Literature DB >> 23324385

Adjusting for perception and unmasking effects in longitudinal clinical trials.

Alan Hubbard1, Farid Jamshidian, Nicholas Jewell.   

Abstract

A blinded clinical trial design requires masking of patients to prevent measurement of their outcome from being influenced by knowledge of treatment assignment. However, during the course of a trial, some patients may be practically unmasked either due to experiencing treatment related side effects in the treatment arm, or lack of efficacy in the placebo arm. In a recent paper, we introduced concepts of perception, unmasking, and placebo effects for point treatment studies. In this paper, we generalize these concepts to longitudinal studies, and use recent advancements in causal inference and semi-parametric efficient estimation to define and estimate perception and unmasking effects. This allows differentiation of the impact on measured outcomes of 'early' versus 'late' unmasking. In particular, two semi-parametric, substitution methods, one based only on the prediction model (G-computation) and an augmented version of that model for targeted bias-reduction (Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation; TMLE), are used for estimation of perception and treatment effects. We motivate our discussion by analyzing data from a recent longitudinal study on the effect of gabapentin on pain among diabetic patients experiencing painful neuropathy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23324385      PMCID: PMC9132571          DOI: 10.2202/1557-4679.1376

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Biostat        ISSN: 1557-4679            Impact factor:   1.829


  16 in total

1.  Assessment of blinding in clinical trials.

Authors:  Heejung Bang; Liyun Ni; Clarence E Davis
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  2004-04

2.  Diagnosing and responding to violations in the positivity assumption.

Authors:  Maya L Petersen; Kristin E Porter; Susan Gruber; Yue Wang; Mark J van der Laan
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 3.021

3.  Identifiability and exchangeability for direct and indirect effects.

Authors:  J M Robins; S Greenland
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 4.822

4.  Estimation of direct causal effects.

Authors:  Maya L Petersen; Sandra E Sinisi; Mark J van der Laan
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.822

5.  An index for assessing blindness in a multi-centre clinical trial: disulfiram for alcohol cessation--a VA cooperative study.

Authors:  K E James; D A Bloch; K K Lee; H C Kraemer; R K Fuller
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1996-07-15       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  A similar DAG could be drawn for adherence-related issues.

Authors:  Ian Shrier
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.021

7.  Identification of natural direct effects when a confounder of the mediator is directly affected by exposure.

Authors:  Eric J Tchetgen Tchetgen; Tyler J Vanderweele
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 4.822

8.  Analyzing Direct Effects in Randomized Trials with Secondary Interventions: An Application to HIV Prevention Trials.

Authors:  Michael Rosenblum; Nicholas P Jewell; Mark van der Laan; Steve Shiboski; Ariane van der Straten; Nancy Padian
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.483

9.  Accounting for perception, placebo and unmasking effects in estimating treatment effects in randomised clinical trials.

Authors:  Farid Jamshidian; Alan E Hubbard; Nicholas P Jewell
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2011-09-08       Impact factor: 2.494

10.  Double blind: double talk or are there ways to do better research.

Authors:  P G Ney; C Collins; C Spensor
Journal:  Med Hypotheses       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 1.538

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  [Systematic errors in clinical studies : A comprehensive survey].

Authors:  W A Golder
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 2.  [Systematic errors in clinical studies : A comprehensive survey].

Authors:  W A Golder
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.372

3.  Using longitudinal targeted maximum likelihood estimation in complex settings with dynamic interventions.

Authors:  M Schomaker; M A Luque-Fernandez; V Leroy; M A Davies
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Joint Estimation of Treatment and Placebo Effects in Clinical Trials with Longitudinal Blinding Assessments.

Authors:  Wei Liu; Zhiwei Zhang; R Jason Schroeder; Martin Ho; Bo Zhang; Cynthia Long; Hui Zhang; Telba Z Irony
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 5.033

5.  A review of time scale fundamentals in the g-formula and insidious selection bias.

Authors:  Alexander P Keil; Jessie K Edwards
Journal:  Curr Epidemiol Rep       Date:  2018-06-15

6.  Developing Placebos for Clinical Research in Traditional Chinese Medicine: Assessing Organoleptic Properties of Three Dosage Forms (Oral Liquid, Capsule and Granule).

Authors:  Mengli Xiao; Jiake Ying; Yang Zhao; Qingna Li; Yingpan Zhao; Rui Gao; Fang Lu
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 5.810

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.