Literature DB >> 23321961

Mobile tablet use among academic physicians and trainees.

Joseph Sclafani1, Timothy F Tirrell, Orrin I Franko.   

Abstract

The rapid adoption rate and integration of mobile technology (tablet computing devices and smartphones) by physicians is reshaping the current clinical landscape. These devices have sparked an evolution in a variety of arenas, including educational media dissemination, remote patient data access and point of care applications. Quantifying usage patterns of clinical applications of mobile technology is of interest to understand how these technologies are shaping current clinical care. A digital survey examining mobile tablet and associated application usage was administered via email to all ACGME training programs. Data regarding respondent specialty, level of training, and habits of tablet usage were collected and analyzed. 40% of respondents used a tablet, of which the iPad was the most popular. Nearly half of the tablet owners reported using the tablet in clinical settings; the most commonly used application types were point of care and electronic medical record access. Increased level of training was associated with decreased support for mobile computing improving physician capabilities and patient interactions. There was strong and consistent desire for institutional support of mobile computing and integration of mobile computing technology into medical education. While many physicians are currently purchasing mobile devices, often without institutional support, successful integration of these devices into the clinical setting is still developing. Potential reasons behind the low adoption rate may include interference of technology in doctor-patient interactions or the lack of appropriate applications available for download. However, the results convincingly demonstrate that physicians recognize a potential utility in mobile computing, indicated by their desire for institutional support and integration of mobile technology into medical education. It is likely that the use of tablet computers in clinical practice will expand in the future. Thus, we believe medical institutions, providers, educators, and developers should collaborate in ways that enhance the efficacy, reliability, and safety of integrating these devices into daily medical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23321961      PMCID: PMC4057035          DOI: 10.1007/s10916-012-9903-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Syst        ISSN: 0148-5598            Impact factor:   4.460


  17 in total

1.  MD's computer, PDA use on the upswing.

Authors:  Shelley Martin
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-10-01       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Patient attitudes toward physician use of tablet computers in the exam room.

Authors:  Scott M Strayer; Matthew W Semler; Marit L Kington; Kawai O Tanabe
Journal:  Fam Med       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.756

3.  Impact of mobile tablet computers on internal medicine resident efficiency.

Authors:  Bhakti K Patel; Christopher G Chapman; Nancy Luo; James N Woodruff; Vineet M Arora
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2012-03-12

4.  Technology. Will iPads lead to a technology arms race?

Authors:  Lola Butcher
Journal:  Hosp Health Netw       Date:  2010-03

5.  Which physicians and practices are using electronic medical records?

Authors:  Catharine W Burt; Jane E Sisk
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.301

Review 6.  Use of handheld computers in medical education. A systematic review.

Authors:  Anna Kho; Laura E Henderson; Daniel D Dressler; Sunil Kripalani
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Electronic health records in ambulatory care--a national survey of physicians.

Authors:  Catherine M DesRoches; Eric G Campbell; Sowmya R Rao; Karen Donelan; Timothy G Ferris; Ashish Jha; Rainu Kaushal; Douglas E Levy; Sara Rosenbaum; Alexandra E Shields; David Blumenthal
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  A tablet computer application for patients to participate in their hospital care.

Authors:  David K Vawdrey; Lauren G Wilcox; Sarah A Collins; Suzanne Bakken; Steve Feiner; Aurelia Boyer; Susan W Restaino
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2011-10-22

9.  Computer use among community-based primary care physician preceptors.

Authors:  Patricia A Carney; Daniel A Poor; Karen E Schifferdecker; Dale S Gephart; W Blair Brooks; David W Nierenberg
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 6.893

Review 10.  Who's using PDAs? Estimates of PDA use by health care providers: a systematic review of surveys.

Authors:  Chantelle Garritty; Khaled El Emam
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2006-05-12       Impact factor: 5.428

View more
  35 in total

1.  iPad use in Iowa Research Network family physician offices.

Authors:  Jeanette M Daly; Yinghui Xu; Barcey T Levy
Journal:  J Prim Care Community Health       Date:  2014-11-14

2.  Handheld Electronic Device Use by Pediatric Hospitalists on Family Centered Rounds.

Authors:  Jeremy Kern; Priti Bhansali
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 4.460

3.  Tablet computer use by medical students in the United States.

Authors:  Robert L Robinson; Martha S Burk
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2013-07-07       Impact factor: 4.460

4.  Characteristics of successful technological interventions in mental resilience training.

Authors:  V Vakili; W-P Brinkman; N Morina; M A Neerincx
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2014-07-26       Impact factor: 4.460

Review 5.  m-Health adoption by healthcare professionals: a systematic review.

Authors:  Marie-Pierre Gagnon; Patrice Ngangue; Julie Payne-Gagnon; Marie Desmartis
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2015-06-15       Impact factor: 4.497

6.  The Med AppJam: a model for an interprofessional student-centered mHealth app competition.

Authors:  Julie Youm; Warren Wiechmann
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2015-02-15       Impact factor: 4.460

7.  Smartphone use and acceptability among clinical medical students: a questionnaire-based study.

Authors:  Tim Robinson; Thomas Cronin; Haider Ibrahim; Mark Jinks; Timothy Molitor; Joshua Newman; Jonathan Shapiro
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 4.460

8.  Variation in information needs and quality: implications for public health surveillance and biomedical informatics.

Authors:  Brian E Dixon; Patrick T S Lai; Shaun J Grannis
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2013-11-16

9.  HIPAA Compliance with Mobile Devices Among ACGME Programs.

Authors:  Randall McKnight; Orrin Franko
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 4.460

10.  Information and Communication Technology, Mobile Devices, and Medical Education.

Authors:  Andrea Rodríguez-Ríos; Gerardo Espinoza-Téllez; José Darío Martínez-Ezquerro; Mario Enrique Rendón-Macías
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 4.460

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.