Literature DB >> 24551368

Variation in information needs and quality: implications for public health surveillance and biomedical informatics.

Brian E Dixon1, Patrick T S Lai2, Shaun J Grannis3.   

Abstract

Understanding variation among users' information needs and the quality of information in an electronic system is important for informaticians to ensure data are fit-for-use in answering important questions in clinical and public health. To measure variation in satisfaction with currently reported data, as well as perceived importance and need with respect to completeness and timeliness, we surveyed epidemiologists and other public health professionals across multiple jurisdictions. We observed consensus for some data elements, such as county of residence, which respondents perceived as important and felt should always be reported. However information needs differed for many data elements, especially when comparing notifiable diseases such as chlamydia to seasonal (influenza) and chronic (diabetes) diseases. Given the trend towards greater volume and variety of data as inputs to surveillance systems, variation of information needs impacts system design and practice. Systems must be flexible and highly configurable to accommodate variation, and informaticians must measure and improve systems and business processes to accommodate for variation of both users and information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24551368      PMCID: PMC3900209     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc        ISSN: 1559-4076


  21 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review: surveillance systems for early detection of bioterrorism-related diseases.

Authors:  Dena M Bravata; Kathryn M McDonald; Wendy M Smith; Chara Rydzak; Herbert Szeto; David L Buckeridge; Corinna Haberland; Douglas K Owens
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2004-06-01       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Electronic laboratory data quality and the value of a health information exchange to support public health reporting processes.

Authors:  Brian E Dixon; Julie J McGowan; Shaun J Grannis
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2011-10-22

3.  Progress toward meaningful use: hospitals' adoption of electronic health records.

Authors:  Ashish K Jha; Matthew F Burke; Catherine DesRoches; Maulik S Joshi; Peter D Kralovec; Eric G Campbell; Melinda B Buntin
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.229

4.  Lessons learned from building a culture and infrastructure for continuous quality improvement at Cabarrus Health Alliance.

Authors:  Greg D Randolph; Cappie Stanley; Bobbie Rowe; Sara E Massie; Amanda Cornett; Lisa Macon Harrison; C Suzanne Lea
Journal:  J Public Health Manag Pract       Date:  2012 Jan-Feb

5.  Health reform: is routinely collected electronic information fit for purpose?

Authors:  Siaw-Teng Liaw; Huei-Yang Chen; Della Maneze; Jane Taggart; Sarah Dennis; Sanjyot Vagholkar; Jeremy Bunker
Journal:  Emerg Med Australas       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 2.151

6.  From the ground up: information needs of nurses in a rural public health department in Oregon.

Authors:  Anne M Turner; Zoe Stavri; Debra Revere; Rita Altamore
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2008-10

7.  Medicare and Medicaid programs; electronic health record incentive program--stage 2. Final rule.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fed Regist       Date:  2012-09-04

8.  Public health surveillance in the United States: evolution and challenges.

Authors:  Stephen B Thacker; Judith R Qualters; Lisa M Lee
Journal:  MMWR Suppl       Date:  2012-07-27

9.  MHealth: promise and pitfalls.

Authors:  David Levin
Journal:  Front Health Serv Manage       Date:  2012

10.  Why "What Data Are Necessary for This Project?" and Other Basic Questions are Important to Address in Public Health Informatics Practice and Research.

Authors:  Brian E Dixon; Shaun J Grannis
Journal:  Online J Public Health Inform       Date:  2011-12-22
View more
  6 in total

1.  Associations Between Local Health Department Expenditures on Foundational Capabilities and PHAB Accreditation Standards Scores.

Authors:  Oluwatosin O Dada; Betty Bekemeier; Abraham Flaxman; A B de Castro
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-05-25

2.  Leveraging health information exchange to improve population health reporting processes: lessons in using a collaborative-participatory design process.

Authors:  Debra Revere; Brian E Dixon; Rebecca Hills; Jennifer L Williams; Shaun J Grannis
Journal:  EGEMS (Wash DC)       Date:  2014-10-22

3.  Reliability of administrative data to identify sexually transmitted infections for population health: a systematic review.

Authors:  Brian E Dixon; Saurabh Rahurkar; Yenling Ho; Janet N Arno
Journal:  BMJ Health Care Inform       Date:  2019-08

4.  The Use of an Adapted Health IT Usability Evaluation Model (Health-ITUEM) for Evaluating Consumer Reported Ratings of Diabetes mHealth Applications: Implications for Diabetes Care and Management.

Authors:  Mowafa S Househ; Mamdouh M Shubair; Faisel Yunus; Amr Jamal; Bakheet Aldossari
Journal:  Acta Inform Med       Date:  2015-10-05

5.  Extending an open-source tool to measure data quality: case report on Observational Health Data Science and Informatics (OHDSI).

Authors:  Brian E Dixon; Chen Wen; Tony French; Jennifer L Williams; Jon D Duke; Shaun J Grannis
Journal:  BMJ Health Care Inform       Date:  2020-03

6.  Evaluation of Data Exchange Process for Interoperability and Impact on Electronic Laboratory Reporting Quality to a State Public Health Agency.

Authors:  Sripriya Rajamani; Ann Kayser; Emily Emerson; Sarah Solarz
Journal:  Online J Public Health Inform       Date:  2018-09-21
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.