 95% confidence interval, 2.2%-5.3% per year; relative risk, 1.53; 95% confidence interval, 0.95-2.70).
CONCLUSIONS: The "local" strategy of left atrial appendage closure is noninferior to "systemic" anticoagulation with warfarin. PROTECT AF has, for the first time, implicated the left atrial appendage in the pathogenesis of stroke in atrial fibrillation. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: : URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00129545.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23325525     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.114389

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  149 in total

1.  [Atrial appendage occlusion in atrial fibrillation? Con].

Authors:  P D Schellinger; M Köhrmann
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.214

2.  Initial clinical experience using the EchoNavigator(®)-system during structural heart disease interventions.

Authors:  Jan Balzer; Tobias Zeus; Katharina Hellhammer; Verena Veulemans; Silke Eschenhagen; Eva Kehmeier; Christian Meyer; Tienush Rassaf; Malte Kelm
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2015-09-26

3.  Early Postoperative Outcome of Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Report from the Highest-Volume Center in Japan.

Authors:  Kishio Kuroda; Tomoko S Kato; Kenji Kuwaki; Kan Kajimoto; Seitetsu L Lee; Taira Yamamoto; Atsushi Amano
Journal:  Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 1.520

Review 4.  An overview of left atrial appendage occlusion devices.

Authors:  Kyle J Feldmann; Arash Arshi; Steven J Yakubov
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 5.  Almanac 2013: novel non-coronary cardiac interventions.

Authors:  Pascal Meier; Olaf Franzen; Alexandra J Lansky
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.704

6.  Compensatory caspase activation in MPP+-induced cell death in dopaminergic neurons.

Authors:  J L Y Chee; X L Guan; J Y Lee; B Dong; S M Leong; E H Ong; A K F Liou; T M Lim
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 9.261

7.  Nonpharmacological Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation: What Is the Role of Device Therapy?

Authors:  Lucie Riedlbauchová; Václav Durdil; Jakub Honěk; Josef Veselka
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2020-04-28

8.  Atrial fibrillation: Long-term follow-up from PROTECT AF trial reported.

Authors:  Megan Cully
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 32.419

9.  Evaluation of anticoagulation use and subsequent stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation after empiric surgical left atrial appendage closure: A retrospective case-control study.

Authors:  Daniel O Johnsrud; Rowlens M Melduni; Brian Lahr; Xiaoxi Yao; Kevin L Greason; Peter A Noseworthy
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 2.882

Review 10.  New approaches to managing nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: what are the thromboembolic implications?

Authors:  Peter J Kudenchuk
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 2.300

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.