Literature DB >> 23322838

US appearance of ductal carcinoma in situ.

Lilian C Wang1, Megan Sullivan, Hongyan Du, Marina I Feldman, Ellen B Mendelson.   

Abstract

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a noninvasive cancer that accounts for 25% of all breast cancers diagnosed in the United States. DCIS is a heterogeneous disease process with varied clinical manifestations and a broad spectrum of imaging findings. With advances in technology, the ability to detect early-stage cancers has improved, and understanding the role of ultrasonography (US) in the multimodality era of detection and diagnosis is paramount. When calcifications are identified at mammography, US can be performed to evaluate for an invasive component and to allow possible US-guided biopsy. Use of high-frequency transducers, spectral compounding, and speckle reduction algorithms can aid in the detection of calcifications. Calcified DCIS most commonly manifests as echogenic foci located within a mass or duct, associated with internal microlobulations, or distributed in a branch pattern. Noncalcified DCIS, which is more often identified in symptomatic patients, may manifest as a hypoechoic mass with microlobulated margins and no posterior acoustic features, or it may have a "pseudomicrocystic" appearance. Harmonic imaging and coronal reconstruction may improve detection of noncalcified DCIS. The appearance of DCIS at "second-look" US can be subtle and may warrant a lower threshold for detection, given a higher pretest probability of malignancy. US features are nonspecific, and careful correlation with respect to lesion location, size, shape, and depth is needed. The presence of internal vascularity can help increase the positive predictive value of US in this setting. US is a useful adjunct to mammography and magnetic resonance imaging, and recognizing the US appearance of DCIS will aid in the detection and diagnosis of this disease entity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23322838     DOI: 10.1148/rg.331125092

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiographics        ISSN: 0271-5333            Impact factor:   5.333


  18 in total

1.  3-T breast magnetic resonance imaging in patients with suspicious microcalcifications on mammography.

Authors:  B L Stehouwer; L G Merckel; H M Verkooijen; N H G M Peters; R M Mann; K M Duvivier; W P Th M Mali; P H M Peeters; W B Veldhuis; M A A J van den Bosch
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Potential role of shear-wave ultrasound elastography for the differential diagnosis of breast non-mass lesions: preliminary report.

Authors:  Kyung Hee Ko; Hae Kyoung Jung; So Joong Kim; Hyerin Kim; Jung Hyun Yoon
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Twinkling artifact on color Doppler ultrasound: an advantage or a pitfall?

Authors:  Ebru Ozan; Gokce Kaan Atac; Sadi Gundogdu
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 1.314

Review 4.  Advances in Breast MRI in the Setting of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.

Authors:  Nita Amornsiripanitch; Diana L Lam; Habib Rahbar
Journal:  Semin Roentgenol       Date:  2018-08-30       Impact factor: 0.800

5.  Clinics in diagnostic imaging (180). Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).

Authors:  Eu Jin Tan; Tammy Hui Lin Moey; Preetha Madhukumar; Lester Chee Hao Leong
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 1.858

6.  Complex Solid and Cystic Breast Cancer: A Series of Six Case Reports.

Authors:  Nishi Mehta; Lee Rousslang; Mohammad Shokouh-Amiri; Elizabeth L Wiley; Lauren Green
Journal:  J Radiol Case Rep       Date:  2020-02-29

7.  Ultrasound evaluation of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.

Authors:  Marco Moschetta; Angela Sardaro; Adriana Nitti; Michele Telegrafo; Nicola Maggialetti; Arnaldo Scardapane; Maria Chiara Brunese; Valentina Lavelli; Cristina Ferrari
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2021-01-06

8.  Differentiation between Clinically Noninflammatory Granulomatous Lobular Mastitis and Noncalcified Ductal Carcinoma in situ Using Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Ning Qu; Yahong Luo; Tao Yu
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 2.860

9.  Imaging and pathologic features of non-calcified ductal carcinoma in situ: can sonography predict upgrade?

Authors:  Rohini Komarla; Lawrence Gilliland; Maria Piraner; Rebecca Seidel; Kelly Clifford; Jean Kunjummen
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  The role of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the diagnosis of malignant non-mass breast lesions and exploration of diagnostic criteria.

Authors:  Fan Zhang; Lifang Jin; Gang Li; Chao Jia; Qiusheng Shi; Lianfang Du; Rong Wu
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 3.039

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.